The House on Tuesday passed a resolution that says “anti-Zionism is antisemitism,” the chamber’s latest piece of legislation conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism.
The resolution, which is presented as a resolution condemning antisemitism, passed in a vote of 314-14-92. Only thirteen Democrats and one Republican voted against the legislation, while 92 Democrats voted “present” in protest of a line buried in the bill that explicitly claims anti-Zionism is antisemitism.
The Republican-drafted resolution declares that the House of Representatives “clearly and firmly states that anti-Zionism is antisemitism.”
Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), the most senior Jewish member of the House, criticized the language of the bill ahead of the vote. “The resolution suggests that ALL anti-Zionism is antisemitism. That is either intellectually disingenuous or just factually wrong. And it unfairly implicates many of my orthodox former constituents in Brooklyn, many of whose families rose from the ashes of the Holocaust,” he said.
Nadler claimed that “most anti-Zionism is antisemitism” but added that if authors of the bill “were at all familiar with Jewish history and culture, should know about Jewish anti-Zionism that was, and is, expressly NOT antisemitic.”
“This resolution ignores the fact that even today, certain orthodox Hasidic Jewish communities—the Satmars in New York and others—as well as adherents of the pre-state Jewish labor movement have held views that are at odds with the modern Zionist conception,” he said.
While coming out strongly against the language, Nadler voted “present” instead of “no.” The thirteen Democrats who voted against the bill include Reps. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY), Cori Bush (D-MO), Gerald E. Connolly (D-VA), Jesús García (D-IL), Raúl M. Grijalva (D-AZ), Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), Summer Lee (D-PA), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), Delia Ramirez (D-IL), Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ), and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI).
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) was the only Republican to vote against the bill. Last week, he was the lone member of Congress to vote against a resolution that claimed “denying Israel’s right to exist is a form of antisemitism.” Explaining his opposition, Massie said the resolution also equated anti-Zionism with antisemitism, although not as explicitly as the bill passed on Tuesday.
Let me get this straight. Now if I want to critique Zionism, which is currently involved in slaughtering infants and has been doing this for seven weeks, I’m somehow an “anti-semite”???? No, you fucking idiots, I am not! We MUST make intelligent distinctions, not this stupidity.
Well, when it comes to the US-Israeli love fest, you just can’t fix The Stupid.
No, because Congress does not have the power to define language and you have a right to free speech. This was just a severe case of pandering with zero substance.
I think they absolutely can define language as least as far as the law goes.
No, they really can’t. In all but a very few cases, the 1st Amendment makes that impermissible.
But anyway, this resolution has nothing to do with law. It’s paying lip service to the Zionists who are crucially important to so many political careers in the US.
There’s a caveat for gov’t employees and termination on what is considered hate speech:
It should further be noted that individuals employed by the Federal Government are not allowed to discriminate against any members of a protective class. Therefore, any speech representing hostility or disdain for a member of a protected class, may not be illegal but may result in the dismissal of the employee making such statements.
Members of a protected class are identified by:
Age (applies primarily to those aged 40 years and above)
Sex
Race
Religion
Handicap (whether visibly apparent or not)
Veteran status
Country of origin (this includes a person’s citizenship status)
If allegations of hateful speech are proven, a person found guilty of discriminating against one of the above groups would not be legally charged with hateful speech but could be declared guilty of discrimination and summarily dismissed from work.
https://thelawdictionary.org/article/the-legalities-of-hate-speech/
The reference you cite really isn’t applicable. There isn’t a chance in the world that a US court would accept an argument that voicing opposition to Zionism is hate speech and an appeals court would uphold a ruling based on such a finding.
Government employees are indeed subject to speech limitations. So are employees in the private sector, where employers can certainly fire workers for speech of which employers disapprove. A key difference is that government employers are subject to the 1st Amendment and private employers are not.
The Supreme Court has ruled that public employees cannot be punished or fired for speaking on issues of public concern as private individuals, especially when the speech does not relate to their job duties. Speech in the context of and employee’s job duties is not necessarily protected, nor is an employee’s speech which causes disruption in the workplace. For an example of the legal reasoning, see Garcetti v. Ceballos 547 US 210 (2006).
Making arguments or voting against funding for Israel’s Zionist government could fall under that being “job duties”. They censured one person who opposed. What’s next after this stupid vote?
Are you speaking about elected officials, about representatives in Congress? I’m sorry, but the notion that this idiotic resolution could in any way have any impact on the speech or votes of representatives is preposterous.
Review Article I, Section 6, Clause 1 of the Constitution and the related case law.
Ah, speech and debate clause?
Yes.
Ty
Courts don’t really provide protection. Real life is you can get fired, take your case all the way to the top and win and next day get fired again and have to do it all over.
They probably won’t ever defend Christians huh?
But anyway, this resolution has nothing to do with law.
Yet.
Which is why they, like all tyrants, hate anonymity. It makes it just a bit harder for them to use violence against those who say things they don’t like. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBUOJBYixGo
Maybe, but nary a step from hate crime designation, more surveillance and censorship.
Only if you actually give a **** what the traitors infesting the capitol have to say about anything. Now don’t go associating your real name with anything; they still are ready willing and able to mete out violence to those who irk them.
But understand that their labels are about as meaningful to the real world as Pokemon types are meaningful to bio-diversity in the boreal forest.
This resolution is a piece of theater, utilizing antisemitism as protection of murderous Zionist policy, which it does not address.
It also creates bias by limiting its first condition or “whereas” to only one side of the question:
“Whereas acts of hate, intimidation, discrimination, and violence based on ethnicity or religion have no place in our country nor in the global community;”
This condition applies to a number of items that follow, such as an example of Jewish persons being attacked, but entirely ignores its application to Zionist Israel and the murder of innocent civilians and children.
It then concludes in its resolutions:
(1) strongly condemns and denounces all instances of antisemitism occurring in the United States and globally;
(2) reaffirms and reiterates its strong support for the Jewish community at home and abroad;
(3) calls on elected officials and world leaders to condemn and fight all forms of domestic and global antisemitism;
(4) clearly and firmly states that anti-Zionism is antisemitism; and
(5) rejects all forms of terror, hate, discrimination, and harassment of members of the Jewish community.
Not only does the resolution associate critique of Zionism with antisemitism, which is false analogy, it does not include in its further “whereas” conditions the current activities of Zionism as demonstration of “hate, intimidation, and violence based on ethnicity or religion.”
Nor does it include Zionist dehumanization such as referring to the Palestinians as “animals” and “little snakes.”
It is thus flawed, incomplete, and biased. It is a weak piece of argumentation which has apparently entirely duped most members of the House of Representatives.
Resolutions 1 and 3 are reasonable.
Resolution 2 suggests bias.
Resolution 4 is outright bunk, confusing antisemitism with critique of political and military programs.
Resolution 5 should extend to “all members of the human community,” not be confined to the Jewish community.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-resolution/894/text
Both preposterous and dangerous. Not at all a good look.
But a real demonstration of the power of the Israel lobby.
not even remotely surprising
Well, isn’t that cute, free speech doesn’t count when it comes to Israeli. All the D.C. boys and girls and talking heads like Sean Hannity fall in line with their Israeli must be supported, no questions asked.
Right. “Free speech squealers” find their snowflake spot.
Well, isn’t that cute, free speech doesn’t count when it comes to Israeli. All the D.C. boys and girls and talking heads like Sean Hannity fall in line with their Israeli must be supported, no questions asked.
The Thought Police will stop at nothing to shovel this load under the carpet. But it won’t work as it has in the past.
In my opinion, this quote from – Matt Hoh, Former Marine and US Government Official, Expert on America’s Wars says everything that needs to be said.
“You know, Judge, I have always resisted the use of the term evil… because it is a subjective term. And I hear it over and over again, and I personally am scarred by the fact that 15 years ago you couldn’t go through an office in Washington D. D., or through an office in the Pentagon without seeing plaques that read: Evil prospers when good men do nothing. It was a mantra that enabled this sense of righteousness within the US government that allowed for, say, the invasion and destruction of Iraq. So, I have been hesitant to use that term… to describe something as evil. But in the last 2 months, I have reversed myself on that. The gross inhumanity shown by Admiral Kirby, the willingness to lie, the smugness in which it’s all contained as tens of thousands of people have been killed, buried under rubble, uh, uh, the destruction. All these videos that we see every day, that we are witnessing with, I guess our lying eyes, according to Kirby and others… things which we have never seen, we (thought we) would never see again, but will see again tomorrow as they drop more 𝘼𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙨𝙪𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙤𝙢𝙗𝙨 onto southern Gaza, right, in these places that were supposedly safe… So, all the lies, all the half-truths, all the disingenuous nature of it…. talked into killing. I don’t know how to describe it as anything 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 than evil. And so I have found it to be very profound in… this, I’ve done it my whole life, this study of war, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐈 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐰𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐧𝐨𝐰… and I’ve seen a lot of things obviously, right?
As with so many other posts here: I just cannot get past the headline.
Someone hand me a barf bag!
The issue in contention is a fasicst government led by a psycho-killer gone rogue doing a genocide on about two million or so people.
How is that supposed to be “anti-semitic”?
Supporting that in any way, shape, or form is “anti-human.”
How about a US law that states that anti-US is anti-Christianism?
IOW the whole thing is stupid, as noted by others.
How long before the Swamp makes it a federal crime to criticize Israel in any way? Because you know that’s where we are heading.
They could try just like they did with the BDS Boycott issue … and then, if there’s any lawsuit, they would lose.
to the House of Misrepresentatives: up yours.
They have nothing else to do…!
The No votes (all Dems except for Massie):
Bush – Missouri
Connolly – Virginia
García (IL) – Illinois
Grijalva – Arizona
Jayapal – Washington
Lee (PA) – Pennsylvania
Massie – Kentucky
Ocasio-Cortez – New York
Omar – Minnesota
Pressley – Massachusetts
Ramirez – Illinois
Tlaib – Michigan
Watson Coleman – New Jersey
Most Dem and Rep votes were yes. It has been said in the past, and I think proven, that some Dems are allowed to go against the grain if it will pass without them. I do, however, think that Massie’s vote is principle.
I don’t think the “counting noses” to make sure your vote doesn’t matter applies here. The same names keep popping up when it comes to opposing the genocide. And bravo for Massie.
Not really:
Just 2 House members did not vote in favor of a resolution affirming Israel’s right to exist
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/just-2-house-members-did-not-vote-in-favor-of-a-resolution-affirming-israels-right-to-exist/ar-AA1kGZfg
I don’t think that applies.
How so?
I didn’t get the connection.
You were saying that group was consistent. They actually aren’t.
I said their names keep popping up when it comes to being opposed to the ongoing genocide. And they do. I don’t think the vote on Israel’s right to exist changes that. One can be for Israel’s right to exist and be opposed to their actions. The two aren’t mutually exclusive.
“Denying Israel’s right to exist is a form of antisemitism” is in that resolution they signed.
It’s a variation of saying antiZionism is antisemitism.
Israel is zionist. Why do you have to commit to Zionism having a right to exist or else you are antisemitic?
The wording is attached to tweet:
https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1729656551596564812
But Massie, yes.
AOC, especially, is a fraud:
Ocasio-Cortez says pro-Palestinian demonstrations should be “shut down” as opposition to Israeli war crimes grows
11 October 2023
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/10/11/rwvd-o11.html
That’s one of 12. And it doesn’t necessarily prove that she voted against this bill only because she knew it would pass regardless.
They’ve been playing this game for a while.
Yes, both parties play this game, I certainly don’t deny that. I just don’t think the vast majority of the no votes on this bill were because those people were only voting the way they did because they knew it would pass regardless. I can’t prove that. It’s just an opinion.
“If you want to know who rules you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” –Voltaire
+++
That quote is actually from Kevin Alfred Strom, an American neo-nazi and white supremacist in 1993.
https://www.azquotes.com/author/15138-Voltaire
Mary I do not know how to attached a website. I googled the quote, which took me to Reuters fact check. The actual quote: “To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?” A 2017 essay written by Kevin Strom titled, “Voltaire Didn’t Say It” takes ownership of the quote.
In all my google search, I still have not found out why Major Danny Sjursen has basically disappear
I did a little asking around — he hasn’t written much if any for the last year and a half or so, apparently due to personal issues of some kind. I do hope he gets back to it!
The last post that I know of was February, 2022. I have his book, “Ghost Riders of Baghdad”
It doesn’t matter who the quote is attributed to, as the quote is right on the mark. I have been wondering about Danny Sjursen’s disappearance also.
I agree
see? the congress opposes american people.
It’s politically expedient to pass laws without debate. In this case, is Zionism defined, much less anti-semitism? It’s doubtful. A vast majority of Americans are UNABLE to define Zionism and feel uncomfortable with the subject, considering the subject itself as anti-semitic. Try polling your friends. Those who are conversant with the subject usually reject Zionism. It sounds crazy but even supporters of Israel will often say they are not Zionists! That’s because the subject is never really debated freely. There is deep bias on both sides, even hysteria. The same goes for defining anti-semitism. Who has the right to say if a person is anti semitic or not? And what is the best response to accusations of anti-semitism? Look what happened to Corbyn or Musk when they tried to protest the accusations of anti semitism. The root cause of the conflict has to do with Zionism. Yet never is this subject really debated. It’s time for this to change.
I would be careful with Musk. I’m beginning to consider x as a limited hangout.
IDENTITY VERIFICATION OR DATA EXPOSURE? TWITTER USING ISRAELI TECH FIRM HEADED BY EX-MILITARY OFFICIALS TO VERIFY USERS
Didn’t the US just announce a policy to ban violent settlers?
Isn’t that a bit anti-Zionist?
this has me so confused.
Of course that depends on how they define “Zionism”. The wish to live in Zion? OK, but under what circumstances? By stealing the land and homes of those who are already there, which is happening? No way with me.
I have been seriously attacked for my views on Zionism. The time has come to answer. Find my mom Erika Heymann on Google. She is a Righteous Among the Nations. My sister and I who assisted our mother at the time were accidentally left off by the sponsors. Our hiders depended on me to do the right thing. I now ask the peo0ple of Israel to do the right thing. Stop your settlers from stealing land in the name of Zionism.
Zionism is a branch of Nazism… Most of Israel rabbis are anti-zionist… This makes them antiemetic and pro Nazi people…!?
But there is an election coming up and they have to act as if they work and do their job. Next week they will take a vacation until 2024, working to get money to get elected. BIBI will watch the shop until they return next year if he will be around. The nation is in good hands. /s
As expected from a paid and bought congress, as long as the money rolls in they do what they are told to do. Why bother with elections? I know, I don’t anymore, not even locally. It is the fasted way to become millionaires. See the Genocide Joe’s family gang.
Nadler certainly knows about this Rabbi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIX368TtOJs
So we’re all anti-Semites now? Embrace it! That’s the only way to show them that their word games stop at the door of the idiotic Congress.
Most US elites speak with forked tongues because that’s how they think;
Israel can’t defeat Hamas in battle, so what’s next?
After a seven-day lull in the war between Israel and the Palestinian armed groups in Gaza, the resumption of hostilities has been given another green light from Washington. Having failed to lead its Israeli allies towards military victory, the US is permitting a dangerous escalation and rejects a peaceful solution that will prevent further civilian suffering.
Just minutes after the departure of US Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, from Palestine/Israel, the war in Gaza resumed, with a large aerial onslaught on Palestinian civilian infrastructure resulting in the deaths of nearly 200 civilians. The White House spokesperson John Kirby announced continued support for Israel’s “right and responsibility to go after Hamas,” but to what end is unclear. As the likes of former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak admits that Hamas is far from falling apart, it begs the question: what really is the point of this war?
Following six weeks of war that resulted in likely over 20,000 Palestinian deaths, the Israeli military has failed to produce any evidence that it has made a significant dent on the military capabilities of Hamas and the other Palestinian armed groups in the besieged coastal enclave. While Israel forced its way into the major hospitals in northern Gaza, claiming that Hamas was using the sites as bases and command-and-control centers, the evidence produced by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) does not support these allegations. The US government backed the idea that a command node had existed at the Shifa Hospital, and when the Israeli forces entered the hospital compound they presented weapons they claimed to have found there, as well as an empty tunnel. Any such images released to the public are curated and edited by the Israeli army, but if independently verified, they could serve as evidence of militant presence – still, not proof of a control center or node. Little of note was discovered in other hospitals, and American claims of having solid intel that confirms Israeli claims is dubious, considering previous public statements such as US President Joe Biden’s words about having seen “confirmed pictures of terrorists beheading children” which the White House later had to walk back.
At the start of this war, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that his government was going to “crush Hamas,” a goal that the US government backed publicly. Yet, Hamas has managed to not only inflict the largest blow against Israel in its history, but has also defended Gaza on the ground with countless documented cases of success against Israeli forces. The whole world is now talking about the formation of a Palestinian State, an idea that had been all but abandoned in favor of unconditional normalization agreements between Arab States and Israel, prior to the war. In addition to this, one of the predictable outcomes of the Israeli war on Gaza, has been a tremendous uptick in support for Hamas throughout the occupied territories. In the Middle East and throughout the Muslim World, Hamas militants have become heroes and are widely viewed as a valiant national resistance.
The Saudi-Israeli normalization deal, which the Biden administration’s Middle East policy revolved around, is dead in the water at this time as Riyadh moves closer to Tehran. According to Israeli polling data, Benjamin Netanyahu is only trusted by 4% of Israelis, while the most trusted national figure was recorded to be Israeli military spokesperson Daniel Hagari. Hagari, despite being trusted by Israelis, was turned into the “there is a list guy” and an online meme, after presenting a video in which he claimed a regular Arabic calendar named “terrorists”. That video, in which he referred to the list, was supposed to show evidence of Hamas keeping hostages at the Rantisi Children’s Hospital.
At least 10 countries have either withdrawn ambassadors from, or suspended ties with, Israel. All this as the largest pro-Palestinian protests to have ever taken place in the West continue to occur in capital cities like London and Washington DC. This, combined with a considerable drop in Joe Biden’s approval rating, all spell disaster for the US-supported war in Gaza.
The White House claims that it is putting certain restrictions on the Israeli army as it plans to invade the south of Gaza, but in the same breath offers unconditional support for Israel’s actions. At no point has the US government taken any responsibility for what has happened since October 7, there has been no apology for their lies, no change in strategy and no acknowledgement in the role that Washington has played in creating the situation on the ground in Gaza that facilitated the Hamas attack.
The real question now is: Where do we go from here? Israel aimlessly fights in Gaza and continues to kill thousands of Palestinian civilians, there is no sign of a Hamas defeat on the horizon and the humanitarian situation, which is described as “the worst ever” by UN Relief Chief Martin Griffiths, is further deteriorating. While these elements are all to be taken seriously, there is also the specter of a regional war erupting in the event that the Israeli attack escalates against Gaza. Lebanese Hezbollah is currently engaged in frequent battles along the Lebanese border and has been expanding the scope of its attacks on Israeli military targets.
The Gaza truce is a sign that Hamas can’t be defeated
The prisoner exchanges which took place between Israel and Hamas proved that the Palestinian group was capable of being engaged diplomatically. The exchange also worked to expose to the world that Israel was also holding women and children captive without any charges. Israeli civilian captives who were released, the majority of whom were filmed smiling, shaking the hands of and thanking Hamas fighters upon their releases, have been blocked from speaking to the media about their experiences directly. On the other hand, Palestinian women and children recounted abuse, torture and humiliation that they had suffered at the hands of their Israeli jailers. This represented another public-relations debacle for the Israeli government, who came off looking more guilty than Hamas.
The US government is in the driver’s seat of the war. It has the power to end the conflict at any time but continues to prolong this disaster. During the seven-day pause in hostilities, nothing shifted in Israel’s favor to make its victory possible. There can be no military solution to the war in Gaza, the US must recognise that this conflict will never end until the Palestinian people are granted justice and freedom. For 75 years the governments of the collective West have ignored the suffering of the Palestinian people, they have never been objective peace-brokers. Violence begets violence and hate begets hate, it is not possible to simply murder the Palestinians into submission. Even if Hamas were to be defeated, there will be more groups that emerge to take revenge for their fallen and fight for statehood in the future. If the international community comes together, this cycle can be broken, but it is going to take courage.
https://www.rt.com/news/588481-idf-israel-war-gaza/
This is wrong and it will not stand up in court at all.
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) was the only Republican to vote against the bill.
In the great tradition of Robert “Mr. Republican” Taft… He cast the lone vote against the Japanese American Incarceration Act during WW2.
A man never stands so tall as when he stands alone.
Massie for President! 🇺🇸
Since they all are corrupt one takes his vote with a grain of salt, he took no risk, but he can look at his face in the mirror.
He’s about the only face I can trust.
To be honest, I don’t know much about him.
Bloody hell!
“ was even accused (not for the first time) of being an anti-Semite and a Holocaust denier by a Christian attendee. I also found out later that the label “jihadist” was used to vilify me in some Israeli websites whose mission is to mark and label as “traitors” Jewish people, and particularly Israeli Jews, critical of Israel.
The accusation of being a Holocaust denier is beyond the grotesque. I was named Yosefa after my mother’s father Yosef, who was murdered in Treblinka, perhaps the most horrific Nazi extermination camp in Poland. My mother was the only survivor of her family”
https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2023/12/4/gaza-as-a-global-metaphor-for-reclaiming-justice
You can attack the messenger all you want.
“To know who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize,” once said the American neo-Nazi and Holocaust denier Kevin Strom.
“That is either intellectually disingenuous or just factually wrong.”
It could be both…!
Also – anyone know ? How does this not violate the Establishment Clause ?
Wikipedia : “The Establishment Clause…By it, the federal government of the United States and, by later extension, the governments of all U.S. states and U.S. territories, are prohibited from establishing or sponsoring religion.”
Sounds a LOT like federal sponsorship of Judaism to me.
At least the swine who voted in favor were at least honest…
Those moral midgets who voted “present” aren’t even worthy of a place in hell. Wherever they belong it ought to be dark and cold.
Voting “present” = going on the record as being there, seeing stupid s**t happen, and doing NOTHING to stop it.
Who knows, maybe this is one of those nonsense symbolic actions with no legal teeth ? Gov’ts seem to pass more of those than actual laws when in session a portion if the calendar year.
Thomas Massie on Glenn Greenwald’s “System Update” show:
If Semitism means a country should be led by an indicted corrupt leader who bombs civilians and children, regularly detains another ethnic group without charges, encourages the stealing of homes and condones torture…well, I am at a loss to understand. It certainly isn’t the Jews I know.
The House needs to remember that our country was founded on Freedom of Speech. Criticizing Israel is the right of each and every American. We are footing the bill, we have every right to say how we feel about the way it is put to use! In addition, if any elected US official efforts to put limits on said freedoms, we will remember that, when we are voting. As a tax paying US citizen, this is my ABSOLUTE RIGHT.
Have they really thought this through? I know that they want this:
Antisemitism is bad.
Antizionism is antisemitism.
Therefore antizionism is bad.
But Israel’s evil conduct leads many people to think antizionism is good. So we get:
Antizionism is good
Antizionism is antisemitism.
Therefore antisemitism is good.
Do they really want people to come to that conclusion?
There are many who are not semitics or Jews especially among Christian evangelicals claim to be zionists. On the other hand, many jews oppose zionism and the state of Israel.
Zionism is no more Jewish than the Borgia papacy was Christian.
Is saying that Jesus Christ is the King of Zion considered antisemitism?
Soooo glad!!! It’s nothing BUT.