UN Watchdog’s New Rules Likely to Ensure Karzai Win
Newly Published Rules Likely to Raise Further Accusations of Bias
In a move that seems to virtually ensure the victory of incumbent President Hamid Karzai, the UN-backed Election Complaints Commission (ECC) has published its new rules for handling the massive voter fraud in August’s election.
Under the rules, the ECC will invalidate ballots in suspicious boxes in proportion to the number cast for a candidate, regardless of who was responsible for the fraud. In short, if a Karzai supporter added 1,000 votes to a ballot box which split evenly with opponent Abdullah Abdullah, Karzai’s opponent would lose the same number of votes as Karzai did. Though fraud was disproportionately in Karzai-heavy districts it will likely still make it impossible for Karzai to lose enough votes to force a run-off.
This is bound to add further to accusations of a pro-Karzai bias by the UN mission. The second in command at the mission, fired last week for complaining about fraud, says he was ordered to cover up the extent of fraud on Karzai’s behalf.
The UN reportedly had evidence that one in three Karzai votes was fraudulent, though former ambassador Galbraith was ordered to keep this secret. The man doing the ordering, Kai Eide, reportedly told Karzai that he supported his re-election campaign.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Four Killed as Another US Drone Strike Hits Pakistan - February 8th, 2012
- Food Prices Soaring in Iran as US Sanctions Miss Regime and Hit Civilians - February 8th, 2012
- House Hearings on Balochistan: Pakistan's Kosovo? - February 8th, 2012
- Syrian Opposition Claims Massive Deaths in Homs, Clashes Reported in Daraa - February 8th, 2012
- Egypt PM: US Aid Threats Won't Stop NGO Prosecutions - February 8th, 2012





Tweets that mention UN Watchdog’s New Rules Likely to Ensure Karzai Win -- News from Antiwar.com -- Topsy.com
October 6th, 2009 at 11:16 am
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by nick cook. nick cook said: UN Watchdog’s New Rules Likely to Ensure http://bit.ly/27Elf0 via @addthis [...]
MvGuy
October 6th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Has the U.N. been emboldened to the extent that they fix elections in our faces?? What happened to
sneak-thief-ism or is smash and grab more fashionable these days in Afghanistan..??????? Nice to see that the U.N. is so transparent in abetting the fraud. It reminds me of Larry Silverstein's smirk when he tells how they "decided to pullit"
MvGuy
October 6th, 2009 at 8:50 pm
Has the U.N. been emboldened to the extent that they fix elections in our faces?? What happened to
sneak-thief-ism or is smash and grab more fashionable these days in Afghanistan..??????? Nice to see that the U.N. is so transparent in abetting the fraud. It reminds me of Larry Silverstein's smirk when he tells how they "decided to pullit"
MvGuy
October 6th, 2009 at 8:51 pm
Has the U.N. been emboldened to the extent that they fix elections in our faces?? What happened to
sneak-thief-ism……or is smash and grab more fashionable these days in Afghanistan..??????? Nice to see that the U.N. is so transparent in abetting the fraud. It reminds me of Larry Silverstein's smirk when he tells how they "decided to pullit"
MvGuy
October 6th, 2009 at 8:51 pm
Has the U.N. been emboldened to the extent that they fix elections in our faces?? What happened to
sneak-thief-ism……or is smash and grab more fashionable these days in Afghanistan..??????? Nice to see that the U.N. is so transparent in abetting the fraud. It reminds me of Larry Silverstein's smirk when he tells how they "decided to pullit"
MvGuy
October 6th, 2009 at 8:52 pm
Has the U.N. been emboldened to the extent that they fix elections in our faces??……..What happened to sneak-thief-ism……or is smash and grab more fashionable these days in Afghanistan..??????? Nice to see that the U.N. is so transparent in abetting the fraud. It reminds me of Larry Silverstein's smirk when he tells how they "decided to pullit"
MvGuy
October 6th, 2009 at 8:53 pm
Has the U.N. been emboldened to the extent that they fix elections in our faces??……..What happened to sneak-thief-ism……or is smash and grab more fashionable these days in Afghanistan ..??????? Nice to see that the U.N. is so transparent in abetting the fraud. It reminds me of Larry Silverstein's smirk when he tells how they "decided to pullit"
drmkrueger
October 9th, 2009 at 9:23 am
In my view it is a far reaching scandal that Kai Eide is still in power. He has to resign, the faster, the better! The UN should reinstall Mr. Gailbraith who has all the civil courage that is urgently needed in international organisations working in Afghanistan.
Also President Karzai has to resign. According to the estimates up to 30 % for the votes for him have been manipulated. Even ten % should be sufficient to kick him out of the presidency!
Michael
Karzai Lauds Election as ‘Victory’ for Afghan People -- News from Antiwar.com
October 13th, 2009 at 4:53 pm
[...] UN’s Election Complaints Commission, which Karzai is expressing such concerns about, announced only last week new rules governing its recount that would virtually ensure that no level of fraud would force Karzai to endure a second round of [...]