US Eyes ‘Joint Patrols’ to Keep Presence in Iraq’s Cities
US Patrols Regarded With Suspicion by Iraqi Forces, Civilians
Since its June 30 pullout from Iraq’s cities, US troops have found it increasingly difficult to conduct patrols in the cities. All such patrols will have to be joint, but Iraqi forces have declined to allow them access to many cities, including Baghdad. Patrols that have gone without accompanying Iraqi forces have been publicly condemned.
But now, though violence hasn’t really gotten any worse since the pullback, the US is redoubling its effots to secure the joint patrols, particularly in Mosul. The new excuse is monitoring reconstruction projects, monitoring which they claim is vital for the Iraqi economy.
Iraqi forces, however, remain reluctant to allow the patrols into the cities, and even when they get there the residents are not exactly welcoming them with open arms. Though the US determination to get at least some of its 132,000 troops into Iraq’s cities is unlikely to vanish, it seems that going forward they will be clashing with Iraq’s equally strong determination to see them remain out of sight as much as possible.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- No Deal: US Restarted Pakistan Drone Strikes Despite Objections - February 22nd, 2012
- Syrian National Council Demands Foreign Invasion - February 22nd, 2012
- State Dept.: Pakistani Taliban 'Not Welcome' at Truce Talks - February 22nd, 2012
- Israeli FM: Our Decision to Attack Iran None of US, Russia's Business - February 22nd, 2012
- Hunger Strike Ends, but Adnan's Detention Without Charges Doesn't - February 22nd, 2012





US Eyes ‘Joint Patrols’ to Keep Presence in Iraq’s Cities « Dr Nasir Khan
July 29th, 2009 at 1:05 am
[...] Patrols Regarded With Suspicion by Iraqi Forces, Civilians by Jason Ditz, Antiwar.com, July 28, [...]
The America 20xy News Service » Blog Archive » US Troops Back on Patrol in Iraq Cities
July 29th, 2009 at 2:45 am
[...] Anti-War.com [...]
curmudgeonvt
July 29th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
OK, so they really don't want us there anymore – if they ever did. So, why stay? What are the real reasons we're still there. I haven't heard anything cogent yet. If they want complete control of their own country (novel idea, eh?) then give it to them. Surely we really don't care what happens after we leave. Don't we have big enough problems of our own that need to be addressed? Time to end this empire thing. But, that's just this old curmudgeon's opinion…
matthewgood.org » Archive » Staying Inside The Fence
July 29th, 2009 at 11:28 am
[...] the public referendum on the SOFA agreement looms, the Iraqi public is already showing its position with regards to the presence of US troops in cities following the June 30 enactment… “Since its [...]
Obama's army forces itself on Iraq, even though they want us OUT! - Politics and Other Controversies - City-Data Forum
July 29th, 2009 at 5:11 pm
[...] [...]
Obama's army forces itself on Iraq, even though they want us OUT! - Politics and Other Controversies - Page 2 - City-Data Forum
July 30th, 2009 at 6:36 am
[...] [...]
Obama's army forces itself on Iraq, even though they want us OUT! - Politics and Other Controversies - Page 2 - City-Data Forum
July 31st, 2009 at 5:27 pm
[...] Iraq’s equally strong determination to see them remain out of sight as much as possible. US Eyes ‘Joint Patrols’ to Keep Presence in Iraq’s Cities — News from Antiwar.com "Related Article:", July 29: Gates: US May Speed Pullout if Iraq Leaders Curb Feuds [...]
Surprise! The Taliban Can Fight Like We Can — U.S. Marine | America at War
August 4th, 2009 at 4:57 am
[...] Pentagon announced that it pulled our troops out of Iraqi cities by the June 30 deadline, but it lied (the Pentagon has acquired a habit of lying like the Israelis, who lie like other people blink). [...]