The Obama Administration is continuing to threaten military intervention in Libya, but as ever continues to say that they have yet to decide on if or how to do so. The administration, however, is facing growing calls to launch such an attack.
Not from inside Libya, of course, as the top factions in the rebel group have repeatedly and loudly spurned US offers of assistance, and the concern that US intervention would do far more damage to the rebels’ popular support than anything else remains a strong reason to oppose it.
But Sens. John Kerry (D – MA) and John McCain (R – AZ), both forever enthusiastic about starting new US wars, are leading the charge for attacking Libya, no matter how unwise, and President Obama, seemingly ambivalent on the matter, seems to be at serious risk of taking these calls as an excuse to pick a side.
At the same time, the big sticking point for the US occupation, beyond of course the two struggling occupations already ongoing, is NATO reluctance to go along with such a plan. Italy and Germany have both ruled out meddling in Libya, and Britain is still reeling from its humiliating weekend action. Can the administration really sell the public on a unilateral invasion, particularly with both sides of the fledgling civil war opposing that invasion? Only time will tell.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Saudis Demolish Historic Shi'ite Neighborhood, Sparking Unrest - June 27th, 2017
- Turkey, Kurdish Forces Trade Fire in North Syria's Afrin District - June 27th, 2017
- Mattis: US Will Keep Arming Syrian Kurds After Raqqa Falls - June 27th, 2017
- Russia: US Warning to Syria Is Unacceptable - June 27th, 2017
- Saudi Arabia Insists Qatar Demands Are 'Non-Negotiable' - June 27th, 2017