The Russian Foreign Ministry said Tuesday that Ukrainian drone attacks on Moscow and other areas inside Russia would not be possible without support from the US and NATO.
The comments came after the Russian military said it downed five drones that attacked Moscow on Tuesday morning. No casualties were reported in the attack.
“These attacks would not be possible without the help provided to the Kyiv regime by the US and its NATO allies,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said. The ministry added that the US and NATO were “training drone operators and providing the necessary intelligence to commit such crimes.”
It’s not clear if the US and NATO are enabling drone attacks inside Russia, but there are signs the Western powers are involved in some way. Following drone attacks on Russian airbases in December 2022, an Asia Times report cited military sources in NATO countries who said the drones used US satellite GPS data to hit their targets.
US military equipment has also been used in attacks on Russian territory despite Ukrainian assurances. A cross-border attack in Russia’s Belgorod region was launched on May 22 using US armored vehicles and NATO rifles. One of the groups involved in the attack armed with US weapons, the Russian Volunteer Corps, includes members who are open neo-Nazis and white nationalists.
The New York Times reported last month that the Biden administration is no longer concerned about Ukrainian attacks inside Russia escalating the war. The administration previously worried that such operations could lead to a Russian attack on NATO. But if Russia perceives that the US and NATO are enabling these attacks, the risk of escalation is very high.
“Russia Says Ukrainian Drone Attacks on Moscow ‘Not Possible’ Without US Support”
The Second Coming
By William Butler Yeats
Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
Of course it is organized by US and it is not the first time. So far Putin never retaliated properly.
Putin has retaliated properly. The West has nothing to lose; it’s a dying empire considering neocon-ism its last chance. OTOH Russia has a bright future, … if it can survive this ordeal. The relative strategies, US-expand & escalate/Russia-constrain battlefield, are the logical postures.
Brandon, Congress, and DC bureaucrats are so corrupt Americans are rooting for Putin!
Tankies are routing for Putin. Regular Americans are not.
Please refer to the president as Dark Brandon
Putin never acts nasty toward NATO as NATO acts toward Russia. Probably he is hoping new reasonable politicians will eventually replace the current ones. So he doesn’t want spoil the relations too much. I think, he is too optimistic. The same story with Ukrainian leadership. Putin recognized the legitimacy of Poroshenko, hoping the situation in Ukraine could after some time come back to normal. Obviously it was a mistake. The last 9 years the situation in Ukraine deteriorated progressively every year. The same in all The West.
Right, he acts on advice, never impulse. Simply put, he’d like to have a world to live in after the US becomes “Argentina”.
right then. in for a penny, in for a pound
If the Biden administration is no longer concerned about how attacks inside Russian territory may escalate the war, then I believe the West is truly sleepwalking into World War 3.
The national Hero of Ukraine is Stepan Bandera. Go look up who he is, a Nazi and WW2 criminal. This is why the ethnic Russians call the NATO armed and trained AFU Banderites.
In a repeat of the horrendous atrocities of the Nazi’s in WW2 todays Western heroes of Ukraine have attempted to ethnicly cleanse the Donbass for Obama. Obama needed 6 million Subhumans (this is what NATO and the Banderites refer to Russians as) in the Donbass to be removed from democratic voting to ensure that his rabidly racist, anti Russian, proxy US rump Rada could stay in power.
This is where the 5 billion that Victoria Nuland pumped into Ukraine went to, to support democracy and freedom. It started a civil war and lead to the death and displacement of millions.
Obama is one nasty evil individual, who among many others, must stand trial for his many many crimes against humanity.
Yes please obama, George W, and the NEOCONS should all be tried and hung.
Too bad John McCain is already dead because he needs to be tried also.
Hanged.
The same thing should happen to Trump for his drone strike against Iran and continuation of sanctions against his enemies in S America and the ME.
You are obviously a deranged Trump hater and lower in IQ. Hatred of obama, Joey Biden and George W does not make someone a supporter of President Trump. I could care less about him!
I hate Trump in addition to Biden, W, McCain and Obama. I hate them for the same reasons you hate them. They are all war criminal trouble makers.
You say I have a low IQ but you like Trump for having a low IQ.
I agree with Trump on being against the war in Ukraine and his talks with North Korea but disagree with him on many other things. He is the closest to Israel of any president and I wouldn’t be surprised if Israel rigged the 2016 election in his favor. He supports Israeli Settlers that force Palestinians out of their homes to make room for them, he rigged Brazil’s election in Bolsonaro’s favor and they wrecked the environment together.
Worse, since circa 1944 Ukraine has been the CIA’s playground. When we re-elect President Trump, after disbanding the FBI, he must disband the CIA.
Trump did not veto giving lethal military equipment to Ukraine. He just tried to leverage it to get dirt on Biden. He did as he was told to do. What makes you think that cat is going to change his stripes?
I’m not a Trump fan. But if he says he’s going to do something, he usually does.
Really? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
And some times what he does is bad, like pushing the warp speed Covid vaccines and giving $Billions to Big Pharma. or turning the distribution of PPP and Covid Stimulus checks to BlackRock.
But wait Mary, it would have taken 5 to 12 years to get that vaccine out if anyone else had been president. Just ask the Don. It wasn’t the “warp speed” those billions made it into the pockets of big pharma, it was the Don being president that made that happen. Again, just ask the Don.
No, he didn’t. He sent Javelin anti-tank rockets to Ukraine. He didn’t veto anything, and, he increased drone attacks over what Obama did. Not only did he withdraw the U.S. from the JCPOA with Iran, he withdrew the U.S. from the INF treaty with Russia. For good measure on November 22, 2020, he withdrew the U.S. from the Open Skies Treaty with Russia. Mr. Trump also wanted the CIA to abduct Julian Assange and kill him.
Hahaha. Trump couldn’t win in 2020! He’s not gonna recover for 2024. But you keep praying to you orange god, my clueless friend!
You’re about as rational as Biden or better yet you’re rational like a crack head trying to convince the cops that the crack pipe they found in his pants doesn’t belong to him but was put there by someone else.
Sure. Not like you Kool-aid drinkers who still worship a grifter. Send him more money so he can defend himself. Hahaha. Stooge!
If he does disband the FBI and CIA, we should thank him profusely. We’ll just have to do it. posthumously. But don’t hold your breath. Trump wants revenge. Depends where the FBI and CIA fall on his list. The Bidens will be at the top.
If he gets elected, he’ll do what he always does — back-pedal, appoint some WONDERFUL swamp creature to head the agencies, brag about how MARVELOUS they are now that he’s FIXED them, then throw a shit-fit and deny responsibility later after the swamp creature does the usual swamp creature stuff.
Not quite a sure thing. But a pretty solid bet that’s exactly what would happen.
Possibly, but I would think there’s a lot of payback he wants to inflict on others and hopefully he learns from his first term just how many snakes there are in the pit of D.C. Unfortunately, you may be right, if he hires the same swamp creatures, nothing changes.
Schumer nailed it with that “six ways to Sunday that the intel community has to get back at you” He had to back-pedal on some things or the RINO warmongers (tools) in the Senate would have convicted him of those dumb ass impeachment proceedings.
What did he back-pedal from? Hiring good people? That happened long before he got impeached.
Some of them yes. He had to back-pedal from his statement in debate of: “Wouldn’t it be better to get along with Russia?”
Schumer nailed it with that “six ways to Sunday that the intel community has to get back at you” He had to back-pedal on some things or the RINO warmongers (tools) in the Senate would have convicted him of those dumb ass impeachment proceedings.
Mr. “Hope and Change”. The man who had the big banks bailed out, leaving millions of homeowners high and dry. The man who didn’t codify Roe. The man with the Tuesday “kill list”, and was proud enough of it to brag, “I’m good at killing”, even killing American citizens with extrajudicial assassinations. The man who presented the uninsured with Romneycare, when he had the White House, both houses of Congress. The cherry on top of this is the Libya episode, that turned one of the most prosperous nations in Africa into a h*ll hole. “Hope and Change”, indeed.
“Oh no, nazis!”
It’s funny how the few leftists supporting Russia in this war, mainly because of Soviet nostalgia and thinking “the West is capitalist and racist!”, keep endlessly talking about the Ukrainians being “nazis”. In comments to YouTube videos you cheer about “more nazi Ukrainians dying!” when conscripts are killed.
So Zelensky, Jewish, is a “nazi”. And his campaign financier Kolomoisky. So is Biden, with Jewish grandchildren, and I guess the Black Kamala Harris, with a Jewish husband. And Victoria Nuland, the architect behind the 2014 coup, and Antony Blinken, and close Biden ally and financier Larry Fink who gets Ukraine contracts, and Biden financier and channeler of money from Ukrainian aid Sam Bankman-Fried, and top Democrat donor George Soros, I guess.
And the ADL, who support Ukraine. And neocon supporters like Bill Kristol.
Yes, definitely, keep talking about “nazis”, totally believable. Doesn’t look like a clownish claim at all.
“But the Azov Battalion! The Azov Battalion! Look at the Azov Battalion!”
“The enemy of my enemy is my friend …..for the time being.”
BOTH parties support the war in Ukraine. BOTH have the same objective: continued dominance over the world. President Eisenhower was the last clear thinking POTUS the GOP has had.
You have a short attention span and not a big fan of history.
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2020-11-14/ty-article-magazine/.highlight/the-zionists-who-worked-with-nazis-and-were-executed-by-partisans/0000017f-deee-d3ff-a7ff-ffeef5090000
Of course the West is complicate.
We are Ukraine’s arms supplier.
Biden’s crew won’t believe in escalation until after it smacks them in the face, and then they’ll blame everyone but themselves.
As they are now blaming Ukraine for the poor results of the ill-prepared counteroffensive the West forced them to launch. Rumor has it Gen. Zaluzhnyi wasn’t wounded but absent because he opposed he counteroffensive.
Not just that… US also complicit in killing Ukrainian Civilians…!
Mr. Biden could have been a diplomat in December, 2021, perhaps recipient of the Nobel, IF, he had been a peacemaker between Russia and Ukraine. He chose not to, as he chose not to allow negotiations between the parties. Twice. Most recently an envoy from Israel began brokering an agreement between the parties, only to see it stopped by us. The envoy flat out said we stopped it.
Obama was given a Nobel Peace Prize but did nothing to get it. He continued W’s wars, ended the Iraq War only to restart it with a war in Syria, started a war in Libya, said there was genocide there and lied, said Syria used chemical weapons and lied, continued sanctions against Venezuela, Syria and Iraq and waited till his second term was almost over to establish diplomatic ties and trade with Cuba.
This shows Nobel Peace Prize organizers are bias and bunch of morons…!
Dear Chairman/President Putin: bomb the s*** out Zelenskiy’s HQ and many foreign residences!
Happy 4th of July to dictator Putin.
https://youtu.be/UtV9RPsVoTA
Celebrate, it’s a colorful reminder it will take the US 3 years to catch up to Russia’s current annual ammo production while manufacturing capacities are continuously increased, their current stockpile is 2 yrs. “Bread and circuses.”
No debate. Russia can produce million and million of troops and equipment in no time. The current SMO is testimony of it. Very true. In three days they’ll take the entire Ukraine.
The “SMO” is a legal term in Russian law limiting troop size, scope & roe of the military action; Russia has not declared war. It’s a differential one should keep in mind 🙂
The US hasn’t declared war either, but that doesn’t stop people from saying that it’s waging it.
The US has a long habit of labeling wars as “police action” or “peacekeeping” or “kinetic military action.” And critics of those things correctly point out that they’re wars.
You left out not bothering to admit US troops are engaged in combat.
The SMO is a legal term to cheat their Russian troops out of benefits, salaries, and legal rights.
Well then, we (the West, NATO, US) has been doing a lot of cheating in the past 70 years or so.
Right – and we have never Constitutionally declared war in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Grenada, Panama, and Serbia.
Where are you getting your pipedream info or is it just wishful thinking on your part?
Russia’s mobilization & training is ongoing at a rate of +/-30K a month, increasing defense manufacturing capacity’s continuous, they’ve accelerated weapon modernization and their dedicated drone factory is due online next year. Idk, but that doesn’t seem the war footing of static escalation management, nor Putin a short-term thinker.
Before the war they had 1.5 million troops equipped with the most advanced weapons and unlimited supplies. You are telling me they have more? Oh shoot. This time, they’ll take kyiv in 3 hours. No, seriously.
Russia marched on Kiev, a city of 3M, w/less than 100K troops, “taking” Kyiv was militarily impossible. impossibility, not that the western narrative found it helpful to explain that little detail or that Russia accomplished what it intended: they got the Ukrainians to the negotiating table and a signed peace draft. Until Boris Johnson flew in and told Zelensky, no they wanted to weaken Russia. We have that from Israel’s former PM. So technically all 250 -300 dead Ukrainians lay at the feet of the West.
Several months ago an envoy from Israel began brokering a peace agreement. We stopped that as well. The envoy flat out blamed the U.S.
Lavrov rejected the peace draft the day before Johnson arrived in Ukraine.
Not according to reporting at the time.
Yes, according to the reporting at the time. Here’s Lavrov on April 7. Johnson arrived on April 9.
Maybe an aging memory, that’s clearly an elderly Magnum PI. Lavrov did not “reject the peace draft,” in fact he said “… the Russian delegation will continue with the negotiation process.”
He rejected it and said negotiations would continue. But that he rejected it is a fact, if you believe him. Do you believe him?
I “reject” your word choice. Lavrov is far more meticulous with his; he objected to specific changes Kiev made to the previously agreed-to draft, not the draft in total or continuing negotiations. It was Johnson, for the US/NATO, who ended negotiations. Do you disbelieve that?
Feel free to reject fact and reality all you like. They’ll remain fact and reality.
And so is what Johnson said.
Indeed, they would remain facts and reality if Your Spin were such, alas it is not. You linked an article to substantiate your claim: “Lavrov rejected the peace draft the day before Johnson arrived in Ukraine.” The article didn’t report Lavrov “rejected” the peace deal, nor any connotation of such, it reported what I wrote above less Johnson’s actions. In also quoted a Ukraine’s negotiators statement “Lavrov is not directly related to the negotiation process.” With which one could logically and reasonably argue he had no direct authority to “reject” the peace deal thereby further rebutting your claim were one of need or so inclined.
Facts and reality remain what they are: Lavrov had no part in the US/NATO via Boris Johnson ending Peace Negotiations having an agreed-to Draft Deal requiring continuing negotiations in early April 2022.
And then why did Boris tell Volod that the West wasn’t prepared to negotiate with Putin? And why did he even bother going? Two days passed in between when Larvov said what he said and Boris said what he said. Makes little sense. I also recall an article here that said Putin was showing copies of the tentative agreement at a press conference I believe.
“Makes little sense”
That’s how it goes when both sides of an argument lie all the time, about everything, 24/7/365, and insist that any agreement that doesn’t give them everything they want at no cost to themselves is unacceptable.
And that’s how it’s going to continue to go until both sides get tired enough to make concessions, or one side completely collapses.
But it was a perfect opportunity for the West to use as proof that Russia didn’t want peace. Why didn’t they use it? They wouldn’t even have had to lie. And was it a lie about Johnson saying the West wasn’t ready to negotiate with Putin? And why say that if Putin had already rejected the deal?
Well, they’re all lying all the time, so I can’t say it WASN’T a lie.
But regardless of Russia’s position, “the West’s” position is uniformly “be tough on Russia and disagree with anything its representatives say.” So I don’t see why Boris WOULDN’T pretend that it was he, rather than Lavrov, who decided there wasn’t a deal, even though Lavrov was saying it was Russia.
In this case, that makes little sense. A propaganda bonanza right there for the taking and they didn’t use it? I just can’t see that happening.
The link you provided reinforces a point that Rightstermeister mentioned in this thread: that the draft agreement Ukraine presented was not the agreement they had negotiated. I’m inclined to believe this because I saw a video last week in which Putin held up what he said was Russia’s copy of the original agreement to show that Ukraine’s negotiator had initialed it.
https://tass.com/politics/1634479
Do you think Putin would not have felt free to make changes to the Russian side of whatever draft his negotiators brought to him? Negotiators negotiate — they don’t get to make the final decisions. In business, union negotiators bring what they’ve hammered out to the union members for a vote, and company negotiators take what they’ve hammered out to the CEO, and then changes are made and the negotiators negotiate some more.
But it’s an indisputable fact, if we believe Lavrov, that as of the time Johnson arrived in Kyiv, the Russians had already rejected the most recent Ukrainian proposal.
He said. She said.
The Turks presumably could clear it up. But if an agreement 𝑤𝑎𝑠 reached, it doesn’t seem right to blame Russia for refusing to sign a subsequent altered agreement.
An agreement isn’t “reached” until it’s approved at the executive level. Negotiators hammering out a draft is just a proposal both sides are willing to take back to their bosses.
I don’t “blame Russia” for rejecting a draft for any reason — including, but not limited to, the other side departing from what the Russian negotiators thought they had buy-in for. Nor would I “blame Ukraine” for doing the same thing.
If the war ends with any kind of agreement (instead of just a frozen conflict at some point where the Russians declare a unilateral ceasefire from secured positions that Ukraine can’t plausibly break), it will happen at a point where both sides are exhausted enough to consider making concessions.
Aren’t “drafts” just initial working papers that get negotiated into formal agreements?
Those always are rejected if one thinks about it.
Sometimes these stories read as if the writer has a deadline and needs to write something, anything, even it is a obvious conclusion about a topic.
Ukraine’s draft was different than what they had previously agreed to. Boris must have telephoned in advance and told them to do that?
“Lavrov said on Thursday that Ukraine had presented a draft agreement on Wednesday that deviated from proposals both sides’ negotiators had agreed on.”
you can’t just change your photo to look like Magnum P.I.
you will confuse everybody.
Magnum PI does not look like the love child of Jed Clampett and Salvador Dali!
Bully you say
Putin never intended to do any such thing. Do you read? If so, you would find plenty examples of what he has said about the incursion, the limitations. Number one, his intention was to protect the Russian speaking Ukraine citizens (immediately after the coup in 2014, the Russian language was banned, along with other languages) who had been shelled by Kiev for 8 years, at a loss of 14,000 citizens in the Donbas provinces. Number two, his intention was to protect Crimea.
You again repeating BS with the 14,000 killed.
Here’s this link again. Igor Girkin supported by Putin started the war in Donbas in 2014.
https://youtu.be/EgjH_voWIG0
To de-nazify and de-militarize a country one must occupy the entire territory. Do you read? Don’t defend Putin, he is the one who invaded under failed intelligence.
And protect who? GTFOH with that BS. Putin doesn’t care about anyone, he just wants the natural gas, oil, and grain rich land of Western Ukraine to establish a regional monopoly. Plus the corridor into Crimea.
hooray there is your foolish video again that you warned us ahead of time that you would post repeatedly. and SURPRISE! there it is.
And yet, they’re still losing. Hmmm…
Is your name meant to be satire or is it just an oxymoron?
Ah, yes. The ad hominem attack. (Usually relied upon by the weak-minded or immature. Let me guess with you: both?)
You don’t understand the term (unsurprisingly). An ad hominem attack is one that purports to reject or invalidate an argument because of the identity of its proponent, author, etc. That’s not what #EndNATO was doing in the response to your silly claim.
Quite clearly, #EndNATO believes your claim to be obvious nonsense and is mocking you for making it. That’s not an ad hominem, it’s just good old-fashioned mockery.
As Carl Sagan famously reminded us, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. A claim at this point that Russia is losing the fight in Ukraine is definitely extraordinary, as even recent reporting by mainstream Western media makes clear. If you make the claim without extraordinary evidence, as you did, you shouldn’t be surprised if you are mocked.
He asked you a question? Reading comprehension not your strongest suit?
Yet you make your claim without evidence as well. You have no source outside of Russia that will support your claims. Ukraine IS advancing according to many sources (Western Media, Independent Media, and RUSSIAN mil-bloggers Rybar and War Gonzo.)
You can follow their Twitter accounts. (There’s even translation available!)
You are in denial and any evidence I post will not change your need for comfort.
Do you have anything to add to the discussion or are you just gonna s**t out of your mouth?
There was a time, last autumn, when it might have been rational to assess that Russia was losing. It would have been short-sighted and ultimately simply wrong, but it wouldn’t have been irrational.
To reach that conclusion in the face of the obvious reality of the war today is beyond irrational. It’s bizarre.
Russian forces occupy about 23% of what was once territory within the internationally-recognized borders of Ukraine and unless something changes very radically, they are likely to continue to do so. After a month of the much-touted Ukrainian counteroffensive, Ukraine’s forces haven’t even made it through the opposition’s security zone to the first of three prepared lines of defense. Absolutely nothing that is happening now indicates that the situation is about to change.
Hmmm . . . indeed.
Russian mil-bloggers have already admitted to a slow and steady Ukrainian advance. (Your Russia media sources probably haven’t told you that.) The Ukes have no real air dominance so they have to move ahead slowly. I’m sure your advanced experience in combined arms warfare can’t allow you to see what is happening though.
You need to seek the site, Moon of Alabama for on the ground assessments.
Moon Of Alabama
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi2zpPLqvj_AhWJMUQIHXv1C9MQFnoECBEQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.moonofalabama.org%2F&usg=AOvVaw0yrPLqTwY33rRT53S-VuKA&opi=89978449
you forgot to call him a “tankie”
Uh, oh! Seems things aren’t going stellar for the Ruskies!
https://twitter.com/NOELreports/status/1675754671925866496?s=20
Our “western analysts” have told us that, as well independent and global south media depicts the same. As I believe your corporate media has told you that their month long “slow and steady advance” has not made it out of the security “grey zone.” Meaning they have yet to reach Russia’s 1st defense line, much less breach it – and there are 3-5 defense lines.
You’re wrong. The Ukrainians don’t have “real air dominance,” they have none; consequently their “move ahead slowly” continues the slaughter and quite likely why Ukraine’s military command opposed this politically-driven counteroffensive the west forced upon them. It doesn’t take combined arms warfare experience to read a control map or run the most conservative western death ratios to “see what is happening.”
^This^
i’m sure that Russia is indeed losing, , , their patience
Yes. I’m sure they’re ready to start winning aaaaaaaaaany minute now.
I don’t think you have any idea how things are going on the battlefield. Lieutenant General Valerii Zaluzhnyi, commander of AFU forces, provides a far more accurate assessment.
https://www.businessinsider.com/ukraine-needs-more-weapons-counteroffensive-top-general-zaluzhny-2023-6
It is my belief that Russia believed that there would be no clear thinking on the part of the U.S., and there would be no acceptance for Russia to join the Western Alliance as it wished to be 31 years ago. So, with each country being gathered up for one thing and one thing only, which was the encirclement of Russia, I do believe Russia began preparing for the inevitable year ago. I do not believe that there was a made rush to begin production of war materials, but it has been going on for years, stockpiling conventional weapons.
Yes, Putin’s 2007 Munich speech was a turning point. A quite amazing speech, misunderstood by the west then as well as now, an explicit warning of NATO’s security threat and a clear vision of a future world that’s come to pass. As well a prophecy for America, the unipolar hegemon “destroys itself from within.”
BTW, happy belated 4th of July to all the US patriots here. Lol.
There’s nothing patriotic about supporting wars of choice and aggression, proxy or otherwise. Sadly, though, the US is full of ignorant, deluded and inappropriately smug citizens who just don’t get it.
Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, et al. We are currently involved in special ops in Somalia. War, war, everywhere war, just a special opportunity for the MICC. Yahoo!!! USA! USA! USA! May the MICC live long and prosper, even throughout nuclear fallout.
Right! Supporting the squandering both human and physical resources for useless, counterproductive wars of destruction and mayhem is the opposite of patriotic. Until that is recognized, the people of the USA and other nations are ensnared by the Kakistocracy.
thanks Julio, you have a good day too
Yes, we get it. Sarcasm. You sound just like another Don, but he uses all caps.
You’re not one of them, that’s for sure.
Australian news site lying as usual. The Russians definitely said Kiev, which is the actual name of the Russian-built city, and has been so for every century of its existence. “Kyiv” is the “Ukrainified” version of the name, used by the media for propaganda purposes after the 2014 coup, but the habit picked up speed mainly in recent years.
The Left’s renaming and switching of words long ago reached the point where they actually change the words and names used by someone in the past, or now, even change what someone says in the present.
freedom fries
“The Left?” 😏
Who and what do you imagine constitute “the left” in this story?
Biden is just the latest president to have turned our foreign policy over to a bunch of neocon zealots who hate Russia, hate Ukraine, and ultimately hate the USA. They never negotiate. They always operate by way of deception. At least since 2001 they’ve driven the USA into wars of aggression that have bankrupted us both financially and morally. America is their golden calf and they will suck it dry, chop it up, and sell it off piece by piece until there’s nothing left but the world’s biggest welfare state that they will create and control. May Heaven preserve us all from the wrath of the chosenites.
They are like Biden, they have no allegiance to any country only themselves and their own self interest.
Their only allegiance is to the Father of Lies.
Did you know there is a John Brennan Center (for election integrity, world peace, & climate justice and equity) in DC?
How ironic
I hear that DC will be putting up a building next to it: ” The John Bolton and Victoria Nuland Center for Peace and Diplomacy”.
Safe and secure, protected by two great bodies of water, friendly nation to the North, friendly nation to the South. That is how the Christian Fascists believe and behave. We can have bases over the world, nations made to encircle Russia, deliver nukes to those nations, and not expect likewise. If a Russian ship or sub docks at Cuba the Fascists will lose it. We are Oceania, but the citizens do not realize it. “War is Peace”. “Ignorance is Strength”. And so we are made to argue against our best interests, and among ourselves. Inverted totalitarianism.
BRICS is the bomb that will take care of (things) like this in the very near future ..
You mean BRICS+
https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/brics-20-years-on-a-success-or-failure-52410
Someday, little one!
No elections, forced gunpoint conscription, anti retreat troops, book burning, banning of free speech, looting of churches, government death hit lists, mass murder of civilians, ethnic cleansing campaigns, assassination of peace negotiators, bombing of Nuclear power stations, destruction of Europes energy infrastructure, terrorism, rape, torture, massive human rights abuses etc etc etc.
Yep this is a Western war for freedom and democracy right? Up is Down, Black is White its all just big lies after big lies.
The Nazi’s are back in Europe and this time we fight shoulder to shoulder with them, brothers in arms. History will not treat us well.
And remember when they come to recruit you with a gun to your head……….you should of stood against it now, that is the lesson of WW2, and the failure to stand against it led to the death of 6 million ethnic people.
What a fine year this is turning out be…We still have 5 months left for going for China! https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5c71220064a67a8dad8aee6668b5b1d5bfa313dfec245758bbaf411664f59df3.jpg
“and that’s why i say hey man, Nice Shot – Nice Shot Man”