Price of US Wars: $1 Trillion and Rising
Direct Spending Reaches New Milestone
The Congressional Budget Office’s newly released budget outlook notes that Congress has approved over $1 trillion in direct spending on wars and war-related activities since 2001, and that price tag is only getting higher as the wars drag on.
The spending was divided between $708 billion for the Iraq War, $345 billion for the Afghan War, and $22 billion for assorted other war activities in other countries. The Obama Administration’s repeated projections of a lower budget output for wars in coming years aside, they show no sign of slowing.
The estimated price tag only includes direct costs incurred as a result of the US occupations of those nations, and does not include the trillions of other dollars spent on the military since 2001.
Nor does it include the overall cost of the war to the American economy, a figure economists put at several trillion dollars years ago, and which has only risen as the US presence overseas continues to grow.
The US currently has over 100,000 troops in Iraq, and the escalation in Afghanistan will soon have America’s commitment there near 100,000 as well. The Obama Administration has projected cuts to the Iraq force since taking office, but recent bombings have raised serious doubts about America’s ability to withdraw from the nation, years after both parties agreed that the war was successfully “won.” Troop numbers in Afghanistan will likely continue to rise for the forseeable future.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Judge: Bradley Manning Trial Will Include 'Classified' Portions - May 21st, 2013
- Afghan Officials: Body of US Torture Video Victim Found Near Base - May 21st, 2013
- State Dept Official Says Iranian Troops of Fighting in Syria - May 21st, 2013
- Austria: If EU Arms Syrian Rebels, We'll Withdraw From UN Mission - May 21st, 2013
- UN Mediator: Syrian Govt, Rebels Preparing for Peace Talks - May 21st, 2013





Andy
January 27th, 2010 at 5:28 am
Please type in 'what does one trillion dollars look like' to get some sense of all this madness.
Robert Fisher
January 27th, 2010 at 7:15 am
War escalation were not included in the Freeze. medicare even was cut back to loosen up more funds for the War. when are you People going to pull another Vietnam and tell your Generals : enough is enough ?
Andy
January 27th, 2010 at 8:15 am
When they bring back the draft.
AVietnamWarVet
January 27th, 2010 at 3:07 pm
As Nikita Kruschev observed and said: "We don't have to worry about the United States. They will spend themselves out of existence." WOW – how did he know that way back in the 1950s?
Henry_Clemens
January 27th, 2010 at 3:37 pm
Trillions of dollars for unjust, immoral and aggressive war; hundreds of billions of dollars to fund the military-industrial complex; and hundreds of billions of dollars to bailout the Wall Street banksters, but not one damned penney for millions of poor Americans who can't afford health insurance. Now tell me, is there one damned bit of diffrence between the Demoncrats and the Repugnantcans? No, there is no diffrence. They are both owned lock, stock and barrel by the corporations. The federal government has become a fascist (corporate) enterprise.
River Rat
January 27th, 2010 at 4:11 pm
And another thing, the money made her in the U.S. is lost when you figure what the private contractors have stolen.
Price of US Wars: $1 Trillion and Rising | Republic Broadcasting Network
January 27th, 2010 at 9:16 am
[...] Online Store var addthis_pub="otero1"; Price of US Wars: $1 Trillion and Rising (Anti War) [...]
MJR
January 27th, 2010 at 5:51 pm
Bring home all US military… relocate them… and use the $1,000,000,000,000
H E R E!!!!!!!!!
mrraven
January 27th, 2010 at 6:34 pm
The U.S.S.R. already sent itself out of existence by the late 80s on militarism and we are going down the same path, sad.
bonethug iranian
January 27th, 2010 at 6:50 pm
"$22 billion for assorted other war activities in other countries…" WTF???
Price of US Wars: $1 Trillion and Rising « NWO Observer
January 27th, 2010 at 10:53 am
[...] Read more… [...]
Blog round up « Rosa's Ghost
January 27th, 2010 at 11:48 am
[...] round up Jump to Comments Antiwar.com: Price of US wars is 1 trillion and [...]
Price of US Wars: $1 Trillion and Rising - Political Forum
January 27th, 2010 at 11:49 am
[...] war-related activities since 2001, and that price tag is only getting higher as the wars drag on. for more also Q+A-Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan tops $1 trillion why worry about TARP, bailout of auto makers [...]
Wednesday | Headlines
January 27th, 2010 at 2:06 pm
[...] Price of US Wars: $1 Trillion and Rising [...]
tioche
January 27th, 2010 at 10:15 pm
The stupids in the fascist government DO NOT get it- bazillions spent daily to terrorize, torture and occupy 3 nations ! And they think somehow their country can recover ?!
tioche; Mexico
Michael Shannon
January 27th, 2010 at 10:32 pm
The costs of veterans health care and pensions for the Viet Nam War has not yet peaked. I expect for every dollar of incremental costs there will be another two or three for health care, pensions, GI Bill benefits and equipment replacements. The War on Terror has already put the US on the hook for $ 4 trillion and Afghanistan will add another trillion before it's wound up.
THE PLIGHT OF MODERN DAY PHARAOH « Hiram's 1555 Blog
January 27th, 2010 at 4:12 pm
[...] Anti WarThe Congressional Budget Office’s newly released budget outlook notes that Congress has approved [...]
Alan MacDonald
January 27th, 2010 at 8:08 pm
Luckily, Obama announced in his State of the Union that the ‘freeze’ will not apply to our military Empire’s budget.
Dar
January 28th, 2010 at 5:11 am
Each billion dollars collected in federal taxes results in about 80 deaths over the couple years following collection due to increased risks from the involuntary removal of property. One family might delay getting new brakes. Another might delay throwing out food. It goes on and the risks add up. They add up to 80 deaths per $B. This is in addition to other harm such as bad grades or broken legs.
(Each billion printed or borrowed by the feds will result in more deaths over a longer period, but to keep this simple, we can assume the wars were paid for by taxes.)
That means the wars since 2001 have a funding cost that includes 80,000 deaths of Americans. (The costs to Americans are much higher than that; this is just the funding.)
That is a lot.
Price of US Wars: $1 Trillion and Rising! « Socio-Economics History Blog
January 28th, 2010 at 8:29 pm
[...] reports: The Congressional Budget Office’s newly released budget outlook notes that Congress has [...]
Justin Raimondo: The State of the Empire | War On You: Breaking Alternative News
January 30th, 2010 at 8:00 pm
[...] would exclude military appropriations. Given that our war-spending is now totaling $1 trillion and rising since 2001, this huge exception reduces all talk of a “freeze” to mere rhetorical [...]
Tom Engelhardt: Seven Days in January: How the Pentagon Counts Coups in Washington | Twitmerlin - News, Celebs Gossip, Social Media
January 31st, 2010 at 7:30 pm
[...] Or consider that only days after his plane landed, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released its latest “budget outlook” indicating that the Iraq and Afghan Wars had already cost the American taxpayer more than $1 trillion in Congressionally-approved dollars, with no end in sight. Just as the non-freeze on defense spending in the State of the Union Address caused next to no mainstream comment, so there would be no significant media response to this (and these costs didn’t even include the massive projected societal price of the two wars, including future care for wounded soldiers and the replacement of worn out or destroyed equipment, which will run so much higher). [...]
Tomgram: Engelhardt, Movie Favorites from the Secretary of Defense – Rethink Afghanistan War Blog
February 1st, 2010 at 7:58 am
[...] Or consider that only days after his plane landed, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released its latest “budget outlook” indicating that the Iraq and Afghan Wars had already cost the American taxpayer more than $1 trillion in Congressionally-approved dollars, with no end in sight. Just as the non-freeze on defense spending in the State of the Union Address caused next to no mainstream comment, so there would be no significant media response to this (and these costs didn’t even include the massive projected societal price of the two wars, including future care for wounded soldiers and the replacement of worn out or destroyed equipment, which will run so much higher). [...]
Movie Favorites from the Secretary of Defense — Tom Engelhardt comments on Robert Gates’ taste in cinema. « Chicago Labor & Arts Festival Blog
February 7th, 2010 at 7:31 pm
[...] Or consider that only days after his plane landed, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released its latest “budget outlook” indicating that the Iraq and Afghan Wars had already cost the American taxpayer more than $1 trillion in Congressionally-approved dollars, with no end in sight. Just as the non-freeze on defense spending in the State of the Union Address caused next to no mainstream comment, so there would be no significant media response to this (and these costs didn’t even include the massive projected societal price of the two wars, including future care for wounded soldiers and the replacement of worn out or destroyed equipment, which will run so much higher). [...]