The Kremlin said on Wednesday that Russia was waiting for the details of the talks between the US and Ukraine that were held in Saudi Arabia a day earlier before responding to the proposed 30-day ceasefire.
“Yesterday, both Secretary of State Marco Rubio and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz mentioned that they would provide us with detailed information about the essence of the conversation that took place in Jeddah through various channels. We need to receive this information first,” said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, according to Russia’s TASS news agency.
Peskov also said Russia is “examining the statements made following the negotiations carefully, and we are getting acquainted with the text of the joint statement adopted in Jeddah.”
The joint US-Ukraine statement said Ukraine had “expressed readiness to accept the US proposal to enact an immediate, interim 30-day ceasefire, which can be extended by mutual agreement of the parties, and which is subject to acceptance and concurrent implementation by the Russian Federation.”
Russia has previously expressed opposition to the idea of a temporary ceasefire with Ukraine, and Russian sources told Reuters that it would be hard for Russian President Vladimir Putin to accept the ceasefire without any real guarantees since he has the advantage on the battlefield.
The US also resumed weapons shipments and intelligence sharing with Ukraine, which had been briefly paused. Russia might view the 30-day ceasefire as an opportunity for Ukraine to stabilize its defensive lines and rearm.
The US and Russia are expected to hold talks on the details of the proposal this week, and the Kremlin said a phone call between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin is possible.
CIA Director John Ratcliffe spoke with Sergey Naryshkin, head of Russia’s SVR foreign intelligence service, on Wednesday, but it’s unclear if they discussed the ceasefire proposal. According to the SVR, the two officials “discussed the issues of interaction of both intelligence agencies in areas of common interest and the settlement of crisis situations.”
The SVR said Ratcliffe and Naryshkin agreed “on maintaining regular contact between the SVR and CIA directors with the aim of facilitating international stability and security and reducing confrontation in relationships between Moscow and Washington.”
Napolitano and Lavrov
https://rumble.com/v6qj1js-judgingfreedom.html?e9s=src_v1_upp
In case of difficulty with accent or hearing:
Lavrov-Napolitano full interview script
https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/2002637/
You can only hear the Truths and Facts 5000 miles away from US…!
While Ukraine has agreed to a 30-day ceasefire, Russia launched air strikes targeting Kyiv and other parts of Ukraine.
Putin says he can wait for his puppet to bungle the deal.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/cd0b6766c9d696683f8d5cba5a2482ab58ecacf6e4459bba4ff6b79220127fc2.png
While Ukraine was agreeing to a 30 day ceasefire with their proxy master that only benefits them and while they were being kicked out of Kursk, their small puppet clown in Kiev launched airstrikes on Moscow.
While Ukraine was agreeing to a 30 day ceasefire, you defend your beloved war criminal master like a proxy moron.
I don't see much reason to think war criminals are your problem at all. If that were the case you are helping create your own problem. You wouldn't be thàt stupid, now would you? I mean on purpose?
RT's editorial article:
‘A ceasefire only benefits those who are retreating’: Russia’s top foreign relations experts and actors react to US-Ukraine talks
https://www.rt.com/russia/614082-russia-ukraine-ceasefire-experts/
Primakov: What’s ours is ours, and what’s yours – we’ll talk about that later. That’s pretty much Trump’s famous “art of the deal” in a nutshell.
(…) what is clear and directly follows from President Putin’s statements, is that we have very specific conditions for any peace agreement. A mere ceasefire won’t satisfy us; we need a resolution that addresses our interests and acknowledges the fundamental reasons behind the conflict.
These include Ukraine’s neutral status, the rights of ethnic Russians, and our territories in the Donetsk People’s Republic, Lugansk People’s Republic, Kherson, and Zaporozhye regions. Under any circumstances, Ukraine must not pose a threat to Russia. This means we must prevent any risks of revanchism, which logically entails that Ukraine should not maintain offensive military capabilities or embrace an aggressive Nazi ideology aimed against Russia. Therefore, it will be necessary to dismantle several political and social institutions of the current Ukraine, and the education system must also be reformed.
Markov:
Reasons why Russia might refuse a ceasefire:
1. A ceasefire would be exploited by the West and Ukraine to halt the advance of the Russian army, strip it of its initiative, supply the Ukrainian army with more weapons, continue extensive mobilization in Ukraine, and strengthen the repressive and anti-Russian nature of the Ukrainian political regime
2. The experience of the Minsk 1 and Minsk 2 agreements clearly demonstrates this pattern
3. The consistent dishonesty of Western politicians and media regarding the conflict, as well as their refusal to acknowledge their own and Ukraine’s culpability, strongly suggests that history will repeat itself
4. Russian President Vladimir Putin and other Russian officials have repeatedly stated that what Russia needs is lasting peace, not just a temporary ceasefire
5. The West cannot really be trusted
6. Russia is advancing. A ceasefire always benefits those who are retreating.
Dugin:
Trump is eager to end the war in Ukraine because his opponents from the Deep State have regrouped and launched a massive counterattack against him and Elon Musk. However, he has no clear plan on how to achieve this; he is simply not ready to withdraw from the war unilaterally yet. (…)
A ceasefire is not a serious proposition, especially when Ukraine is clearly starting to lose.
Bogdanov: Washington has yet to present any concrete proposals.
To the first and second point speaks that the EU and Western European countries have rejected the demilitarization of Ukraine as part of any solution. In accordance with this they continue to daily with the utmost persistence volunteer evidence for points 3 and 5, stating that they are trying to continue the war until at least 2029 preferably 2030 and shedding the pretence altogether, bluntly saying they prefer war in Ukraine over peace. (Mette Frederiksen is hardly an outlier.)
And indeed from the Russian side the message has been very consistent that what is needed is a solution that addresses the root of the conflict, not a ceasefire as an introduction to a Minsk 3, that the Europeans have already stated to want to use to arm Ukraine.
The ball is not at all in Russia's court (the nonsensical talking point being drummed into our heads today) the ball has been stabbed and the deflated skin has been thrown over the lines into the public
Either the Trump administration does not know what they're doing or they are. Both are equally bad. And if they don't course correct quickly or if he doesn't walk away very, very soon Trump is going to own this war. And given Trump's infantile psychology we could end up fairly quickly in WWIII.
I think that they know what they’re doing: pretend. Trump is 99% about domestic consumption for his MAGA base and related wealthy donors. He’s a salesman, a con man, not a the statesman that his followers imagine.
It does like that, like there is no clear line of thinking, no thought through strategy, no consistency behind the American approach to this supposedly brilliant Trumpian 'deal'making process. From the outside it looks like improvised chaos: a mixture of posture, impulsivity and self-delusion interspersed with a few sprinkles of reality.
And there is apparently no shortage of Trump whisperers, who feel their purpose in life has become to explain the deeply hidden brilliance manifesting itself outwardly as pompous stupidity as part of his genius.
And there is apparently no shortage "useful idiots" in the Putin Fan Club.
He needs to pretend he tried to bring peace to Ukraine… and failed. Blame the Russians afterwards, that’s what Rubio is saying.
^this!!
Nonsensical talking points are your long suit.
Russia has violated all international agreements with Ukraine from the NPT to Minsk, and your infantile psychology is to defend the wanted war criminal.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b5cce7f73a9a6227279b860fef85cb25654d64c8143b6e91ecbbd017a12a53a8.jpg
When the Ukrainians are all dead, don't think you are going to use Romanian stooges as the next cannon fodder
European ‘coalition of the willing’ to guarantee Ukraine’s security.
Your brain cells are all dead.
Around 6.3 million Ukrainian refugees are registered across Europe and 6.8 million worldwide as of January 2025.
Don't think Putin will succeed in recreating the Soviet Union.
War criminal Putin has to use North Korean stooges for cannon fodder.
"The ball is not at all in Russia's court…the ball has been stabbed and the deflated skin has been thrown over the lines into the public"
Yea but there was more that did not get reported. Then the ball got steamrolled into a circle the size of a inflatable child's wading pool. And then it got lit on fire so there was like a ton'a burnt rubber stench and black smoke. And then they glued its shriveled puckered corpse to a bomb with a THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS TO STUPID BALLS sign on it and dropped it on you-know-who. And btw there was more stuff too that was just the start.
LOL. Rubio be like an IQ vacuum cleaner sucking IQ points out of the brains of people listening to him.
I still think Berletic is correct: continuity of agenda.
"The ball is not at all in Russia's court…the ball has been stabbed and the deflated skin has been thrown over the lines into the public"
Yea but there was more that did not even get reported. Then a steamroller squashed the ball into a circle the size of a inflatable child wading pool. And then they lit it on fire. And then they glued the smithereens to a bomb with a THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS TO STUPID BALLS sign on it and dropped it on Kyiv. And then things got worse for the ball.
Bollocks.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/50aef64f2920bc08e60de19f6d77a0f691c48720df0a71b051cc5ff2703116a7.png
Russia has said no.
Actually just read that: “Moscow is in favor of a ceasefire in the Ukraine conflict, but questions will need to be ironed out in future talks with the US, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said”.
It may be still posturing but it’s a formal concession. Is Putin comitting his latest diplomatic blunder or there is already some sort of “secret pact” that allows for this kind of development to be choreographied?
In any case it’s not yet a ceasefire… but a statement in favor of one such thing, with many question marks attached.
No arms or intelligence for Ukraine.
No training even for the duration of the ceasefire, buffer zone…
Not clear where this is heading.
Escalation.
No lasting peace between Ukraine and Russia is possible until Ukraine obtains it's independence which was lost after the coup 2014.
Or else NATO should abandon it's anti-Russian Ukrainian project.
The third option is Russia taking under control most Ukrainian territory and forces a regime change in Kiev.
Nothing of the mentioned above is going to happen any soon.
You should abandon your anti-Ukrainian bullshit.
ICC judges issue arrest warrants against Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin and Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova.
https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-ukraine-icc-judges-issue-arrest-warrants-against-vladimir-vladimirovich-putin-and
suggested reading:
"Trump Opts For More War With Russia" (moonofalabama)
Overall, we rate Moon of Alabama Left as Biased and questionable based on the promotion of pro-Russian propaganda and conspiracy theories, the use of poor sources, false claims, and a lack of transparency.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/moon-of-alabama/
Disagree entirely. MOA has been a valuable source of alternative views to the mainstream narrative (including its vast number of commentators) for years.
"Overall, we rate Moon of Alabama Left as Biased and questionable"
"Overall," ignorant lazebags fall back on second-hand blanket dismissals cause they're too ignorant and lazy to engage w/opposing specifics.
In this update, we find that Moon of Alabama has become sympathetic toward Russia and the war in Ukraine, often citing misinformation.
For example, in this article they claim a false flag Neo-Nazis In Ukraine Fake Incidents To Gain More ‘Western’ Support – Updated. Media credibility rater Newsguard has detailed an extensive list of false and misleading claims regarding Ukraine. Generally, Moon of Alabama is a pro-Russian conspiracy website.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/moon-of-alabama/
"Moon of Alabama [is] sympathetic toward Russia and the war in Ukraine, often citing misinformation….For example…"
1/ Mediabiasfactcheck "example" does not support its claim of MOA "misinformation."
2/ Showing – again – "ignorant lazebags" like you "fall back on second-hand blanket dismissals cause they're too ignorant and lazy to engage w/opposing specifics."
Either, either or…As long as we don’t go to war!!!…
Appeasement after swallowing up the sudetenland is not really a great idea that history shows…
Try to follow the conversation
Historical comparison, but alas for those who fail to remember are doomed to repeat them. That’s another one from a really smart guy. But keep flailing blindly, its rather amazing and sad at the same time…sigh
Russia has been in appeasement mode since 1991.
They screwed up by trusting the west and its ‘not one inch east’ bs…
Russia would not agree unless US/Ukraine accept their amendment to the CF proposal…!
The next headline down says Zelensky won't agree to territorial concessions which he had already said right after being chewed out by Vance-Trump. This shows the falsity-stupidity of the Rubio set-up "deal" which will automatically fail then be used to blame them Russians, them Russians. It's more propaganda and poll-serving BS as usual.
Thanks to Albert Bakker:
The ball is not at all in Russia's court (the nonsensical talking point being drummed into our heads today) the ball has been stabbed and the deflated skin has been thrown over the lines into the public
"Russia was waiting for the details" How long does that take?
"''Russia was waiting for the details' How long does that take?"
Do you even know that US-Russia talked only today?
Do you even know Russia responded?
'Ball is in' US 'court' now.
How fucking ignorant are you?
After hitting Ukraine hard on peace talks, how far will Trump go to pressure Putin?
Trump’s push for a ceasefire in Ukraine could be a game of chicken with Putin, but the real question is whether he has the resolve to stand tough on Ukrainian sovereignty.
https://kyivindependent.com/putin-has-likely-rejected-trumps-ceasefire-proposal-what-now/
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/cd8b28434cef9a134ae0ad6032520019548074bb4245289738436c510fba5b20.jpg
Guess short version is this is actually a kind of negotiation, where the US has now has come up with an 'offer.' US: 'How 'bout a 30 day ceasefire?'
Russia 'A 30 day ceasefire? Sure – after formal and binding "pre-emptive concessions" (quote from some news source) that satisfy the core demands that led us to invade…
…including, now, territorial concessions – which, btw, Ukraine just defied the US on by publicly rejecting as part of any agreement.'
US: 'But…'pre-emptive conce-'…that's not so much a ceasefire as…a treaty.'
Russia: 'You learn fast – it is 'more a treaty.' Like we've always stipulated in our 'war aims,' the invasion stops when there's a path to meeting our demands. Your 30 day ceasefire doesn't offer such a path. Formal and binding pre-emptive concessions do offer such a path.
Dunno what US negotiators say then…
…For domestic political reasons, Trump wants credit for 'ending the war,' and would bray about even a short ceasefire as fulfilling a campaign promise. But Russia is not Ukraine or Gazans, and has no incentive or need to cave to 'ball's in your court' or 'more sanctions' or 'things'll be bad for you' type pressure.
'Becoming Trump's war,' as another poster wrote, indeed.
The stupidity is building up worse than the national debt.
Gaza is being bombed again while everyone talks about Russia.
'Developing story.'
1/ Russia has replied:
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-lays-out-demands-talks-with-us-ukraine-sources-say-2025-03-13/
2/ Yesterday on antiwar – going w/Mearsheimer's analysis – I cautiously predicted the US would leverage Moscow counter-demands to wring pre-emptive concessions from Ukraine in return for a 30-day ceasefire…
3/ …Now that's less clear…tilting me toward Bakker's 'brash incoherent non-plan' view of US action vs Maju's 'u.s. DOES know what it's doing' pov.
4/ Ball's in US court – still say situation should be clearer soon:
Publicly, will US now reverse course and vilify Russia, or declare 'progress' in an attempt to save face at a failed fantasy proposal?