Administration Frustrated by Pentagon’s Struggles in Afghan Escalation
Gen. McChrystal Says Deployment Pace Was Never Realistic
Top members of the Obama Administration are reportedly up in arms over what they say is the failure of the Pentagon to live up to the president’s promise to have 30,000 additional troops deployed as part of the December-announced escalation by the summer.
Several officials, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates, had promised the troops would be in place by summer’s end, and the strategy reportedly hinges on the ability to add a lot of troops to the nation in a short period of time.
It had been speculated since the announcement of the escalation that the Pentagon would struggle to add so many troops to a landlocked nation with virtually no infrastructure and few paved roads. Still, Admiral Michael Mullen insisted the logistics people would figure it out.
But now that General Stanley McChrystal, the commander in Afghanistan and architect of the escalation, is under fire for the delays, he is angrily insisting that the president’s deployment pace was “never realistic.” Though it is unclear how much the delay will set back the escalation’s pace, it seems officials are already looking to shift blame.
But one has to wonder what would have happened if General McChrystal had gotten the 80,000 additional troops he at one point sought. If the Pentagon can’t get 30,000 troops into the combat zone in the next nine months, it seems as if that plan would’ve taken several years to implement.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Four Killed as Another US Drone Strike Hits Pakistan - February 8th, 2012
- Food Prices Soaring in Iran as US Sanctions Miss Regime and Hit Civilians - February 8th, 2012
- House Hearings on Balochistan: Pakistan's Kosovo? - February 8th, 2012
- Syrian Opposition Claims Massive Deaths in Homs, Clashes Reported in Daraa - February 8th, 2012
- Egypt PM: US Aid Threats Won't Stop NGO Prosecutions - February 8th, 2012





Guest
January 9th, 2010 at 8:32 am
What a bunch of doorknobs! Can't wait until this mission implodes on these idiots.
Inspector Clouseau
January 9th, 2010 at 6:33 pm
Maybe there was some method to Obama's madness. If ISAF logistics can only support a certain number of troops, why quibble if the Pentagon wants double the possible amount.
The tactics…no, amateurs discuss tactics,…. Professional soldiers study logistics. – Tom Clancy, Red Storm Rising
River Rat
January 10th, 2010 at 3:58 pm
Looking up to be a disaster all bunched up in a pile, i could go on with a big list of problems,loss of troops for one and the way this terrain is set up only assessable by air. I know when a supply chopper is shoot down in a hot LZ your in a world of shit and no way to know when the next one can get there.