US Forces That Stay Beyond Deadline to Be Treated as 'Invaders'
Though the Iraqi government looks to be slowly but surely backing off on the December deadline for the US troops to leave Iraq, top cleric and key political leader Moqtada al-Sadr has not, and is ratcheting up threats about the possible remnant forces.
Sadr is now saying that any US troops remaining in the country after December, including “trainers” will be treated as “invaders” and will be considered fair targets for attack. Sadr added that the Iraqi government that would allow them to stay “even for training is a weak government.”
Though the comments are likely to fuel more US condemnation of the Sadrist Trend, they are likely more aimed at Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who has recently been seen trying to spin US military trainers as something short of “troops” and insisting he doresn’t need parliament’s approval for trainers.
There seems to be precedent for the US using this sort of semantics to get around the letter and spirit of the law, particularly in Iraq. Last year the US announced all “combat troops” had left Iraq, even though the troops still there continue to this day to engage in combat operations, simply by officially renaming them “non-combat troops.” Doing so may work for press releases, but doesn’t appear likely to convince the Iraqis opposed to a continued US presence, particularly when US forces are launching unilateral attacks in recent days.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Worldwide Shock at British Decision to Leave EU - June 24th, 2016
- Poland: EU Needs a New Treaty to Prevent More Brexits - June 24th, 2016
- Obama Assures Britain 'Special Relationship' Is Safe Despite Brexit - June 24th, 2016
- Pentagon Confirms New Afghan Strikes Since Obama's Recent Escalation - June 24th, 2016
- France Fears Brexit Will Harm Regional Military Power - June 24th, 2016