NATO Strike Killed Gadhafi’s Son, Three Grandkids
Officials Say Gadhafi Was Present During Strike But Uninjured
According to Libyan government officials, a NATO air strike which destroyed a home in Tripoli killed Moammar Gadhafi’s youngest son, Saif al-Arab al-Gadhafi, as well as three of his grandchildren. Officials also claimed Gadhafi himself was present during the strike, but escaped unharmed.
NATO denied targeting either of them, saying what they blew up was a “command centre” and not a residence. Libyan rebels celebrated in Benghazi. Officials for the rebel faction claimed the story was probably a trick to try to garner sympathy. The White House claimed to be aware of the reports but to have no information beyond this.
Saif al-Arab (not to be confused with Saif al-Islam al-Gadhafi, Moammar’s second son) was the least public of the long-time dictator’s children, and spent much of the past several years as a student in Germany. There have been no reports of him attending pro-regime rallies or making public statements in favor of his father’s rule.
Indeed, the most high profile incident the slain Gadhafi was ever involved in came in 2008, when his Ferrari was impounded by German police because of a noisy exhaust. The strike, along with the bombing of a school for disabled children, suggest NATO’s escalation of the war is leading to more questionable targets being chosen.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- UN Mediator: Syrian Govt, Rebels Preparing for Peace Talks - May 21st, 2013
- Over 400 Killed in a Week of Iraqi Violence - May 21st, 2013
- Israel's Coalition Deeply Divided on Questions of Peace - May 21st, 2013
- Syria, Israel Trade Fire, Warnings Across Golan Frontier - May 21st, 2013
- Reports: Iran Council to Bar Rafsanjani, Mashaei From Election - May 21st, 2013





Klyde
April 30th, 2011 at 7:36 pm
Meanwhile in the imperial city the man who ordered the killings yucks it up with the fawning sychophants of our socalled free press. DC is truly a magical place.
arnoldo Santacruz
April 30th, 2011 at 7:38 pm
It is unfortunate that Muhammar Gadaffi was not killed. I welcome any atempt to kill this bloody dictator ensalving his people for 40 years. Only the loonies in asylums are supporting the Libyan monster.
MoT
April 30th, 2011 at 8:20 pm
Where is the surprise? Either they're busy killing makeup artists at a TV station in Belgrade, "accidentally" blowing up Chinese embassies, or sending sleeping kids off to their eternal reward but one thing is certainly clear…they sure as hell are being "humanitarian" about it. You hear that Obama and the rest of you, the dear leaders, sycophantic swine?!!
emsnews
April 30th, 2011 at 8:51 pm
Obama might just beat out Bush Jr for war criminal awards being handed out by the Nobel committee.
augustus818
April 30th, 2011 at 11:19 pm
How "humanitarian" of NATO. On top of this, they just got done bombing a school for disabled children. NATO's literally targeting retards for decimation …. Jesus fucking Christ … All I have to say is FUCK NATO. FUCK OBAMA.
curmudgeonvt
May 1st, 2011 at 5:08 am
Close, but…let's remember that The Shrub started this madness of invading sovereign arab nations. For that he garners the supreme War Crimes award. Too bad they'll never get the chance to present him (and his cohorts) with the hemp necklace they so heartily deserve.
Chris Mallory
May 1st, 2011 at 5:16 am
So, if the Libyans blow up the White House, a command center, and the Obama spawn are killed………that is ok now? Just collateral damage, fog of war, etc. etc………….
curmudgeonvt
May 1st, 2011 at 5:16 am
Regarding Gadhafi, if "NATO" hadn't pissed him off before, I imagine that this just might do it. If he's as certifiable as surmised, and with the resources you just know he's squirreled away that he might just decide that it's time to make something bad happen somewhere. Nothing as mean vicious as a wounded dog that's cornered. "NATO" should have snipped all the "problem areas" when they started this fiasco. I suspect that the USG might want to use their new "terrorist warning" scale…
Terrance&Philip
May 1st, 2011 at 8:34 am
'Too bad they'll never get the chance to present him[Bush] (and his cohorts) with the hemp necklace they so heartily deserve.'
Tens of millions of Americans agree with your sentiment.
Valerianus
May 1st, 2011 at 11:25 am
Why don't you just head on out and try killing him yourself, you craven coward, instead of sitting there and whining for someone else to do it.
Bianca
May 1st, 2011 at 11:37 am
Please go yourself. And better yet, let us have a way to vote for funds designated for foreign misadventures. I suggest you, and people like you, should be men, and pay up the assessed cost of such programs. These kinds of programs must benefit someone — and those who enjoy it — so why should we pay for it. Only yesterday a gereral avered that Washington should be prepared for the EXPENSIVE and LONG TERM process of reconstructing Libya. Are we mad or what? And please enough of AQ in Magreb, Arabian Penninsula, Mezopotamia… I cannot imagine AQ having a naming converntions deparment. These are the products of creative bureaucratic minds to make up something that does not exist. There are plenty of tribes in Sahel, and you can either control them to have a state, or let them control their own territory, and become states. But you cannot come up with naming conventions, and use tribes for whatever is convenient. At times as rebels, at other as villians of AQ. Enough Already.
DonT
May 1st, 2011 at 11:51 am
Who ordered the omelette?
JDonald
May 1st, 2011 at 12:17 pm
Why have the leaders of the Western Christian world reverted to such egregious terror tactics to make their point to the Libyans and the whole world? Prime Minister Cameron and French President Sarkozy should be brought before the Internationl courts for crimes against humanity. We have already seen the complete disregard for human life that came alon with the imprisionment of the Palestinians by the Israelis and the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan by the USA. If the rest of the world reverted to the same tactics of these "civilized" countries, there wouldn't be a safe place on the face of the earth. When will we recover our repect for HUMAN LIFE?
Al_Dove
May 1st, 2011 at 1:31 pm
But they died "humanely" in a "humanitarian" action.
Blessed be the war-mongers, for they shall sit at the right hand of power.
Blessed be the bloody hand, for it shall stroke the organ of power.