On Tuesday, the Kremlin responded to a recent report from The New York Times that said US and European officials had discussed the idea of giving Ukraine nuclear weapons, calling the talk “absolutely irresponsible.”
The report cited anonymous sources and said several officials suggested the idea while they were discussing steps to deter Russia but noted arming Ukraine with nuclear weapons would be “complicated and have serious implications.”
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the idea of sending nukes to Ukraine probably came from a “fringe extremist flank” among Ukraine’s Western backers. He said the talk was “absolutely irresponsible deliberations by people, who probably have a poor understanding… of reality, and who do not feel a shred of responsibility” for potential consequences.
The Times report said that President Biden could “return nuclear weapons to Ukraine that were taken from it after the fall of the Soviet Union.” After the Cold War, Ukraine agreed to transfer Soviet nuclear weapons that were left in its territory to Russia.
Some US lawmakers responded to the report, including Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT). “If true this is treasonous. That would’ve caused WWIII if Biden sent nukes to Ukraine,” he wrote on X. “The presidency has too much power if it can unilaterally make a non-emergency decision that’s tantamount to an act of war.”
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) also responded in a post on X, writing, “This is INSANE and completely unconstitutional, possibly an act of treason. This must be stopped immediately!! Is the Biden admin trying to start a nuclear war and use it as the reason to stop the transfer of power to Trump?”
The report came amid soaring tensions following the US authorization for Ukraine to launch long-range strikes on Russian territory using US and other Western missiles. Peskov said Russia was concerned that the “outgoing administration in Washington continues to pursue… further escalation.”
Fake news of psychological, fearmongering war propaganda by the author and his reference to the Antiwar article regarding nuclear weapons.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25751654.2024.2359818 How Useful Are Nuclear Weapons in Practice? Case-Study: The War in Ukraine
https://nuclearweaponsedproj.mit.edu/weapon-effects-simulations-and-models/electromagnetic-pulse-calculator
https://www.icanw.org/ The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN)
https://hibakushastories.org/ Working together for a nuklear free world
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/mpmenu.asp The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/mp09.asp Chapter 9 – General Description of Damage Caused by the Atomic Explosions
https://www.city.hiroshima.lg.jp/site/english/158098.html The Atomic Bombing and Peace Initiatives
https://nagasakipeace.jp/en/
What part was fake :
The direct quotes ?
The links to sources he cited ?
The lack of opinions stated by DD and the focus on classic journalist "reporting who said what" ?
I fear you, members of Trump's GISS Army, and/or other postmodern information consumers, don't understand the difference between FAKE news and FALSE news.
FAKE : National Enquirer headline "Two-Headed Alien Weds Elvis Clone, Bigfoot As Best Man."
FALSE : NBC / CBS / FOX / ABC : "Russia Had No Reason To Invade Ukraine."
In any case, his referenced article from the New York Times of November 21, 2024, provides no evidence for such an infamous rumor.
(The links to sources he cited:
https://news.antiwar.com/2024/11/22/report-us-and-european-officials-discussed-giving-ukraine-nuclear-weapons/ Please compare the internet link in the article by Kyle Anzalone: 'discussed' https://archive.is/4G56L Trump’s Vow to End the War Could Leave Ukraine With Few Options
)
Apropos: FALSE : NBC / CBS / FOX / ABC : "Russia Had No Reason To Invade Ukraine."
Counter-opinion: Russia signs the Budapest Memorandum on Ukraine's nuclear weapons in 1994 and guarantees Ukraine's security.
https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=0800000280401fbb Memorandum on security assurances in connection with Ukraine’s accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
https://policymemos.hks.harvard.edu/links/ukraine-budapest-memorandum-1994
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum
https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2024-12-05/budapest-memorandum-1994-after-30-years-non-proliferation
https://mfa.gov.ua/en/news/zayava-mzs-ukrayini-z-nagodi-30-richchya-z-chasu-pidpisannya-budapeshtskogo-memorandumu
https://www.osce.org/chairpersonship/58087 Joint statement of the OSCE Troika on the 1000th day since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine
https://www.osce.org/chairpersonship/582295 Ministerial Council side-event marks 30 years of the OSCE code of conduct on Politico-Military aspects of security
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20241205-russia-fm-heads-to-malta-in-first-eu-trip-since-ukraine-invasion
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/12/5/russias-lavrov-clashes-with-us-secretary-blinken-during-security-meeting
Lavrov Storms Out Of OSCE Meet After Blasting U.S.; Blinken 'Screams Listen…' | Drama In Malta
https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/1985743/ Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's remarks and answers to media questions following the meeting of the OSCE Council of Foreign Ministers, Valletta, December 5, 2024
https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/1985783/ Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s interview to Tucker Carlson, Moscow, December 6, 2024
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_231006.htm NATO Foreign Ministers chart way forward in addressing Russian sabotage
https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions/mercosur/eu-mercosur-agreement_en
The moderation censors some of my posts, e.g., to Thomas L. Knapp, Uncle Sapien, Peace etc. in the article: https://news.antiwar.com/2024/11/19/four-us-senators-say-they-will-vote-to-block-weapons-shipments-to-israel/ and falsifies my statements.
No, Kremlin. What was irresponsible and genocidal was you promising to assure Ukraine's security if she gave you her nukes. Because after she did it you invaded her and have been raping, torturing, and murdering her people in all possible ways for the last 10 years.
Those nukes were not Ukrainian nukes. They were Soviet nukes.
Those nukes were also at the end of their operational life.
Ukraine did not have the resources to maintain or update them.
Ukraine was paid for those nukes. Part of the reason that happened is because other countries understood the high potential of the fission cores of those weapons to be sold on the black market.
As far as the rest of your comments? The murdering, raping, torture etc. you reference was being done by Ukrainian ethno nationalists for the period you cite. AFTER those same ethno nationalists made a devils bargain with the US to overthrow the elected Ukrainian government. BTW, that decision was made despite the agreement to hold early elections in 2014.
By the way, why was the agreement on early elections abrogated? Because the ethno Ukrainian political parties were not going to win in those elections and a neutrality government was going to be the result. That wasn't going to be acceptable to Victoria Nuland and her band of Russian hating psychopaths.
A united Ukraine ended in 2014. Pretending isn't going to change anything.
Promises were made and broken on both sides. Poland was not supposed to become a NATO member.
The CIA instigated coup is not working out for the US vassal Ukraine.
Mike McColl, chair, House Foreign Relations Committee: "We can't afford to lose this fight and it's vital to our national interests because if Ukraine falls, Taiwan is next and that would be World War 3."
I can't say anything sarcastic or over the top funny in response to exigent US discourse in the wild. We're probably fucked six ways from Sunday but at least we can count on collectively reincarnating to exactly this same moment in about another 75 years–assuming Earth's biosphere is not too oblate by then.
It’s a Dr. Strangelove moment for sure.
Oye vey! ;-}
These cretins have been using the same bs domino theory for decades. Remember "If Vietnam falls then it will be Thailand, then Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines etc., etc."?
They aren't even original. Just replace a few names, adjust the ethno racism a bit and off to the next war we go.
Prior to Vietnam, the mantra had been "Who lost China?"
Exactly. “Who lost….. ……. fill in the blank.”.
The "domino effect" in the Vietnam War refers to the Cold War theory that if South Vietnam fell to communism, neighboring countries like Laos, Cambodia, and Thailand would subsequently fall to communist rule as well, creating a chain reaction similar to a row of falling dominoes, justifying the U.S. military intervention to prevent this spread of communism in Southeast Asia.
Tired old rational that goes back a very long way in human history…
"Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the idea of sending nukes to Ukraine probably came from a “fringe extremist flank”"….
"Fringe extremist flank" being most of Washington DC, virtually the entire Democrat party, and the entire GOP establishment.
Yeah, that statement from Peskov brought a chuckle. Maybe he was being sarcastic.
https://sputnikglobe.com/20241127/where-they-go-victory-follows-russia-celebrates-marines-day-1121019296.html
What could go wrong with another member in the nuke club? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8a950d2e667c2c4f6b9dc041404926a62ae10f38a868d0ac53d5ca8b1a57af2b.jpg bottoms up kiddies