Proclaiming Victory, Predicting Failure: The Obama Administration’s Bizarre Afghanistan ‘Promise’
Biden Claims War Will End 'by 2014' Despite Massive Evidence to Contrary
In high profile comments made only yesterday, Vice President Joe Biden declared that the United States was on the verge of victory in Afghanistan, and that the United States and its 100,000 occupation troops would be “totally out of there, come hell or high water, by 2014.”
Its a promise, at least as close as the Vice President could come without using the actual word “promise,” but it is one which every single report and every single official statement, beyond a couple days of trying to spin the war as showing “progress,” totally contradicts.
The Obama Administration just got done with the NATO summit in Lisbon,which eyed the beginning of a serious transfer to Afghan security forces started in 2015. Even that was dismissed by the Pentagon as overly optimistic, and a number of officials have insisted that even after the “transition” troops will be fighting in Afghanistan for decades, open-endedly.
The “promise,” such as it is, seems to be a function of President Obama’s Thursday speech, claiming massive progress in the war, convincing virtually no one. At the same time it is a promise that no one seriously expects will be kept, leaving many grasping for a word that means the same thing as “overt liar” but isn’t as likely to hurt the Vice President’s feelings.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- No Deal: US Restarted Pakistan Drone Strikes Despite Objections - February 22nd, 2012
- Syrian National Council Demands Foreign Invasion - February 22nd, 2012
- State Dept.: Pakistani Taliban 'Not Welcome' at Truce Talks - February 22nd, 2012
- Israeli FM: Our Decision to Attack Iran None of US, Russia's Business - February 22nd, 2012
- Hunger Strike Ends, but Adnan's Detention Without Charges Doesn't - February 22nd, 2012





skulz fontaine
December 20th, 2010 at 9:11 pm
Seems to recall a similiar blah blah blah just before the cut bait and gits the hell out of Saigon. Eerily reminiscent in the very least.
Alex Bell
December 20th, 2010 at 10:17 pm
I don't like 'overt liar' either. I'd prefer 'blatant liar' or, better still, 'shameless liar'.
Regards, Alex
Johnny_Warbucks
December 21st, 2010 at 5:51 am
Bizarre is an appropriate word to describe this administration.
John_Mohammad
December 21st, 2010 at 6:37 am
I think 'overt liar' is pretty much on the mark. Same story, different politician.
Obama and Co., please sign here for your shipment of FAIL.
jeff_davis
December 21st, 2010 at 8:40 am
I personally prefer "indicted liar", "soon to be indicted liar", or my personal favorite: "convicted liar now serving time".
Bill
December 21st, 2010 at 9:16 am
It appears neither Biden nor Obama got permission from Gen. Petraeus about being out by the 2014 date.
Albert Bakker
December 21st, 2010 at 9:25 am
To large audiences especially, always lie big. Big lies deepen convictions. Doubt makes people less certain and is almost universally abhorred. (This is exactly why the scientific method comes unnatural to people.) Contradiction with realities demand reinterpretation of reality, not re-evaluation of the contradictory statement. While inconvenient, this creates the empowering illusion of taking matter in your hands, however misguided and counter-productive, while the alternative: dealing with the truth of the matter, generally feels like an acknowledgement of defeat, disorientation and disillusionment. Now that you must go against the majority, who overcoming the truth with deepened convictions lessened their patience with obstinate dissent, the burden of proof lies on your shoulders. This I think is why big lies work so well.
guests
December 21st, 2010 at 10:00 am
Obama – Biden and their democratic government.., as many time before.., has promised prospers life for millions upon millions of American people.., yet any promised matter to be materialized.., in the other hand.., the timing is what should be the question: the presidential election is on or about 2014 which Biden is referring to.., if democrats winning the presidential election.., then under their term and conditions they will stop the war.., yet I wouldn’t buy Joe Biden, Bill Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, Donald Rumsfeled, Paul Wolfowitz, or this boy from Heinz ketchup.., Kerry.., used car even if they were selling it from their home with a guarantee.., simply they wont tell you what is hiding beneath the car.
andy
December 21st, 2010 at 1:50 pm
Reminds me of the 'light at the end of the tunnel' nonsense just before Tet.