British officials familiar with the situation said that NATO was prepared to start attacking the rebels in East Libya if reports of growing attacks against civilians did not cease. They insisted that the UN resolution used as a pretext for war authorized such strikes on anyone threating civilians.
A report earlier this week by Human Rights Watch detailed that forces loyal to the East Libyan rebel faction were summarily detaining civilians they suspect of disloyalty and that at least one had died of torture.
The UN panel charged with investigating the civil war agreed as well, with a report early last week saying that both sides had committed war crimes during the conflict. Though operating in the name of pro-democracy protesters, the rebel leadership is largely made up of defectors from the Gadhafi regime.
The rebel council slammed the comments, saying “we object to being threatened by our allies. They are taking part in military action only at our invitation.” Though NATO has been claiming rebel support a number of protesters objected to their involvement, fearing it would devolve into an unending war. With NATO already at war with half the country and threatening the other half, this fear seems hard to dispute.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Despite Assurances, Legality of Trump Nuclear Strike May Not Matter - November 22nd, 2017
- Israeli Forces Demolish Brand New Family Home in East Jerusalem - November 22nd, 2017
- East Ukraine in Turmoil Amid Claimed 'Coup' in Luhansk - November 22nd, 2017
- US Asked for Saudis to Ease Yemen Blockade - November 22nd, 2017
- Local Afghan Leaders Protest Deadly US Strikes on 'Heroin Labs' - November 22nd, 2017