Russian President Vladimir Putin has backed a proposal from President Trump to cut military spending in half as part of a potential three-way arrangement between the US, Russia, and China.
“I think it’s a good idea. The US would cut by 50%, and we would cut by 50%, and then China would join if it wanted,” Putin said in an interview on Monday.
The Russian leader said he couldn’t speak for China but said Moscow could “come to an agreement with the US, we’re not against it.” He added that it was a “good proposal, and we are ready for a discussion about this.”

On Tuesday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian was asked if China supported the proposal. He didn’t give a direct answer but said China’s “limited defense spending is completely out of the need of safeguarding national sovereignty, security and development interests, and the need of maintaining world peace.”
As things stand, the US spends significantly more on its military than Russia and China combined. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), in 2023, the US accounted for 37% of global military spending. China came in second but was still far behind, accounting for 12% of military spending, and Russia was in third at 4.5%.
When Trump floated his proposal to cut spending, he also suggested the idea of denuclearization. “There’s no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons. We already have so many you could destroy the world 50 times over or 100 times over. And here we are building new nuclear weapons, and [Russia] is building new nuclear weapons, and China is building new nuclear weapons,” he said.
While Trump seems to favor the idea of limiting military spending and reducing nuclear weapons, he is also advancing policies that will have the opposite effect. The president has backed a budget plan from House Republicans that will raise the US military budget by $100 billion and also signed an executive order to develop a massive new missile defense system, which risks starting a new arms race.
I'm sure Putin knows very well that Trump is playing a role, affecting the man-of-peace, to soften him up. Two-bit shit acting is how Putin will see it.
We will see. Trump can offer Putin sanctions relief. China can't. Trump and the neocons want to isolate China more than they want to hurt Russia. In a few months we will probably know if Putin decides to redefine Russia's relationship with China.
Are they "the necons" or a different crew?
Neocons and MAGA agree that China is the main adversary of the US.
Trump has also said not to poke the dragon in the eye.
People who want an enemy can always find one.
Russia is a natural enemy
No our elites are our enemy. Russian elites may be the enemy of Russians, but our elites are not even our prime enemy, they are are our only enemy.
russia is the enemy, pure and simple
invaders are enemies.
No enemy of mine. Besides, at current the Russians are the liberators of occupied Russian territory. Ukrainian nazi scum should get the feck out or be thrown out.
MUH NATZEES
REEEEEEEEEE
Yes, we don't need nazi's in this world. They need to be dead.
NATO has all but dissolved. All the Europeans, now unfriendly divorced from Washington, will make separate peace with Russia and probably join BRICS and happily trade in ruples. As far as Putin is concerned Washington can stick its sanctions where the sun don’t shine. The US economy is 70% financialized, has nothing Russia needs or wants, Coca Cola to Hollywood. And nothing can disrupt the Russia-China pact; both, thoroughly familiar with Washington’s dirty tricks, NGO’s, death-squads, …. The Empire is well & truly dead.
Personally, I believe Putin is a wannabe imperialist who is likely to ditch China and BRICS to get sanctions relief, an end to the war in Ukraine and to see the US effectively or actually leave NATO. But I may be wrong. In fact, I would be happy to be wrong. But we will probably both know for sure what Putin's priorities are in the next few months.
Ok, we’re poles apart. I think Putin’s a pious son of Mother Russia, and no power-crazed megalo.
In a few months we will likely both have some more data to base our opinions on.
LOL
He's so pious he has cracked down on all dissent, imprisoned all opposition figures, invaded Georgia 3 times, invaded Chechnya, invaded Dagestan, supported the gay purges in Chechnya under Führermeister Kadryov, and what else?
Haven’t read about the NED, Victoria Nuland, Samantha Power, Saakashvili, ….? Has Putin ever fought UkraNazis like the US in Fallujah or Mosul? Is he presently partnered with the ZioNazi genocide?
MUH NATZEES
REEEEEEEEEE
Putin is a liberal, but he loves Russia too. He hates war.
He was, but I want to credit him with intelligence enough to see in the present US the naked soul of liberalism and what it comes to. Otherwise these 3 years of blood & treasure will all have been for naught.
They probably aren’t worth the reward.
If he hates war, why did he launch an entirely optional war and why has he then continued to hang with that entirely optional war for three years?
He probably felt he needed to get it done before stepping down from power. He obviously didn’t expect such a difficult war.
Had he known how difficult it would be, he probably wouldn’t have bothered.
Did you forget to put a sarcasm alert at the end of your comment? Russia has been at war every year since Putin became president in 2000.
He, ah, “saved” Russia from breaking up. He defeated or subdued Chechnya. He didn’t have much choice unless you take the position that breaking up would have been good. And maybe it would have. I’m not against it.
But like I said, Russia has been at war every year since Putin first became president in 2000. Next to the USA, Russia has been the most warlike country in the world since 1979 when the Afghan war started.
It has sometimes been more justified than America’s, post Soviet anyway. I’m not fond of Soviet Russia’s interventions, generally, to the extent I’m familiar anyway.
Putin hates war so much he invaded Ukraine twice, Georgia, Dagestan, Chechnya,
He took the minimum in 2014, when it would have been easy to take whatever he wanted.
No we don't that is very idealistic
Unlike most Americans and their wet dreams of Russia ruling the world, we Europeans are realists.
Putin mastered two bit shit acting
Sounds good in principle but what will the MIC eat then?
sh*t…!
I truly hope you’re right but I’ll believe it when I see it only. It shall be a spectacle to behold if true.
In principal, please live in Reality, with Reich Chancellor Muskrat/Drumpf and Führer Putin
Putin said: "I think it’s a good idea. The US would cut by 50%, and we would cut by 50%, and then China would join if it wanted."
Interesting subtext implies that Russia might be ready to make a global arms deal with the USA without consulting with China first. At a time when China is investing heavily in building up its armed forces. Hmmm. . . .
Hmmm.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3fbd4ebc4c7adc444939d5a2ee7ab80882b5f8a82104ed4555794d2c283176f7.jpg
Maybe we're supposed to look at this as a brilliant negotiating tactic, vastly increasing our monsterous military budget in order to negotiate it back down to merely ridiculous. Negotiating internationally of course. No real debate domestically.
Russia also has inflated spending above what it’s comfortable with.
Nov 18, 2018 David Swanson: Close All Bases
Remarks in Dublin, Ireland, Nov 18, 2018
https://youtu.be/K3YhOxmKDSs
Nov 13 2022 New Interactive Tool Gives Global and Close Up Views of 867 U.S. Military Bases Outside the U.S.
World BEYOND War has launched a new online tool that allows the user to view a globe pock-marked with 867 U.S. military bases in countries other than the United States, and to zoom in for a satellite view of and detailed information on each base.
https://youtu.be/ZV1OgJYqa1U
Putin does not clarify whether Russia is now increasing its military spending in response.
https://tass.com/economy/1850039 Budget allocations for national defense to be about $148.5 bln in 2025
Knowing Herr Pütler, he probably will raise it even more
Krzysztóf_w_Lódzi!: "Knowing Herr Pütler"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putler
https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/mars-in-30-days-russia-unveils-prototype-of-plasma-rocket-engine
He can probably do a lot more with the less he is given than our MIC can do with all our wealth and treasure.
I am skeptical of what they say until I see results, but why the hell are Trump and Putin, of all the people, the ones trying to sound good on the issue?
It looks Trump and Putin already agreed on economic cooperation. Putin says he doesn't mind American participation in developing rare earth minerals on Russian territory, including former Ukrainian oblasts. At the moment, the lion's share of rare earth world market is owned by China.
Even if U.S. and Russia honor a 50% cut, the total budget this year, it still represents 4 times higher than Russias military spending. and Russia hasn’t even gone full capacity. If anything U.S. should cut even more.
The Rus will never cut their military
We need a united NATO-Russia alliance against Ukraine.
90% cut.
Do you consider the different cost of living and production, GDP, inflation between Russia and the USA, as well as the currency difference between the ruble and the dollar?
https://www.investing.com/currencies/usd-rub
https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/USDRUB/
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=RU GDP Russia in Dollar
https://data.worldbank.org/country/united-states?view=chart
https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/RUS
https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/USA
https://www.worldometers.info/gdp/russia-gdp/
https://www.worldeconomics.com/GDP/Russia.aspx
https://www.ceicdata.com/en/country/russia
https://tradingeconomics.com/russia/indicators
https://tradingeconomics.com/russia/gdp
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/indicators
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp
https://www.ceicdata.com/en/country/united-states
https://www.worldeconomics.com/GDP/United%20States.aspx
You may think the Ruble doesn’t have the same value as the dollar. But the Ruble is as important to Russia as the Dollar is to U.S. the idea of comparing one currency to the other is preposterous.
Obviously you have no knowledge of economic theory or practical economics, because, for example, you do not draw a relative, percentage comparison of the military spending of the state budget plans of the two nuclear powers USA, Russia (approx. 30% Russian defense spending, plus Russia's security spending). Nor do you convert US defense and security budget items from dollars to rubles to understand inflation. The Ministry of Finance of Russia does not show annual transparency of the Russian budget.
Your posts are proving to be useless, like those of a troll.
https://cepa.org/article/russias-year-of-truth-the-runaway-military-budget/
https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2024-11-22/russias-budget-2025-war-above-all
https://ridl.io/another-year-of-crisis-for-russia-s-military-industrial-complex/
http://www.en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/76145 Meeting on economic issues
http://en.kremlin.ru/acts/news/75724 Law on the federal budget for 2025 and the 2026–2027 planning period
http://en.kremlin.ru/catalog/keywords/35/events/74544 Law specifying certain parameters of the federal budget for 2024
http://en.kremlin.ru/catalog/keywords/35/events/74497 The report on 2023 federal budget execution approved
http://en.kremlin.ru/catalog/keywords/35/events/72828 Law on federal budget for 2024 and 2025–2026 planning period
Blah blah…
I hope Putin understands that by cutting Russia's military spending so drastically he will encourage western hawks on both sides of the ocean. All NATO plans since collapse of USSR were based upon the idea that Russia is weak and vulnerable. Unilateral disarmament of Gorbachev and Yeltsin created a lot of problems for Russia.
Russians imperialist detected!
"Putin Says Trump’s Proposal To Halve Military Spending Is a ‘Good Idea’" Translation to Russian, "Follow the liar to the front door."
"Putin Says Trump’s Proposal To Halve Military Spending Is a ‘Good Idea’" Putin must have laughed his A$$ off after that interview. https://youtu.be/dYTfzfsbiUI?si=_CHgKNMHup-DtK6C
Is that Trump's brilliant plan to regime change Russia and China on the cheap?
this bullshit from Putler and Reich Chancellor Trump makes me want to scream bloody murder
I am certain by now Putin knows it's not actually a cut, rather a transfer… but he is playing along and praising Trump, and waiting for some actions…!
Any thaw in military spending, production or mobilization, whether nuclear or convential by Russia or China will be seen by the Europeans – as they are preparing their populations for war, and plan on thwarting any sort of peace in Ukraine – as sign of weakness that needs to be exploited. And the US will not waste much time debating the wisdom of revamping proxy wars against Russia again. The West is not to be trusted and cannot be reasoned with, they are irredeemable.
Why did he cancel agreements limiting nuclear weapons during his first term and increased the discretionary defense budget after his tax cuts?
Musk has not looked at all the corruption in the defense budget. Why not, that is where the real corruption is? Most likely because that is where the billionaire oligarchs' billion $$$$ corruptions flourish.
"While Trump seems to favor…limiting military spending/reducing nuclear weapons, he is also advancing policies that will [spike military spending]."
1/ This is fairly obvious – both Trump and Hegseth have said military spending 'has to' go up, and support the military-budget-boosting, taxes-on-the-rich-cutting Republican budget…
…the blueprint of which Republicans just passed in Congress.
("Republican budget blueprint to fund Trump’s agenda narrowly passes House," Guardian, and "Trump tax cuts, if made permanent, stand to benefit highest income earners, Treasury analysis" (AP, 1/10/25)
2/ At least some mainstream news clearly grasps 'cuts' is about redirecting, not cuts: "Pentagon orders budget revamp to redirect $50 billion toward Trump's defense priorities" (Reuters; this the NYT take too)
3/ So why talk about military cuts at all? Probably not one reason:
Because it fits w/the right's 'cut wasteful government' rhetoric – which in practice means cut taxes for rich and pay for it by cutting government services that help people?
To sound 'idealistic'? – 'See, warmongers actually believe in peace too'?
Because – so long as Tr. in practice supports military increases – the MIC pigs at the trough are fine with such lip service?
Healthy skepticism is always welcome.
Cut spending to enable moar military spending! Empire! Guns or butter? Of course we want guns!
Feel the power of unipolar greatness.
Or not 🙂 I hope he cuts everything. “Mere America” would be truly great again.
"hope he cuts"
say your pwayers, wabbit…
I mean I hope he cuts everything, especially the war.
Plagiarism post.
Where was it plagiarized from?
The same place abramawicz accuses me of plagiarizing my comments from.
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2025/02/26/750025
Such a prick
Wow would you look at that!
Two of the worlds's most sociopathic leaders are finally
attempting to do something to cure humanity's chronic illness!
Somebody should be afraid!
Peace is so scarey…
Don't be gullible you'll end up fooling yourself
Well, you're absolutely an expert in the field of fooling yourself, so you should know.
Lavrov announces new round of Russia-US talks
The high-level meeting will be held in Istanbul on Thursday, according to the foreign minister
Lavrov announces new round of Russia-US talks
High-level diplomats from Russia and the US are set to meet this week to discuss the operations of their respective embassies, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said.
Lavrov made the remarks on Wednesday at a press conference in Doha, Qatar, specifying that the meeting will take place in Istanbul, Türkiye, on February 27 and will focus on normalizing the work of both countries’ embassies. The outcome of the upcoming talks would determine how “quickly and effectively we can move forward,” the diplomat added.
The two sides are expected to address “systemic issues” stemming from the “previous US administration’s unlawful actions to create artificial obstacles” for the Russian embassy’s operations, according to Lavrov.
Russia and the US have a lengthy history of diplomatic tensions, including mutual expulsions of embassy staff even before the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022. A major flashpoint came in late 2016 when the administration of President Barack Obama restricted Russian diplomats’ access to residences in New York and Maryland, later seizing additional Russian properties.
Tensions escalated further under President Joe Biden, leading to operational restrictions on embassies in both countries, significantly affecting diplomatic staffing and overall embassy functions.
Since 2023, the US diplomatic mission in Russia has been headed by Ambassador Lynne Tracy. Russia’s former ambassador to the US, Anatoly Antonov, stepped down from his post in October 2024. Some Russian media outlets have since reported that the Foreign Ministry has nominated Aleksandr Darchiev, head of its North American Department, for the position. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told RIA Novosti this month that Moscow has put forward a candidate but has yet to receive Washington’s approval.
The development comes on the heels of high-level Russia-US talks in Saudi Arabia on February 18, where both nations agreed to work towards ending the Ukraine conflict and improving diplomatic and economic ties. Lavrov described the meeting in Riyadh as a first step toward rebuilding relations, stressing that Moscow and Washington need to “clean up the legacy” left by the Biden administration. Lavrov said that a swift appointment of ambassadors in Washington and Moscow would be an important step toward restoring full-scale cooperation.–RT
https://www.rt.com/news/613337-us-russia-talks-embassies/
Russians are statesmen, real diplomates who have never been confrontational to American diplomats no matter how confrontational and bullish the Americans behaved.
The Russian ambassador in DC resigned because he had been ignored by the Biden administration for years. But he never lost his continence.
In the next few weeks or months we will see if Putin is committed to a partnership with China with an alliance with the global south or if he is willing to abandon China in return for sanctions relief, a deal in Ukraine and an end to US commitment to NATO. We will know more after Putin responds to the offers Trump is about to make.
I doubt Putin would trust Trump or any Europeans, except Orban, and Russia and China are in the same boat and most of the global population is on their side. Smart and criminal neocons destroyed the NATO alliance and the EU. The smart Americans are big enough to confront any friends they may have, Canada and Mexico, that is impressive. Yes, to be friends with the US ruling elite is fatal.
https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/02/26/america-as-republic-not-as-empire-europe-sound-and-fury-after-jaw-dropping-pivots-in-us-policy/
Alastair Crooke
“Swords into plowshares” is an idiom that means to stop fighting and start living peacefully. It can also refer to the idea of converting weapons into peaceful tools. "
The deep state warmongers in Europe and the US will never allow this to happen.
Of course, the brainwashed unintelligent minions will keep marching ahead with their hatreds, bloodlust, and greed.
There are quite a few minions in Poland and the Baltic states.
Um, not gonna happen. You're about to find out who the real bosses are in DC.