NATO officials again claimed that forces loyal to Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi were using “human shields” by being in places near civilians when NATO warplanes were hoping to bomb them.
Previous claims were meant to explain away the lack of attacks in certain cities. Sunday, however, the allegation was different, as NATO insisted it ignored the dangers to civilians and attacked the Libyan military assets anyway.
“We will not always be able to limit loss of life,” insisted NATO Gen. Charles Bouchard, adding that “regime forces should understand that if they continue to follow orders to attack their own people they will be targeted.”
So far there is no indication of how many civilian casualties were caused in Sunday’s bombings. The bombing, however, seems to be largely in the West of the nation, in Tripoli and Misrata. The fighting, meanwhile, seems to be centered mostly around the eastern city of Ajdabiyah.
Canadian General is in charge of Destroy Libya mission, reality of new bellicose and militaristic regime of Steven Harper.
The fraud from Nato is obviously: First sending their rebells and news fakers, then claiming to protect them and finally bombing civilians and the army of the attacked country. .
Gaddafi is a dictator and he admits to its regime.., yet his regime works for his people with free healthcare and education for everyone.., there are no homeless people living in that country and he is more Muslim then Muslims brotherhood and the those whom are supported by CIA are combine.., to the Libyan standard he is a progressive figure and been doing so for his people.., hence.., what about Hillary Clinton or her husband, what about US history in conducting wars for last 60 years with almost every nations in this world, what about a universal healthcare for american people, what about a free education for american people, what about taking care of increasing numbers of homeless people in america.., what about being able to take care of elderly and sick people in america.., is she or Obama thinking about these social issues or in theoretical terms they will do something about it when they have time.., question is.., with all these wars..,, when would they find time to look into the real problems.., respecting the principals in democracy.., and make democracy a functioning system for people.., that is to say if such thing as democracy exist in ways that federal government is operating.
Jamal: I don't think the Libyan people love Qaddafi. But otherwise, you're on the money.
Heeeeeeeey, wait a minute! Didn't NATO go in to begin with because Qaddafi was using human shields? What up with that NATO? Is it possible that y'all don't care and are just there for the oil and not for humanitarian reasons?
NWO=OWO. Expect inbred NATO bigotry to rule today. They have to go. All they do is murder and plot and play lawngames. Pres. B.O. just MAYBE has electrode implants. He sure acts like it. The U.S. is going to get the bills for this, but not much else.
Ho hum, the old 'human shield' propaganda cliche, rather like the 'babies on bayonets' fantasy or maybe the 'babies thrown out of incubators' tale.
There really is a creative vacuum when it comes to propaganda; like Hollywood all they can do is recyle successes of the past, with predictable results and skepticism.
However for sheer outrageous desperate imaginative daring the one about Gaddafi's forces mingling with the rebels, shooting at Allied planes while surrounded by rebels, and then running back to their own side whereupon Allied planes bombed the rebels by mistake. Sadly, that one was blown when one of the rebels admitted it was they who shot at the Allied planes.
Anyway it looks like the rebels won't have to paint the roofs of their vehicles pink after all, because collateral damage is the order of the day no matter whose side you're on, and anyway Gaddafi could easily have all his roofs painted pink, too. So, fire away NATO, and don't apologize.