Wednesday’s bombing against a key CIA installation in Afghanistan’s Khost Province was the biggest loss suffered by the agency in over a quarter century, and has led to considerable speculation over who managed to hit such a secretive site that even the US military was calling it a “gym” full of “civilians” in the middle of a warzone.
It would be quite a coup for whichever group managed it, and interestingly enough, more than one group is claiming credit. The Afghan Taliban were first, claiming they had recruited a “disillusioned Afghan National Army soldier” to carry out the hit.
But not long after, the Tehreek-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP), a totally separate group, declared that they had recruited the attacker, who they described as a CIA asset.
Both stories have some measure of validity: it has been confirmed that the attack was in fact someone the CIA was recruiting to spy for them, while NATO also says the attacker was wearing an Afghan Army uniform. So which group actually did it?
Maybe either one, but maybe also neither one. Officials were quick to point their fingers at the Haqqani family, a group in Pakistan that has informal ties to the Afghan Taliban, and since the site was used to coordinate drone strikes (which have almost exclusively been against the Haqqanis) they seem to have the motivation.
Ouch, that must have some sting… I wonder if those killed were the ones flyin the drones…??
AFAIK, the drones are piloted from Langley, USA.
Isn't it completely clear, that those killed pc-gamers, themselves killing other people illegally, were legitimate targets for anyone claiming to protect civil legality?
The US, during the Nurenberg trials, upheld, that acting on orders was NOT a valid excuse for illegal wrongdoing. And since those murderers would probably be helped from their government connections, it was a NECESSITY and a civil DUTY to kill them before their government stepped in to defend them.
Also, it might help other such employees, to refuse illegal orders, with that action. That some other creep from the US government swear revenge, should of course immediately put him in jail. Preferably rendited so that he could be forced to reveal his connections, and thereby hinder new illegal murders by his drone fellows (during the next 24 hours, of course)
MONTIAIGNE I LOVE THOSE DRONES NO PILOTS GET HURT AND THE RAG HEADS SCRAMBLE LIKE PACK RATS ALSO ITS A QUICK WAY TOO SEE THEIR VERGENSI LOVE THE USA IF YOU ARE A AMERICAN GET THE HELL OUT SCUM BALL
You have a problem with the Caps Lock key. Please take your computer to a repair shop for expert help.
HEY HACK KISS UP TOO YOUR MUSLIM SCUM
Thanls to louis a goretti for posting a perfect example of the imperialist mentality: I am a loftier person, and always from the outset right, whenever i FEEL like it. Thus I am always right..
That he CLAIMS to know – with an absolutely certainty NOT TO KNOW to normal peoplet, hat he has gotten the faintest idea, if those drones mysteriously send fawltless signals back to the PC-game warriors, if the spotted people are mad terrorists – tells me about the quality of that person: arrogant and proudly posturing as somehow having the RIGHT to generally kill whomever irritates His Majesty. A real good support of international terrorism, if only by his stupidity.
Oh boy. So the ideal of removing of by definition fawltless superior Kings or Emperors, was to establish a whole society of Kings and Superiors?
The multiple, elastic stories that have been recounted regarding this news item are one more implausible than the next, each of which has been shifting unconvincingly over the past 24 hours.
Yeah, sure. A uniformed Afghan is "invited" to CIA headquarters, "for the first time", according to initial reports, body strapped with explosives. And *kaboom!* … Like hell.
There is, notably, however, a long-standing animosity between Special Operations Command [Rumsfeld's brainchild] and the CIA; the latter having complained repeatedly of violation of its turf by Special Ops, the two seemingly having been known to work at cross-purposes. Perhaps "Wet-job" McCrystal et Co would prefer to operate beyond the CIA's visual field … This recent act could also, or additionally, be a shot across the bow of the CIA's narcotic ship, in an effort to reclaim control over Afghanistan's several hundred $billion [market value] heroin production, which is disputed by a multitude of indigenous and international parties.
See: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&…
I hate the CIA, and I say good for them, too bad some one can't kill all of those fuckers.
This story reminds me of several old and new gems of wisdom, such as
HEY HACK WAR IS HELL IF THEY DIDNT MESS WITH US IN THE FIRST PLACE THEY MIGHT MEET WOMAN ON EARTH NOT VIRGENS IN THEIR OTHER WORLD
This story reminds me of several old and new gems of wisdom, such as; "as you sow, so shall you reap," and "what goes around, comes around," and "paybacks are hell." And speaking of "paybacks are hell," when one considers all of the CIA meddling in the Middle East since WWII, it is a wonder that the events of "911" didn't occur much sooner that they did. Yep, "blowback" is hell alright. The wages of empire.