US Ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy indicated in comments to the Sydney Morning Herald that Washington might be open to a plea deal for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange that could keep him from being extradited and imprisoned in the United States for exposing US war crimes.
When asked if the US and Australia could reach a diplomatic solution on Assange, Kennedy, the daughter of President John F. Kennedy, told the paper that it was an “ongoing case” being handled by the US Justice Department. “So it’s not really a diplomatic issue, but I think that there absolutely could be a resolution,” she said.
The comments come as the Australian government of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has pressed the Biden administration on Assange. Secretary of State Antony Blinken rejected Australia’s concerns when he recently visited the country, claiming that Assange “was charged with very serious criminal conduct in the United States in connection with his alleged role in one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of our country.”
Kennedy pointed to Blinken’s comments but again hinted that a deal could be made. “But there is a way to resolve it,” she said. “You can read the [newspapers] just like I can.” When asked if the US could reach a deal to reduce charges against Assange, she said, “That’s up to the Justice Department.”
Gabriel Shipton, Assange’s brother, said Kennedy’s comments were a sign that the US was thinking about resolving the issue. “Caroline Kennedy wouldn’t be saying these things if they didn’t want a way out. The Americans want this off their plate,” he said.
Assange faces up to 175 years in prison if extradited to the US and convicted under the Espionage Act for publishing documents he received using standard journalistic practices. The Herald suggested a “David Hicks-style” plea bargain could be on the table, referring to an Australian who was held in the notorious US torture camp at Guantanamo Bay in the early 2000s.
Hicks was accused by the US of providing “material assistance to terrorists.” According to Consortium News, due to pressure from the Australian government, Hicks was released after agreeing to an Alford Plea, a type of plea in which the defendant pleads guilty but maintains that they’re innocent. Under such an arrangement with Assange, the US could downgrade the charges and take into account the four years he’s been locked up in London’s Belmarsh Prison, and Assange would serve his remaining sentence in Australia.
Don Rothwell, an international law expert with the Australian National University, told the Herald that Assange would likely have to travel to the US for such a plea. But Assange’s family and legal team believe he must avoid the US at all costs due to the harsh condition of American prisons and fears that he might take his own life. “Julian cannot go to the US under any circumstances,” Shipton said.
Bruce Afran, a US constitutional attorney, told Consortium News that there’s nothing technically prohibiting a plea being taken without Assange being in the country. “In a given instance, a plea could be taken internationally. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that. It’s not barred by any laws. If all parties consent to it, then the court has jurisdiction,” Afran said in May on CN Live!, Consortium News’ webcast.
Afran said a potential plea deal could involve Assange pleading guilty to “mishandling official information or even, in the worst case scenario, conspiracy to mishandle official information, a far lesser charge.” Such an arrangement could still set a dangerous precedent for press freedom as Consortium News noted it would criminalize the relationship between a journalist and a source.
When exactly was Assange in the United States to commit “very serious criminal conduct in the United States?”
What you have is the DOJ colonizing other countries justice systems like they have done in Britain , it`s been nothing short of a Kangaroo court , a total condemnation of British justice.
Screw the Plea Deal… Free Assange Now…!
The American ‘solution’ is that Assange pleads guilty – on that basis they’ll release him to their Australian vassals in Canberra, who will throw Julian into a maximum security jail in Australia.
In other words it’s only a solution for those who continue to benefit from this inhumane and disgusting episode – DC and London wash their hands of the ‘Julian Assange problem’, and their pathetic little chihuahua Albanese can try and spin it in Australia for political gain.
It’s just another political fix, that exploits Julian Assange.
There are no words for how cowardly and servile Canberra has become to Washington DC. PM Albanese and before him, Morrison
will do literally anything they are asked to do by the Americans. It is shameful behaviour and deeply embarassing to witness.
Not many know and more should, that this Australian government has already jailed an innocent Australian citizen on Washington DC’s.orders. Daniel Duggan is currently being
held by the Australian government in isolation without trial in a maximum security jail in Australia, based on his alleged breach of a stupid US law. It’s an absolute disgrace
what’s going on to Mr Duggan, and another low for Canberra.
As for Ambassador Caroline Kennedy, to smear her famous name by participating in this cruelty is beyond words. As is her decision to become an apparatchik for this shameful, despicable Washington DC regime.
What an appalling human being.
So I did a quick search and I don’t know all of the circumstances surrounding Duggan. I had not been aware of him before. He renounced US citizenry and was training pilots in Africa. Was he only training Chinese military or anyone?
It’s disgraceful – just beyond belief. The guy is being treated worse than Islamic extremists at Gitmo – in Australia. Shameful stuff
More here : https://citizensparty.org.au/media-releases/five-eyes-aukus-gang-scapegoating-aussie-top-gun-daniel-duggan-their-war-agenda
Thank you so much for that. I will try to stay on top of it.
Pompeo stands out for doing it to a fellow Marine, but, the cruelty of this class of neocon torturers is legendary. However the Duggan case differs critically from Assange in that he had signed on to operate, and presumably used, a powerful killing machine in the earlier criminal neocon ‘wars’.
That’s got nothing to do with Duggan’s current case, so your point is with respect meaningless.
You’re right, in that narrow sense; but, in that the context is the plight of Julian Assange, the implied comparison is invidious.
WTF…..!!!!!!! Why take such a negative view of her work. She’s not some feckless frump from nowheresville!!!!! She is somebody and her own person and nobody for any American to trifle with. furthermore, almost all of the “released to their own country prisoners ” are set free in no-time. Anything that keeps Assange from being extradited to the U.S. is positive……!!!!!!
Thank You very Much Caroline, all our hope and love too!!!!
Oh please.
Anyone who works with this despicable US ‘administration’ deserves nothing but contempt, in particular those participating in this illegal and cruel abuse of power.
If Kennedy had any integrity, she would immediately resign. Since she isn’t, she deserves everything coming her way.
I had never heard of Daniel Duggan. Maybe Assange being known worldwide might help in what happens after he’s released to Australia? At least I’m hoping that’s a possibility.
I didn’t know about him either. He was a US Marine pilot. Wikipedia says “During this time he also renounced his U.S. citizenship in order to become an Australian citizen.” But, even if he trained Chinese pilots, are we already at war with China? I didn’t hear Adam Schiff declare war on China yet. Did you? (Sarcasm)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosecution_of_Daniel_Duggan
Australia has all way`s been America`s BITCH , you will find the Australians in every war America has waged .
The statement by Ambassador Kennedy is a sign of real progress. Assange could plead guilty (or nolo contendere) to a minor charge and be transferred to Australia, where he could be sentenced to less than the time already served.
Let’s not be hung-up on Assange’s innocence; when you are caught in the jaws of the legal system, the main project is to get out of those jaws. I am cautiously optimistic that Assange will regain his freedom.
“where he could be sentenced to less than the time already served”
Better get that etched in stone.
NO. Why should Julian Assange plead guilty, when he has committed no crime?
Here’s what needs to happen – immediate release without conditions, full apologies from the US, UK governments and full compensation for the ordeal they have Julian Assange through.
Which of course won’t happen, because these politicians in DC, London (and poodle Canberra) are unprincipled, cowardly, weak scum.
BTW you’re naive that Assange will serve out his sentence in some light security jail, as well. He will go to a Supermax facility because that’s what Washington will demand.
That’s an easy position for you to take — you’re not the one facing jail time. It’s easy to be a purist when there are no consequences. If I were Assange (or his attorney), I would be trying to get out of jail, not waiting for an apology and reparations.
And you don’t know what the US will demand, any more than I do. Get off your high horse and try being realistic. Your cynicism is cheap and phony, and no help to Julian Assange the living person. You’d rather turn him into a martyr.
I respectfully disagree. When I’m “…being realistic…” I’m drinking a healthy dose of “cynicism” especially when considering our sham justice, government, democracy, etc. Epstein suiciding himself could be a good reminder.
I think that Scipio is not so much a purest but a cynic not trusting that any deal wouldn’t result in harsh punishment. And they are probably right.
Assange has already served plenty of time and the charges are bs.
Jesus Christ Super Star ll remains hung and twisting in dictatorial eddies of US shame and deceit.
Two leading presidential candidates are competing for an office they hope will keep them out of prison. Stinking bottom of the barrel America reeks of fake democracy.
Makes me disgusted by and ashamed of my country. Assange did all Americans a public service by exposing the lies and crimes of this country; he should be rewarded and honored.
Truly an embarrassing moment in U.S. history for sure. But then so was the Espionage Act and he we are.
In a fair world, W Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Nuland, Clinton and Bolton, just to name a few, would be the ones in prison for years, and Assange the one judging them
SPECTACULAR CATCH AND EXPOSE CONGRATULATIONS TO YOU FOR YOUR CLEAR THINKING.
As described by our own, Mark “The Truth” Thomason, I SEE ANOTHER “FLOATING POLITICAL BALLOON.”
Several inaccuracies by author DeCamp. One, Assange is not being charged with “publishing documents he received using standard journalistic practices.” He is being charged with conspiracy to steal classified information. He’s allowed to publish documents, but he may not steal them. Let’s remember, Assange is a professional HACKER by trade. Second, the US military detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, is not a “US torture camp.” On the contrary, Gitmo is the finest such institution on earth. ICRC physicians I worked with there in 2002, told me, “No one does [detention operations] better than the US.” Tens of thousands of unlawful combatant Islamists who want to kill us have been captured in the ONGOING Global War on Terror, only just under 800 were ever held there, and over 740 of those have been RELEASED, and NONE have been executed, beheaded, blown up, hacked to death, dragged naked and lifeless thorugh the streets, drowned or burned alive. All things our enemies have done to US and/or our allies. There is no moral comparison between Gitmo and how our enemies treat their captives. Go take a look at how al Qaeda, al Shabaab, ISIS and the Taliban treat their captives and then get back with me.
Assange, who is not a US citizen, has never been under US jurisdiction, and was not in the US at the time, is essentially accused of communicating with Chelsea Manning (who was personally under US jurisdiction, but also not in the US at the time) on the subject of whether or not he might help Manning violate US law. As it turned out, Manning didn’t need such assistance.
“Tens of thousands of people accused of being unlawful combatant Islamists, but never charged and tried for that alleged crime in the manner clearly, unambiguously, and unequivocally required by the US Constitution, instead being illegally detained at a US torture facillity …”
Fixed, no charge.
Having to compare the U.S. to those in that last sentence in order to look good shows exactly the issue. I was reading waiting for the punch line to the sarcasm and somehow I missed it. You can’t be serious here.
If the UN can tour the current detention facility and call it inadequate, what are they comparing it to? ICRC complained about us taking the candy from MREs for behavior modification! That’s it! Did you not read about how many have been released? None executed? Are you an Islamist apologist?
There’s this weird disconnect these days about the issue of proof of guilt.
Imprison first and hold a trial maybe, …, someday.
Not at all. Are you representing the Defense Department? Do you work in the Pentagon?
If so, why do you support Al Qaeda in Syria? Were you involved in the “Collateral Murder” in Iraq? Were you involved in droning American citizens in Yemen? If you were, was it fun? (Sarcasm)
“Go take a look at how al Qaeda, al Shabaab, ISIS and the Taliban treat their captives and then get back with me.”
Indeed. We got them hands down on that issue. Of course, we had to go to the other side of the world and bomb some poor country into oblivion and do a regime change to get the ball rolling in the first place. Otherwise, we’d be a part of an Islamic Caliphate after our shores were stormed by hordes of crazy Muslims if we hadn’t acted, am I right?
No. On September 11, 2001, nearly 3,000 innocent men, women children and the UNBORN, were murdered by unlawful combatant Islamists in the Global War on Terror, which started in November of 1979, when Islamists stormed the US embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan, and then murdered US Marine Corporal, Stephen Crowley, who was from my home town. Since that time, Islamists have sought to murder innocent “kafir” (non-believers, deceivers) wherever and whenever they can. We have the right to defend ourselves from this scourge by any means necessary.
I see you’re one of those history buffs that likes to ignore the parts of history that brought on those things. How many people died in Iraq between 1991 and 2001? Any innocents? Probably a tad more than the 3,000. And probably some UNBORN among them. But those are just dirt-poor brown people. They don’t count. Am I right?
No, whoever you are. Must be nice to be anonymous. No accountability. Most Muslims (“brown people” to you racists) are killed by other Muslims (Islamists), just as most blacks are killed by other blacks. But you all don’t acknowledge FACTS, do you? Every Iraqi I interacted with when I was there in 2004-2005, from Ministry of Human Rights officials to village young people, were immensely GRATEFUL for our presence and LIBERATION of their country. The insurgents were called “foreigners” by locals. We were called “friends.” That’s history you won’t read in many books or hear about on social media or in the MSM because it doesn’t fit your FAKE, PHONY, FRAUDULENT narrative.
And Muslims killing each other on the other side of the planet is a security risk to the US how? Sure, the population was GRATEFUL for their country being blown to smithereens and making it a disease-ridden cesspool. Who wouldn’t be? I recall the Kuwaiti’s treating the invading Iraqis as liberators too. See a pattern here? I’d be willing to bet that the vast majority of Iraqis that are old enough to remember the 1991 invasion and 12 years of subsequent sanctions AND the 2003 invasion and subsequent occupation would like to slit your throat along with any other American they could get their hands on. Don’t delude yourself.
The invading Iraqis were not received as liberators by Kuwaitis. I was there, I know. You are a non-entity. A fake, phony, fraudulent person. a #SnowflakeBot.
First you seem to be to dense to understand irony.
Second,. If you were in Kuwait (and Iraq?) as you claim, you were likely in a bubble similar to the 20 year con of the Afghanistan war that had people there so isolated that they believed victory was just around the corner.
Third. If you want to see a “non entity, …a fake, phony, fraudulent person…”?? Go to the nearest mirror and look.
You were there when Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1991? Really? And here I thought the US didn’t send troops until AFTER the invasion took place. And every invasion has the locals cheering on the invaders so the invaders don’t kill them. Similar to all those in Iraq and Afghanistan who took the US side to save their own asses.
Indeed. Some don’t realize that people from desert environments are world class swimmers and can swim across the ocean.
Nice! Reminds me of the last episode of True Detective, “You’re just like a pretty bird, flying around, $hitting on people’s heads.” (Sarcasm alert)
Next time duck.
Why? I enjoyed it, “Big Brother!” (Sarcasm)
Grunts duck too, apparently, at least when it comes to comprehension of the legal standard that applies to journalism, a profession which is under no obligation to keep some Ahole’s secrets.
Who released the video showing an army helicopter crew shooting journalists? Why, it was WikiLeaks! And I for one am damned proud that someone had the guts to tell us the truth about the jackals who tried to bury it.
It’s always convenient to make points like yours when your history clock starts at a convenient point. You’re over a hundred years late.
Shorter: self-serving BS arising from BS. In fact it’s BS all the way down.
You are in complete denial about the actions and guilt done by the US at Gitmo and other rendition centers. You are pointing the finger at the wrong felons
If he takes a plea, it will be a sellout against journalism.
Yes, but the poor guy deserves to be set free from the years of mental, physical and emotional torture. The people that did this to him should get the same treatment.
Cop a plea deal, and somehow admit you are guilty, because otherwise the Empire will send its iron boot heel upon your fair face.
Biden needs votes.
There are quite a few on the Progressive left that are single issue voters or have just a couple of issues they vote on.
They’ll ignore darn near anything if they get their issue met and give senile Joe their votes for Assange’s freedom.
True.
The pro-Assange votes “on the right,” probably aren’t available to him for other reasons … but any anti-Assange voters “on the left” who were available to him will presumably hold their noses no matter what he does on that particular subject. If they were going to desert him for e.g. Cornel West, they already would have.
Agreed. Your response is better than mine.
But he misses “turnout” that these gestures are trying to increase. To share that all of these voters are already in West’s camp is just a overbroad statement one makes in comment sections.
“To share that all of these voters are already in West’s camp is just a overbroad statement one makes in comment sections.”
Has anyone made any such statement in this comment section?
I find it odd that you’d think I “miss” turnout questions.
When I’m predicting election outcomes (and I’m pretty good at that), my predictions are invariably heavily based on turnout.
But the effect of any action Biden takes on Assange is unlikely to have a discernible effect on turnout. It’s important to very few people, and to even fewer people who both 1) haven’t made up their minds already and 2) might turn out or not turn out based on it.
I happen to be one of the people it’s important to, but I don’t make the mistake of believing there are a lot of people like me in the US.
You shared about those in favor of such an act as already being in West’s camp did you not? But that’s kind of typical to ignore what you just posted about.
So you sharing about West and GOPer’s not voting for Biden is not a tangent that misses turnout which this gesture is about?
You seem to be willfully missing my points throughout this just for argument’s sake but honestly I’m used to it.
Just as this is your inevitable post slightly upset at me stemming from me sharing I believed your effort from yesterday was a little light being it was a just rewrite of that link with that addition about US training to give a impression there was a reported link to it and the attack when there was not. It was an obvious addition to feed an audience and to make the rewrite a tad longer and not such a obvious rewrite.
You seem to put more effort into some of your comments in this section at times then you did with that short rewrite.
I would have been that blunt yesterday but why be mean when a gentler comment would suffice? Now? Who cares?
Your so-called ability for prediction seems to depend on constant refraining of what you share but once again I and most around here are used to that common blog practice done by some.
“You shared about those in favor of such an act as already being in West’s camp did you not?”
I did not. In fact, I did pretty much exactly the opposite. I offered him as only one example (hence the term “e.g.”) of alternatives to Biden.
I’m “in favor of such an act” but won’t be voting for West.
Who cares what your tangent was about then?
I honestly do not give a rip about your Libertarian views about turnout no matter how you want to nitpick at me to get a back and forth going.
You are just upset that I mocked that rewrite yesterday, anyway.
Besides, that you won’t vote for West is not interesting.
My views about turnout aren’t “libertarian.” They’re the hard-nosed, nuts-and-bolts, largely turnout/GOTV premises that have allowed me to publicly predict 48 of 50 states correctly in the last three presidential elections running, as well as the correct outcomes in all six of 2022’s supposedly “toss-up” Senate races.
Still flatter yourself that you’re capable of “upsetting” me about something? Geez, get a life.
Sure whatever, you got around 50% of the few toss ups correct to achieve that.
There were not that many states in play so that success rate is not much.
And yet in 2016, I publicly predicted in May, right here, that Trump would carry Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Michigan, and win the election, while people were telling me, right here, that I was nuts to think that Trump would carry any of them, and while 538 predicted as of election night that Clinton would carry all of those states except Ohio.
I don’t need your endorsement to know I’m fucking good at this shit.
And yet in 2016, I publicly predicted in May, right here, that Trump would carry Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Michigan, and win the election, while people were telling me, right here, that I was nuts to think that Trump would carry any of them, and while 538 predicted as of election night that Clinton would carry all of those states except Ohio.
I don’t need your endorsement to know I’m fucking good at this shit.
Who gives a ef?
If you were actually good you would not be here trying to impress a stranger while you moderate a blog.
You might also put some more effort into your scribbling instead of this attempt at self actualization you are attempting with me.
Yesterday was not your best effort.
Hate to break it to you, but you’re not really important enough to me for me to be worried about whether or not I “impress” you.
Then why do you persist in these inane replies to me boasting about your past?
Who cares that you guessed correctly about 50% of states in play last time. You bragged about abilities similar to a coin flip to a stranger .
All the time you devoted to this might have better served you if you used that effort in that obvious rewrite.
That was a joke.
Short, no real facts other than what was in that sparce article you linked to.
The sharing about US training was used to intimate the US was behind it was a laughible addition, but there is no one reputable at real journalist endeavors with their own sources in that area do not share that, but here’s the blog writer (you) adding that to feed his audience and get seal claps from them.
Put some effort into your actual paid (?) scribblings (do you even get paid for most of your scribblings or is it just mostly free stuff you managed to get published?) instead of this journey of self actulization you keep trying to engage in through me.
If you were such a great political prognosticator you would not be blog mod but be a real paid writer (making a decent upper middle class living) writing about politics.
“Who cares that you correctly predicted 100% of states in play last time. ”
Fixed, no charge.
“Then why do you persist”
For one thing, whenever I notice you lying about something I said, I prefer to correct it so that it won’t be mistaken for fact.
Sure…
You tried to impress me and I called you out on it and now you are simply dancing away trying to claim other motives.
I notice you refuse to engage on that hack piece.
Now that is comical.
Do you have any factual basis to hint at US involvement? Has the perpetrators been ID’d perhaps?
Nary a word anywhere other than this blog… that was a rewrite of another’s work that did not mention it.
“I notice you refuse to engage on that hack piece.”
You’ve mentioned something you call a “hack piece” a couple of times, but I have no idea what you’re referring to.
Lol 😆 🤣
Do not even try after ignoring the taunts after 2 days.
Do you even have evidence about your silly try at including US training to hint at a connection?
Nothing about that in your link was there?
Two distinct factions are upset at them plus a huge amphetamine faction making and dealing on that semi no man’s land border. It is almost a Chicago gangster situation but with crank there with police raids and army ones as well. Then there’s the splinters and the wannabes.
But you thought a hint at US involvement without other possibilities (how about the Saudi backed folks? Religion?) would feed the audience did you not?
But what does one expect from you? Research or a feeble rewrite of that link?
Which part of “I have no idea what piece you’re talking about” did you not understand the first time?
How many pieces have written for this place? Have you convinced them to mercy print more than one this week of your free-to-this-place efforts?
Your feined ignorance is cute but is nonresponsive to my questions.
Your comical strategies at evasion is one of the many reasons why I do not take you seriously and respond to you this way with mockery.
I’m not responsive to your questions because I still don’t know what the hell you’re talking about. That may be my fault (I’m sick with, of all things, COVID today).
Mockery would be fun! You should work on yours so that others can tell it’s what you’re doing, though.
You are so full of it but then you are just the low paid mod on a blog currently begging for your minimum wage salary and server money.
The games you play gives you the status you deserve.
It is about turnout. Biden’s turnout is becoming a huge issue for him given his obvious medical issues that prevent him from speaking publically to “rally” turnout.
He will get a few out that would not have with this. He has other issues that will get a few more out with each one.
This is the ugly side of politics and he’ll make “gestures” from now until we vote.
It will not matter. The left and the progressives will sit out any election protesting the status quo.Enough is too much
You would hope so but that’s hoping people would stick to their publically stated views from over the years about war and the justice system and are too ashamed to vote Democratic anymore and will sit it out because Biden and his party are a bunch of facsists who love the war and use the justice system to go after enemies but not those who break laws that hurt people and property.
They only care that the trains run on time and people obey the State.
The Democrats (not the left) hate Assange because they blame him for Hillary’s loss. Biden promises are hollow.
Yes, I put “the left” in scare quotes for a reason. The actual left in the US is tiny and powerless.
But Democrats who hate Assange but are planning to vote for Biden will still vote for Biden even if he pardons Assange (which, I agree, shouldn’t be necessary since Assange is innocent). If they were going to abandon him, they already would have. Just like Republicans who were planning to vote for Trump yesterday afternoon aren’t going to change their minds because of last night’s new indictments.
Okay, thanks for clarifying. I mistook your quote as Democrats inspired to vote for him by promising to pardon Assange. Apologies.
Nothing to apologize for!
The left in the U.S. isn’t tiny, it’s just not organized (or visible on a mainstream platform) and that’s likely by subterfuge and design.
I disagree. I think it’s smaller than tiny. People call middle of the road democrats and republicans “centrists”. So, we have the right (D), the further right (R) and the middle (C) of the two. There are just not enough people left (no pun intended).
There is another reason to put “the left” in square quotes. Pretty soon after the “Communist Manifesto” had been published several variants of “the left” began to emerge. However, by 1900, the two major variants in Western Europe were the Communist and the Social Democratic lefts. In Russia Mensheviks and Bolsheviks.
But there have also always been small splinter groups such as the USPD (Unabhaengige Sozialistische Partei Deutschlands) and the Spartakists. My grandfather switched from the SPD to the USPD during WW1.
In Great Britain, the left has always been strongly anchored in the Union Movement.
PS. In all “lefts” there has always been a split between pro-war and anti-war.
“The left” was around for decades before right-deviationist Karl Marx put out his manifesto.
I doubt many of them are thinking about Assange. BUT, if I were wrong, the majority might agree with prosecuting him. You’re talking about people with major holes in their heads for frequent brainwashing. (Sarcasm)
Yes, the majority of Biden voters might agree with prosecuting Assange.
But if Biden pardons Assange, that majority won’t abandon Biden over it. If they’re still with Biden after his 50 years in public life, his two terms as VP, and a term as president, there aren’t very many single issues that are likely to move them away from him, and this isn’t one of the possible such issues.
Absolutely 😁! He told them all about his inner disturbing thoughts repeatedly. My favorite is when he shared that he had offered to politically “prostitute” himself.(Sarcasm)
Especially if he runs against Trump.
There’s something magnetic about senescence it seems…. Or is it just plain old dementia?
If Biden runs and wins the Empire will collapse more quickly due to incompetance and mismanagement.it is hard to imagine a greater disaster for America with the exception of Trump,DeSantis or Cruz
How about five or six consecutive life sentences for the political hierarchy which has once again promoted another proxy war in lieu of spending on the looming catastrophes which will engulf the less well off (you know, the mud people throughout the world, otherwise referred to as the middle and lower classes), who will be facing mass migration and chaos on their own in the coming decades.
My disgust with the current royalty infesting Mother Earth grows by the day.
OG; Unfortunately for mankind the infestation is growing exponentially with no relief in sight given the current state of politics and world affairs.
She really said that? It is highly unlikely that a Kennedy would be held in Guantanamo, but her rational idea has no place in the US loony bin
A plea deal will require Assange to plead guilty for some thing he hasn`t done , other than exposing Americas NATO`s WAR CRIMES .
Mostly in America does the whistle blowing and telling the truth about the malfeasance of government operatives will be considered a crime. What does that say about a free{sic} society and the publics right to, know?