Manning Knew 'Enemies' Use the Internet, Prosecution Insists
Seven days in, the preliminary hearing for Pfc. Bradley Manning came to an end, with the defense accusing the prosecution of dramatically overcharging Manning and reiterating that there is no evidence the leaks he is accused of ever harmed anybody.
Prosecution members defended the broad charges, which could net Manning life in prison, arguing that he leaked the information “knowing that enemies of the United States use the Internet.”
The “Article 32” hearing will end with Lt. Col. Paul Almanza issuing a recommendation on whether or not Manning should face a court martial over the allegations. The defense had sought Almanza to recuse himself over a conflict of interest, since he works at the Justice Department, which is also working on a separate WikiLeaks case.
The Article 32 hearing has a much lower standard than conviction in an actual trial, and given Almanza’s seemingly sympathetic view toward the prosecution it is virtually a foregone conclusion that he will move the trial on.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Netherlands to Probe Civilian Deaths in Iraq Airstrikes - February 7th, 2016
- State Dept: US Not Planning on New Israel Peace Process - February 7th, 2016
- US Warns Netanyahu Against Spurning Aid Package in Hopes of Better Deal - February 7th, 2016
- Erdogan: US Must Choose Between Turkey and Syrian Kurds - February 7th, 2016
- ISIS Bombers Target Iraqi Troops, Killing 15 in Anbar Attacks - February 7th, 2016