The US military has announced a $6 billion weapons transfer to Ukraine, including additional ammunition for the Patriot air defense platform, artillery rounds, drones, and other gear. The aid marks Washington’s largest arms package to Kiev since the conflict with Russia erupted in 2022.
The Pentagon outlined the latest military transfer on Friday, hailing the massive arms deal as a “historic” achievement. The weapons will be provided through the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI), meaning they will be purchased from arms-makers using newly authorized aid funds rather than drawn from existing US stocks.
“This is the largest security assistance package that we’ve committed to date. It will include critical interceptors for Ukraine’s Patriot and NASAMS air defense systems, more counter drone systems and support equipment, significant amounts of artillery ammunition, and air-to-ground munitions and maintenance and sustainment support,” Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters after the announcement.
The $6 billion will also pay for much-needed 155mm and 152mm artillery shells, Switchblade and Puma drones, as well as additional munitions for the US-made High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS).
Asked when the weapons might arrive, Austin had no specifics, only saying the Pentagon would move “as fast as industry can produce.” Compared to transfers sourced directly from military stockpiles, shipments under the USAI can take longer given the need to manufacture new equipment.
The move comes on the heels of a separate $1 billion aid package announced on Wednesday, which included anti-tank weapons, infantry fighting vehicles, small arms, and air defense missiles, among other equipment. Both were made possible after Congress passed a $95 billion foreign military aid bill last week, setting aside some $61 billion for Kiev and paving the way for a flurry of future transfers.
As Washington resumes the flow of arms with a focus on air defense, several NATO allies are also considering whether to step up donations, with Germany recently agreeing to supply a third Patriot battery to Ukrainian forces.
After more than two years of fighting, Kiev is increasingly unable to ward off Russian aircraft and missile strikes, leaving some of its airspace virtually undefended. During a meeting with NATO officials earlier this month, President Volodymyr Zelensky said his country would need at least seven additional Patriot systems for adequate defenses. The United States previously sent one battery, which includes multiple launchers as well as radar and control systems.
Despite intensive lobbying by Berlin, however, some countries have been more reluctant to part with their Patriots, with both Greece and Spain signaling they would not be sending the expensive system. Asked whether Stockholm would supply any earlier this week, Swedish Defense Minister Pal Jonson said he did not “exclude that possibility” but suggested no immediate plans to do so.
Will Porter is assistant news editor at the Libertarian Institute and a regular contributor at Antiwar.com. Find more of his work at Consortium News and ZeroHedge.
“unveils”. right.
Patriot air defense platform remember about 30 years ago uncle sam blew the holy sh*t out of Iraq with Patriot missiles. hilarious that uncle sam decided that Iraq’s missiles were called Scud missiles and US missiles were Patriot missiles. probably Raytheon designed and manufactured both of them.
” Raytheon designed and manufactured both of them” LOL. If Raytheon designed the Scud it would be a more effective weapon.
Patriots (US made) are air defense missiles and SCUDs (Soviet/Russia made) are surface-to-surface missiles. I think you were trying to be funny but you wound up sounding stupid. Maybe try a little harder next time.
The lack of depth of knowledge demonstrated by ‘spy on this’ is quite considerable:
The SCUD being a NATO reporting name – and has nothing to do with the Iraq war – the SCUD being a Soviet system from 1957.
i did say “probably” you dimwits.
do you really think that Raytheon doesn’t play both sides?
and i will further guess that uncle sam rather than Russia deemed them to be called “scuds”
In the case of Iraq – US did indeed supply them with weapons – that however was not Raytheon playing both sides – in the case of Ukraine – most certainly not – some parts suppliers have been selling components to the Russians but Raytheon has not sold them missiles.
It is a NATO identification name – like the US gave Japanese planes names – when the name in Russian, Japanese or Chinese is too cumbersome, unknown or too hard for our tongues then we use such names to simplify communication.
If you were not as poorly informed as you apparently are you would know this – if you were even slightly curious you could have found out already!
i already found out genius.
“The term scud comes from the NATO reporting name attached to the missile by Western intelligence agencies.”
i’m sure that you are a brilliant military historian and you realize that as far as NATO goes, whatever uncle sam says, goes.
but frankly you resort to person insults in your comments which only makes you a dick.
Better late than never I guess – happy to have helped you grow 🙂
Dare I point out that you were the one to start throwing insults about!?
Have you already forgotten?
Just to help you a bit more, saying: “The lack of depth of knowledge demonstrated by ‘spy on this’ is quite considerable:” as I did initially is not an insult as much as a valid criticism of the level of knowledge you displayed in your first comment.
Thank you’ Merica.
F the Midget nazi Putin.
He is fighting for his own existence right now 🤣👍
Peace should be the answer to the problem of war.
And who started this war?
And that means peace isn’t the answer?
We don’t need no money for ourselves. Nope. No high speed rail. No Medicare for All. No infrastructure repair. Nope. Just keep the fat cats at Raytheon, Boeing, Lockheed with good supply of cigars and women. USA! USA! USA! Just love this country, don’t you’all?
Give me a list of Republicans that will vote for all that. I’ll wait…
And that makes feeding the MIC ok?
No. But those things aren’t ever going to come about so stop using them as an alternative.
I wasn’t. There doesn’t have to be an alternative to NOT feed the MIC.
He was.
I wasn’t responding to him. You implied it has to be either or.
I was responding to him. It doesn’t have to be either/or but that isn’t going to happen. Good luck getting the military spending under control. Too many jobs in the line in congressional districts. (It’s not really about war mongering. It’s more about jobs/votes.)
But you are FOR that military spending while you were trying to blame the republicans for them not wanting to spend domestically. So, tell me, if hypothetically that $61 billion was to go towards domestic spending instead of Ukraine, would you be for that?
No. Spend to destroy Russia so they’re no longer a threat. Increase taxes on corporations and the rich and cut the US military budget to spend domestically.
Brilliant. Like $61 billion would do that. Actually, that $61 billion is in addition to the $112 billion we have already sent Ukraine and Ukraine is no closer to extracting Russia from their territory then they were at any time since the war started.
I hear there are elections coming up. So feeding the MIC might have a little self-help aspect to that. Republicans are a little short on it compared to the Democrats so they might have come to an arrangement of sorts. I have to agree with Rational Thinker here, that of course that both parties operate from the foundational principle of not only American, but all Western democracies that the people are there for them, the power elite, not the other way around. The reverse of this isn’t called democracy, it’s called chaos.
More money dumped and set on fire in the garbage can.
I wonder what will happen when you show up with a whole lot of money and desperately want to buy stuff that is scarce to get. People who sell the stuff might well be not economic geniuses themselves, but it still might occur to them rather sooner than later that it would be a pretty brilliant idea to ask more money for the same amount of stuff. And that making too much of the stuff available is probably not going to increase profits.
So expect that hungry garbage can to demand more of that sweet money pretty time soon.
Asked when the weapons might arive, there were “no specifics.” Ah, well maybe some time soon.
[Explosions] How [inaudible] soon?
Soon! I mean when we get around to it. We don’t have them yet. Ah, we just make some and then you’ll get them.
[Explosions] We need them [inaudible] now! [Explosions][Sound of collapsing wall]
Yeah, I know! We can’t pull them out of thin air. It’s not like printing money you know.. can’t you just sit tight for a while there?
[Faint sound of gargling]
Hello? .. Hello?
[Silence]
I take that as a yes. Slava Ukraini bro! Go and win us a war.
hey yall war-mongers – – –
get on the dance floor !
f*ck you Putin and f*ck you Zelensky and especially f*ck you uncle sam
check this sh*t out =
Ted Nugent has the same guitar that George Thorogood also has.
George somehow escaped being drafted into the US military. (he was too young).
Ted, on the other hand pooped in his pants for a week before his draft board and they took one whiff of him and said, “hit the road son” and he never ever served in the US military. (true story).
Did they pull back a curtain accompanied by fanfare? Fuck the weapons industrial complex.
Hold on, I’m waiting to delete this comment………………………………………………………………………………………………………..