The head of US European Command told Congress that training Ukrainian pilots on advanced American-made fighter jets was progressing slowly. One of the primary suppliers of F-16s to Ukraine, the Netherlands, said that only half of its planes are combat ready. The planned transfers have been delayed almost a year since they were announced last spring, leading some Ukrainian officials to believe that the weapons will no longer be a game changer.
On Wednesday, General Christopher Cavoli told the House Armed Force Committee that Ukrainian training was making slow progress, stressing the challenges of transitioning from Kyiv’s current fleet of Soviet aircraft to NATO fighter jets. “It’s a particularly difficult jump to go from the older Soviet-era stuff – aircraft that the Ukrainians had been flying, maintaining, and supporting. It’s tough to go from that to a modern fourth-gen aircraft like the F-16,” he explained.
Cavoli added that a shortage of Ukrainian pilots posed another major obstacle, telling the committee that Kiev had a limited number of airmen to send for training as many are needed for operations inside the country. He said the first step was for the pilots to receive introductory English language courses.
After learning some English, the airmen will enter basic pilot training. Cavoli confirmed that some Ukrainians had already reached this stage of the process. Those who graduate must show they are proficient pilots before finally training to fly the F-16.
Last year, the White House backed a NATO proposal that would see Ukrainian troops trained on F-16s in member states, with the aircraft to be transferred to Kyiv afterward. However, the program has faced a series of delays.
According to some Ukrainian officials, those delays have severely diminished any major advantages the F-16s would have given to Kiev. “Often, we just don’t get the weapons systems at the time we need them – they come when they’re no longer relevant,” a high-ranking official told POLITICO. “F-16s were needed in 2023; they won’t be right for 2024.”
In addition to delays, Ukraine will receive only a limited number of combat-capable F-16s. While the Netherlands plans to send 22 of the advanced aircraft, only 12 will be ready to fight when they arrive. The F-16s Amsterdam is preparing to transfer were previously retired, with some in need of significant repairs or refurbishment before they are airworthy.
The same is true for the F-16s that Denmark and Norway will send to Ukraine. While the numbers have not been publicly announced, both Copenhagen and Oslo will send Kiev retired aircraft, and some will be unequipped for combat.
Kyle Anzalone is the opinion editor of Antiwar.com, news editor of the Libertarian Institute, and co-host of Conflicts of Interest.
At some point the light bulb is going to go on. You are being used as fodder.
Just enough support to keep it going but never enough to win.
Of course old F-16s are not combat ready. There is a reason they were retired from service.
Maintenance man hours per flight hour will eat the lunch of anyone trying to use them in combat.
Chafing wire bundles, corrosion, fatigue, and even bacteria growing in fuel tanks is an issue.
The real question is how much is the US taxpayer funding for these old dog beater F-16s.
Russia just obliterated a huge underground natural gas storage in Ukraine, they need to stop being NATO’s toady and get to the negotiation table.
https://www.theinteldrop.org/2024/04/12/eight-daggers-flew-into-a-gas-storage-facility-in-western-ukraine/
F no.
You don’t negotiate with idiots who think Ukraine belongs to Russia.
F Putin.
All of the above issues(requisite English language training, the difficulty of retraining pilots accustomed to Soviet aircraft, maintenance) were predicted by aviation experts two years ago when the subject of supplying Ukraine with F-16s first came up.
So, the fact that it would take several years to integrate F-16s into the Ukrainian military was a given. Meanwhile, the war has proceeded at its own pace.
modern fourth-gen aircraft like the F-16
Modern? The F-16 entered production in 1976.
It has a severe drawback for fighting in that theater, it’s utterly unable to operate from forward bases. Its bottom-mounted air scoop sucks up any piece of debris on the ground into the rather delicate jet engine, and the fairly fragile landing gear requires almost blemish-free runways. Bases hosting F-16s generally have the equivalent of a ‘street sweeper’ to clean the runway between flights, the alternative is having soldiers walk arm-length apart the full length of the runway cleaning debris on a regular basis. These things are probably going to have to be based out of Poland, which brings up a whole shitload of issues.
Russian warplanes on the other hand can operate from any straight freeway of sufficient length, are far more forgiving of fuel quality, and do not require much in the way of specialized tools.
They can’t improve on the F-16 without “stealth” waste and gadgets. There is a need for a cheap, durable plane; but that wouldn’t be profitable.
Haha 😆
Yes, F-16 are old, obsolete, and wont make any difference in the war but Russia is however willing to start WW3 by attacking any NATO airfield storing those F-16.
Are they really bad or can the they ruin russia parades?
Which one is it?
Not sure why you think F-16s will start WWIII, but you seem bizarrely eager for it. You’re not part of the Voluntary Human Extinction movement are you?
You lectured everyone here on F-16s but fall short on Kremlin statements on F-16s.
Google can help your ignorance. Use it.
The Kremlin was pointing up the fact that the F-16 is specifically designed to be able to transport and deploy nuclear weapons, which would indeed start WWIII.
I volunteer Supreme Commander Biden to pilot the first flight in.