Obama Policy Retains Right to Nuke Iran
Obama's 'New' Policy Leaves Hydrogen Bomb-Sized Loophole
Much has been made in the past few weeks of the Obama Administration’s plan to issue a new nuclear weapons doctrine, replacing the Bush Doctrine that included the possibility of using nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states.
But while the Obama Administration is formally renouncing that option on the surface and claiming its arsenal is for “deterrence” only, it appears that the doctrine will include an enormous loophole that will mean the nominal policy shift will ultimately mean very little.
The loophole will insist that the only non-nuclear states free of preemptive nuking are those which are “in compliance with their nonproliferation obligations.” This would, at least from the administration’s perspective, leave open the possibility of attacking Iran with nuclear weapons.
Iran would certainly argue that they are in compliance, of course, but exactly what these obligations are is never altogether clear to the public (the IAEA safeguards agreements are not made public) and President Obama has made clear that he believes Iran is not.
At the end of the day this policy is only a guideline anyhow, and if the president decided to nuke Iran the after the fact argument of if they were really non-compliant will likely be very much beside the point. But while the president still claims to have a goal of a nuclear-free world, the manufacture of such a deliberate loophole for a nuclear first strike is beyond troubling.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Centrifuge Glitch Fuels Latest Iran Scare Stories - May 25th, 2012
- Iraq MPs Push Return to Saddam-Era Conscription Laws - May 25th, 2012
- US Negotiator on Iran to 'Reaffirm Our Unshakeable Commitment to Israel' - May 25th, 2012
- UN: Syria Bombings Likely by 'Established Terrorist Groups' - May 25th, 2012
- Military to Avoid Embarrassing Pictures by Banning Photography - May 25th, 2012





Mad Eddie
April 6th, 2010 at 4:17 am
Which is exactly why Iran needs to get some nukes….. if only to protect itself from the Great Satan
epppie
April 6th, 2010 at 4:29 am
This is NOTHING but more classic Obamian Orwellism. The 'new' strategy is so completely hedged that it's simply the 'old' strategy with glitter sprinkled over it. In fact, it solidifies nuclear impunity by sacralizing nuclear attacks currently under consideration (Iran, North Korea, Syria) as 'exceptions', 'outliers'. Notice how the terminologies of militarized fascism are converging. Extremists at home and outliers abroad need expect no rights, no mercy, no sympathy…
Thomas Ward
April 6th, 2010 at 4:58 am
I'm with you guys, with this sort of sloppy thinking around, everyone needs realistic deterrence to keep the seekers of domination at bay…. Run your country, not OURS..!!!!
Peaceful_Idiot
April 6th, 2010 at 5:14 am
Nice loophole. Wouldn't want the US Federal Government to appear hypocritical.
Druthers
April 6th, 2010 at 7:06 am
More and more it is like being mired in quicksand and as we sink seeing a beautiful blue sky above us and knowing that we will never see it again.
Montaigne
April 6th, 2010 at 8:41 am
It seems a new world order is being made. A spinned one. People are spinned into agreeing with their political and military leaders. So I suggest your American Empire should be depicted not by an eagle, but a gigantic black spider sitting at the top of the globe.
"Changed spin, you can believe in, while continuing to obey your masters."
Historically, what came after the classic Greek democracy, with its sophism (another spin type of regime), was NOT truth and honesty – Aristotle was just a short glimpse before the new times – but instead WITHDRAWAL from, and DISTRUST in, the world. In the form of STOICISM. Because people still needs some truths to hold to, after all, as humans.. And I prophecy our times will be seen eventually as the great age of WASTE. Of work, production, mind.. A LOWER and more MISERABLE form of life than was fitting for humans. No dignity, respect, consistence, meaning. The great, dark Age of Spider Surveillance. Or ASS, as you Americans – with usual love for snappy abbreviations – might label your empire
augustus818
April 6th, 2010 at 9:24 am
Montaigne, Stoicism is about self-control and reason, not withdrawal and distrust. I agree though with your assertion that this age will be seen as a very dark one. Which is why we need self-control and reason all the more to see us through. Eventually the Spider State will be brought into the light and wither away or crushed under it's own weight. Though that leaves open the question of how many get hurt in the meantime. One can only weather the storm and hope for the best.
Obama Policy Retains Right to Nuke Iran | NWOTruth
April 6th, 2010 at 4:44 am
[...] Antiwar | Jason Ditz | Mon, April 5, 2010 Last 5 posts in IranIndia rebuffs US calls to shun Iran gas talks – April 5th, 2010Kristol: ‘Better’ for US to attack Iran than if Israel did – April 5th, 2010"Reporting" on Iran should seem familiar – March 31st, 2010CIA: Iran capable of producing nukes – March 30th, 2010Obama, Sarkozy push for UN sanctions on Iran – March 30th, 2010Last 5 posts in Obama AdministrationObama Expands Military Involvement in Africa – April 4th, 2010Obama to Open Offshore Areas to Oil Drilling for First Time – March 31st, 2010Chomsky: Obama is ‘delivering, but for financial institutions’ – March 29th, 2010CIA paper reveals plans to manipulate European opinion on Afghanistan – March 26th, 2010TARP watchdog slams Obama foreclosure program – March 24th, 2010 [...]
Oldtimer
April 6th, 2010 at 2:54 pm
How about just nuke Israel. That would get rid of the worlds trouble maker and there would be peace for all.
aba
April 6th, 2010 at 4:48 pm
choclate is good for hearts.if you want to loose some kilo,soya is best .if you wants better mental case,stay away of nukes.
JLS
April 6th, 2010 at 5:03 pm
Wait a minute…I thought it McCain who sang "bomb bomb bomb Iran" ? I thought only the republicans were for that sort of thing?
aba
April 6th, 2010 at 5:29 pm
just imagine,this person got a nobel prize.
Gera Rosy
April 6th, 2010 at 5:32 pm
As it should be; thus freeing Planet Earth to cleanse itself of human pestilence.
JLS
April 6th, 2010 at 5:34 pm
He won that prestigious award for the great achievement of not being Bush
Obama ‘Reserves the Right’ To Murder Millions « LewRockwell.com Blog
April 6th, 2010 at 10:04 am
[...] would only nuke Iran if it were necessary, of course, if he thought that country might be able to stand up to US imperialism. He also claims [...]
Big Daddy
April 6th, 2010 at 6:58 pm
What blue sky?
It's usually covered with chemtrails…
tioche
April 6th, 2010 at 7:51 pm
obomber IS the most deadly liar- others lie , but the war criminal in chief is in the power place to be able to nuke anyone in the way of fascist amerikan imperialism !
tioche, Mexico
watashi
April 6th, 2010 at 8:09 pm
I AGREE WITH YOU SIR………….1000% (A VIET NAM ERA VET,AIR FORCE)
André
April 6th, 2010 at 8:51 pm
Sitting in Sweden and have just heard the evening news on so-called public service Program 1. It's more like a cerebral pogrom. We don't have an Amy Goodman ; we have PBS bull shit. They naturally didn't mention the loophole. Well, if Obama wants the option of the ultimate in state terrorism, he's got it. He had better know that any initial successes will soon be overshadowed by the consequences of opening Pandora's box. He needs some good advice from the great Israeli peace activist , Uri Avneri. Someone, please ! Get Avneri's phone number to Obama before it's too late. I'm not kidding.
Druthers
April 6th, 2010 at 9:07 pm
I was using the blue sky figuratively as a representation of all that we have lost and are losing and the horrible impression that what is lost will never come back.
Valerianus
April 6th, 2010 at 9:25 pm
Not only would it solve the problem, it would be fitting payback for the evils Israel has inflicted on its neighbors.
JLS
April 6th, 2010 at 9:39 pm
You're in Sweden? Hey tell them thanks for the peace prize!
Andy
April 6th, 2010 at 9:59 pm
Too bad Serbia didn't have them in 1999.
Andy
April 6th, 2010 at 10:25 pm
What a catastrophic mistake it was in 1948 to let that country be created through the conquest of Palestine. Every year this becomes more and more clear.
MoT
April 7th, 2010 at 12:01 am
Mr. "Nuke 'Em" Nobel Prize winner is clearly a raving lunatic. I wonder when Code Pink will do a "die in" at the Capitol in protest. Nah!…. Their nuclear savior is at the button, why bother!
Nancy cool
April 7th, 2010 at 1:47 am
IS THIS THE EXTENDED HAND THAT OBAMA IS TALKING ABOUT?
Perun
April 6th, 2010 at 6:00 pm
Iran and every freedom and liberty loving Nation needs nuclear weapons as deterrence against Anglo-American Terrorist Organization and coalition of Satraps.
McBell
April 7th, 2010 at 3:30 am
You know what's disgusting? Purportedly antiwar people casually, joyfully even, advocating the nuking of tons of innocent people.
MoT
April 7th, 2010 at 8:41 pm
Extended hand? More like extended middle finger.
Blog » Blog Archive » O-Bombs-Ya: Still Horrible
April 7th, 2010 at 5:18 pm
[...] despite his recent revision to the Bush Doctrine, O-Bombs-Ya is still supporting the use of nuclear weapons if it fits his [...]