Evidence Mounts NATO Report Lied on Afghan Civilian Killings
Rear Admiral Smith Admits No Evidence of Claimed 'Firefight'
The February 12 night raid against a house party in Afghanistan’s Paktia Province remains shrouded in mystery, but NATO’s official story appears to be crumbling as even NATO officials concede that the claims made were not strictly true.
NATO’s official statement claimed at the time that the raid on the home led to a “fire fight” against “several insurgents” who were killed, before NATO made a “gruesome discovery” of bound and gagged bodies in a nearby room.
Witnesses at the site reported that one of the people in the compound, a local policeman, shouted “don’t fire, we work for the government” before being gunned down by the invading forces.
Rear Admiral Smith defended the killing of the policeman, however, saying “if you have got an individual stepping out of a compound, and if your assault force is there, that is often the trigger to neutralise (read: kill) the individual. You don’t have to be fired upon to fire back.
Since the incident, all those detained by NATO have been released without charges. In addition, the US has reportedly paid $2,000 to the family for each of the civilians killed in the attack.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Centrifuge Glitch Fuels Latest Iran Scare Stories - May 25th, 2012
- Iraq MPs Push Return to Saddam-Era Conscription Laws - May 25th, 2012
- US Negotiator on Iran to 'Reaffirm Our Unshakeable Commitment to Israel' - May 25th, 2012
- UN: Syria Bombings Likely by 'Established Terrorist Groups' - May 25th, 2012
- Military to Avoid Embarrassing Pictures by Banning Photography - May 25th, 2012





MvGuy
March 13th, 2010 at 5:41 am
"Why do they hate us??" **"Rear Admiral Smith defended the killing of the policeman, however, saying “if you have got an individual stepping out of a compound, and if your assault force is there, that is often the trigger to neutralize (read: kill) the individual. You don’t have to be fired upon to fire back." This is the precise type of psychopathy and egocentricity people hate.. Case closed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Evidence Mounts NATO Report Lied on Afghan Civilian Killings « Dr Nasir Khan
March 13th, 2010 at 1:00 am
[...] Admiral Smith Admits No Evidence of Claimed ‘Firefight’ by Jason Ditz, Antiwar.com, March 12, [...]
Bruce Richardson
March 13th, 2010 at 2:10 pm
What have we become? When we slaughter innocents we are no better than those we cast as so-called terrorists. A state can also be guilty of terrorism. This war in Afghanistan, like the war in Iraq, is unlawful and constitutes "war of aggression" under the WWII Nuremberg Standard. When bombs fall on and turn to rubble rural mud-walled villages and when a door is kicked in during the wee hours of the morning followed by heavily armed soldiers shooting, shouting in unintelligible languages while displaying the laser designators on the bodies of terrified civilians, is this not terror to those on the receiving end? This is absolute madness.
“Reality TV” meets Real World « LewRockwell.com Blog
March 13th, 2010 at 9:26 am
[...] while the next day’s news was about our government (and NATO – is there a difference?) blatantly lying about a mass murder (apparently routine) that occurred in Afghanistan last month? It is already the mainstream opinion that the US government lied about the rationale for invasion [...]
dahoit
March 13th, 2010 at 5:34 pm
when was the last time that the press has bemoaned the fact that the alleged perpetrator of 9-11 is still at large?in about 8 years?what a scam.
Shrewd Non-Aggressor
March 13th, 2010 at 6:31 pm
I expect a full and comprehensive report on this topic from the Associated Press — NOT!
Henry_Clemens
March 14th, 2010 at 1:43 am
"when a door is kicked in during the wee hours of the morning followed by heavily armed soldiers shooting, shouting in unintelligible languages while displaying the laser designators on the bodies of terrified civilians, is this not terror to those on the receiving end? This is absolute madness. " Just substitute the words "SWAT cops" for "soldiers" in your statement and you have a very accurate description of what American citizens have to endure on a daily basis right here in the good old USA. How is it that otherwise decent men can put on government issued costumes and then assume that they have the right to treat other human beings like they're nothing but vermin to be exterminated? And how is it that "we the people" can tolerate such evil?
matthewgood.org » Archive » Los Angeles Day Day 6, Post 2
March 13th, 2010 at 5:52 pm
[...] to mention of import…hmm. How about this/a>, this, this, this, and [...]
MoT
March 14th, 2010 at 4:35 am
Well, seems our training programs for the cops are right on "target". And we wonder why they randomly shoot our goof ball military goons in the back.
Chad
March 14th, 2010 at 3:53 pm
"You don't have to be fired upon to fire back."
No further commentary is needed, other than to wonder about the complete lack of logic in that statement.
Pseudolus
March 14th, 2010 at 7:28 pm
Don't be too hard on Admiral Smith– he's just trying a little too hard to win the Pentagon's coveted
"Fred C. Dobbs" higher leadership award.
Did NATO Lie about Afghan Civilian Killings? « Civilianism News
March 16th, 2010 at 3:30 pm
[...] From Anti-war Radio [...]
The Gardez Massacre and dollar compensation for war crimes « Craig Considine
March 24th, 2010 at 9:24 am
[...] US and Nato forces perceive innocent civilians in Afghanistan. Nato Rear Admiral Greg Smith said in an interview on the Gardez Massacre that ‘If you have got an individual stepping out of [...]