The Kremlin’s top diplomat said Moscow can no longer trust Washington and the potential for nuclear war has escalated. The Russian foreign minister suggested talks with American officials were possible, but Washington has not made an effort to engage.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov’s remarks were reported in TASS on Wednesday. “Russian President Vladimir Putin has said it repeatedly that we are open for cooperation,” he said. “But, in regards to our former Western partners, we can no longer rely on agreements with them, including legally binding ones. It is a ‘fight of worlds,’ of sorts.”
He went on to indicate that talks between the two sides are unlikely. “Each time [US Secretary of State Antony] Blinken requested contact – it happened twice in the last eighteen months, I think – I either answered his phone call or we talked on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Bali for about ten minutes.” He continued, “But there were no more requests.”
Contact between the White House and the Kremlin has been through National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan rather than Secretary of State Antony Blinken.
Lavrov argued part of the issue is Western leaders have stated they will indefinitely provide military support to Ukraine. “They never answer the question – ‘it takes’ to do what? It is one thing to end the military campaign, like they ended it in Afghanistan or in Iraq,” he explained, adding, “It is, probably, a slightly different thing If they want to use this campaign to completely annihilate the Ukrainian army. That is, when they smelled trouble in Afghanistan, in Iraq, they simply high-tailed it out of there. They have no interest in Ukraine itself.”
The diplomat said Moscow has no plans to conclude the war before achieving its goals in Ukraine, and the Wagner insurrection had no major battlefield impacts. “As we overcame the attempted mutiny, we haven’t made the slightest concessions with respect to the goals of the special military operation and haven’t lost any positions on the battlefield… It’s impossible to give them up – the goals that have been set.”
Lavrov warned the deteriorating relationship between Washington and Moscow escalated the risk of nuclear war, blaming the US for withdrawing from Cold War-era agreements. “It is a medical fact that they have destroyed the entire international legal system of deterrence and strategic stability.” He added, “It’s a good thing they do not want a nuclear war, no one wants it. And the system of agreements, which has been destroyed by the United States, exists specifically to reduce its risk and to make this risk negligible at all.”
Since the end of the Cold War, Washington withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty and the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. While Moscow suspended its participation in the New Start agreement earlier this year.
This article was originally featured at the Libertarian Institute and is republished with permission.
Kyle Anzalone is the opinion editor of Antiwar.com, news editor of the Libertarian Institute, and co-host of Conflicts of Interest.
Lavrov said “Moscow has no plans to conclude the war before achieving its goals in Ukraine”
Moscow should probably reiterate to the rest of the world what their goals actually are at this point. if they say it loud and often enough then the US will not be able to pretend to not hear them.
Moscow has been very clear about what the goals of the SMO are. De-Nazification, De-Militarisation and De-Occupation of Ukraine.
How can you not know this?
Maybe he’s just assuming that Moscow is not full of complete fucking idiots and that therefore they’ve either changed those impossible goals or were lying about them from the start.
Those goals are not impossible.
Biden is on his way to losing it all, to losing NATO too, to losing to China because of that collapse, and to destruction of the Dollar and international financial system of the US.
It is a complete disaster, done by blundering fools.
Trump is also a fool. That does not change things about Biden/Blinken/Sullivan/Nuland being total disasters.
DRINK!
Or maybe they just mean what they say.
That’s not an “or maybe.” If they mean what they say, they’re complete fucking idiots.
In your opinion. The war of attrition is designed around those goals. ie the destruction of NATO.
Ukraine was defeated a year ago, Moscow is now working on defeating NATO.
of course i know what Russia said their red line in the sand was, just as we all do around here.
check out what i actually said there = if they say it loud and often enough then the US will not be able to pretend to not hear them.
They’ve been saying it clearly, repeatedly and emphatically all along. The US has no intention of admitting it hears it and is fully capable of pretending not to hear it for “as long as it takes.”
It’s quite clear that the Kremlin made what it considered a final attempt at resolving its security issues with the US and its Eurominions in the final weeks of 2021 and subsequently concluded, finally, that the Leader of the Free World™ is “not agreement capable.” It’s going to be very, very difficult to change that assessment (not least because it’s entirely accurate) and it’s not likely to change anytime soon.
Its pretty simple. All that is at stake is war or peace,life or death for humanity.
For the last 15 years, Russia has been saying it. American administrations have been listening, but refusing to hear.
yes it is “quite clear that the Kremlin made what it considered a final attempt at resolving its security issues with the US in the final weeks of 2021” – my point was/is that maybe they should keep pointing that out to the west as loudly as they can so that the US will not be able to pretend to not hear them. go back up and notice that i used the word “reiterate”
Same for April, 2022, and recently when a representative from Israel attempted to get things done. That representative flat out said that the U.S. killed the negotiations.
Which Red Line again? The West has crossed so many I’ve lost track…
And now the de-fanging of the Potemkin Village that was the Russian military!
Job creators are the consumers.
Even if Russia offered to pay for full page ads in papers and spots on radio and TV, Wash. wouldn’t let them and accuse them of ‘fake news’ and propaganda. People in America still put too much faith in the gov. as they really do believe it has their best interests at heart.
Well faith in our job creators. Not so much in our government.
I wish the US had government officials who could speak on the same level as their Russian counterparts. But the vulgarization of American culture has thoroughly erased that possibility.
Vulgarization of American culture. I like that and sums it up rather succinctly.
American culture has always been pretty vulgar, it’s just at the point of absurdity today. Cussing and foul language are even being used in media headlines and stories in the MSM.
Oh, no! Cussing AND foul language!?! Where is my fainting couch!
Just shows lack of class and decorum in the press and media.
I think we’ll survive.
The Russian swamp is about as trustworthy as our swamp creatures.
I honestly do not believe this guy anymore than I do our Blinky.
I’ve been watching Sergei Lavrov and reading/listening to translations of his statements, press conferences, etc. quite carefully since the autumn of 2013. He appears to me to be, in every way, far superior as a diplomat to anyone in a senior position in the US State Department during that period.
I don’t recall Lavrov spouting anything like the bullshit and obviously-dishonest nonsense that characterizes US diplomacy. He definitely works to communicate the messages he wants the world to hear and, as is always true of diplomats, is sometimes less than fully candid, but he’s a serious, skilled and professional adult practitioner of his craft, in contrast to the transparently scheming clowns our US government trots out unto the world stage.
Lol
It is accepted fact every person involved in high government positions are professional liars yet because of your political biases you believe those you like.
It must be a wonderful niave world you live in.
It is a fact. Witness the continued fondness of Mr. Trump’s sycophants in the face of the facts in the charges against him. I believe he could not only shoot someone on 5th Avenue, but then hack that person’s body into small bits, then sell the bits as meat at a market, and his sycophants would still follow him. He is the personification of Randall Flagg of the King novel, ‘The Stand”.
Yet Joe Biden can be on tape accepting bribes and his fanboys of the Left do not care.
Try not to reveal thinking so shallow as to amount to stupidity while attempting to glibly demonstrate your superiority.
And go look up the definition of “fact.” It doesn’t include “whatever ZaSu wants to believe.”
Lol…I know to say anything is “fact” needs to have a “it’s a pretty much a” in front of it but I knew you be so much more paticular about my veracity than that guy’s so I refrained from couching it.
You failed btw….lol.
Seems to me you just proved your political biases are at play here when you believe that guy speaking in a state run media source.
I bet you don’t believe a thing the Brits nor the US says but anything this guy shares you try you best to believe it.
None of us are omniscient, but what Lavrov says seems a lot more credible than anything coming out of the mouth of any western so-called diplomat. If you have any specific complaints about anything he has said then feel free to share them.
You do know the guy quotes George Rockwell, the founder of the American Nazi party?
You may not like me but unless you are of similar beliefs as the American Nazi party I’d avoid this clown.
Do you have any specific citations?
Darn it!
I tried to edit
Not the Russian, the new clown posting here.
Click the guy’s name and peruse his comments.
He’s no one to stick up for at this place.
I think you have Mr. “Dissident” mixed up with “John Birmingham” ? The latter was the one who quoted Rockwell. “Dissident” actually trashed him for it.
I just clicked the guy’s profile and he is quoting Rockwell, not disagreeing with him.
Perhaps it was a disagreement between like-minded posters that you stumbled across?
Look at his profile and you’ll notice a quite ugly one about gas chambers.
Welcome him for all I care but Rockwell is not making me look too favorably towards him.
Who’s Rockwell?
The founder of the American Nazi party.
Not anyone whose quotes need to spread.
It’s not my place, nor desire to “welcome” people to this forum. Just interested in being fair, rather than possibly slandering (is that too strong of a word ?) someone over a misunderstanding.
I guess you’re not familiar with the “eye roll” emoji:
“You sure know how to pick heroes for inspiration. 🙄”. After which he shows the more odious quotes from Rockwell to make his point. By the way, I couldn’t find any of those references you mentioned on his profile. Not even from the other guy, Birmingham who posted the “favorable” Rockwell quote, other than some opposing the Israeli government, which I guess might count with some people as “anti semitic”, IDK. Also, I think the moderator would probably remove any comment praising any mass murder.
I don’t care what others post except when they reply to me for the most part but when someone shows up with a new account with 28 posts among which quite a few is quoting the foundedr of the American Nazi party I do not look upon them kindly
But that’s me ….
To each their own, I’m just not going to be nice to him…sorry…lol.
I’m just sayin’, I looked at his (Dissident51) profile and comment history, and didn’t see a single reference or endorsement of any pro Nazi stuff, whatever, at all. Just where he replied to the Birmingham guy who quoted Rockwell. In which he derided the guy for quoting a nazi. Are we even talking about the same person ? I don’t mean to drag this out, sorry if I appear to. Peace !
Fine, you make freinds with the 28 comment troll.
I honestly do not care who you want to be friends with. You tell him he’s a fine fellow and I won’t.
It is possible that the US diplomats don’t know what bullshit sounds like because they never have heard anything different in our political system. The next time a politician tells the truth. They all have long noses.
It’s just now a matter of degrees and Russia is still a little higher in the truth dept. Wash. is still in whopper mode.
Not to disagree that Russia has swamp creatures too, but I just don’t think anyone can outdo our own Blinky.
Blinky, Hillary, Nikki, the are peas in a ood.
I do not like Lavrov, or Putin. However, they do seem to think of a connection to the real world as a tactical advantage. I like that.
At least they still believe in women and men. /s
So does everyone else.
But, as has been the case for millennia, they’re not always in agreement on what those terms mean.
When the axioms come into question and redefinition, it’s the end of sanity in a society. That’s especially true when people are coerced and punished for still believing the axioms. And, it hasn’t been in question for millennia. XX and XY is XY and that’s the way it’s always been. If someone wants to believe they are something other than their biological gender, it’s their right; just don’t ask me to believe it or coerce me into agreeing with someone living a lie.
“XX and XY is XY and that’s the way it’s always been.”
And there are people with XX chromosomes and penises, and people with XY chromosomes and vaginas. The XX/XY thing captures the center of the bell curve, but there are in fact outliers.
Also, that test hasn’t been around for “millennia.” It’s from the early 20th century.
Biological sex and gender identity aren’t the same thing, nor have they always been expressed in whatever ways you happen to be comfortable with. 300 years ago, if someone wore a wig, pancake makeup, petticoats and high heels, he was probably a male member of the British nobility. And a number of societies have split the two biological sexes into more than two community-recognized gender identities.
“I WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNTTTTTTTTT it to be simple, and exactly as my mommy told me when I was three” does not make it simple and exactly as your mommy told you when you were three.
Heck, to me, to “like” a political leader is akin to idolatry to me.
US, Russia in a ‘Fight of Worlds’ another name for that would be WW3.
No elections, forced gunpoint conscription, anti retreat troops, book burning, banning of free speech, looting of churches, government death hit lists, mass murder of civilians, ethnic cleansing campaigns, assassination of peace negotiators, bombing of Nuclear power stations, destruction of Europes energy infrastructure, terrorism, rape, torture, massive human rights abuses etc etc etc.
Yep this is a Western war for freedom and democracy right? Up is Down, Black is White its all just big lies after big lies.
The Nazi’s are back in Europe and this time we fight shoulder to shoulder with them, brothers in arms. History will not treat us well.
“Nazis are back in Europe and this time we fight shoulder to shoulder with them” – that’s exactly what Churchill wanted to do in 1945. It didn’t happened in 1945 only because Roosevelt didn’t agree. In 1945, at least, they had a justification. The communist threat was real. This Anglo-Saxon war in Ukraine is pure imperialistic, anti-democratic criminal war without any reasonable justification.
Oh, no! WWIII! Nazis! Hahaha. You guys are so entertaining. Why don’t you mix up your arguments a little?
You’re mixed up – and not a little.
Are you referring to Churchill`s plan to invaded Russia with the help of former Nazi soldiers , but the US said no because they new the Red Army could not be beaten ? .
US at the time had not enough nukes. So they postponed it until 1950 or 1952. Stalin made his own nuke in 1949. That’s how Anglo-Saxons missed the train.
That’s also the reason we accepted Japan’s terms of surrender. We ran out of nukes.
Japan had no intention to surrender after Hiroshima, it took another bomb on Nagasaki to convince them. They didn’t know how many bombs America had at the time. And, don’t forget the Russian’s part in ending the war at the battle of Manchuria.
Japan had been trying to surrender for five months before Hiroshima.
Read this. https://militarytruth.org/the-bomb-didnt-stop-japan-stalin-did/
They wanted to surrender on their terms only. After all the atrocities committed by Tokyo there was no way the Allies would let that happen. https://militarytruth.org/the-bomb-didnt-stop-japan-stalin-did/
Atrocities like bombing Tokyo?
Wars are full of atrocities, in case you forgot. Tokyo bombed many cities and killed many people in China. Trying to white wash one side is just a part of the ‘either/or’ mentality infecting humanity today. Sometimes both sides are wrong, no?
Here’s another link re. that: https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/05/30/the-bomb-didnt-beat-japan-stalin-did/
They were ready to surrender after Okinawa but on some kind of reasonable terms i.e. their Sovereign and sovereignty remains. The US held out for “unconditional”. .. In the end, after the second bomb didn’t yield a surrender and no third bomb at the ready, the US caved into Japan’s ONE demand. Hands off the Emperor. And yes, the Russians were coming,
The US didn’t concede to “hands off the emperor” until well after the surrender.
I beg to differ, there was a cable sent outlining the post surrender regime with Emperor specifically included.
This was all they had to hear and capitulated, something the US could have accepted long before nuking Japan – twice.
You can differ all you like, but the explicit terms of the instrument of surrender will remain the same:
“We hereby proclaim the unconditional surrender to the Allied Powers of the Japanese Imperial General Headquarters and of all Japanese armed forces and all armed forces under the Japanese control wherever situated. … The authority of the Emperor and the Japanese Government to rule the state shall be subject to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers who will take such steps as he deems proper to effectuate these terms of surrender.”
After the war, McArthur CHOSE not to exercise his clear and unambiguous authority to remove the emperor if he deemed it wise, based on the recommendation of Bonner Fellers.
The “explicit terms of surrender” wouldn’t mean jack unless the Japanese actually surrendered. The only way they were going to do that was to acknowledge the Emperor which the US did in the cable as well as the instruments of surrender. Calling it “unconditional” doesn’t make it so, just a face saving lie for public consumption.
The Japanese started trying to surrender in March of 1945, their only condition being that the emperor not be removed. The US insisted on, and got, unconditional surrender — and only then wisely made the decision not to remove him.
The insisted right up to the point that they caved in and sent the cable…
America capitulates. Japanese honor triumphs.
Japan wanted to surrender on their own terms. Read this: https://militarytruth.org/the-bomb-didnt-stop-japan-stalin-did/
US used nukes to scare Stalin. Otherwise, the bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki had no sense. Russian army, as was agreed, started the war against Japan 3 months after the capitulation of Germany. Americans knew that Russia is going to start the invasion into Manchuria on August 8, so they bombed Hiroshima on August 6. The point was to discourage Stalin from supporting China. It didn’t work. Stalin helped Mao to win the war against pro-American Chiang Kai Shek.
Stalin, then Khrushchev offered nuclear disarmament to the American administration. We turned it down on both occasions.
Stalin wasn’t trustworthy. The Soviet Union was still bent on the spread of communism around the world.
The Soviets asked to join NATO
Stalin wasn’t the most truthful leader in the world at that time. Plus, he was anti-capitalist which says everything as to why he couldn’t join.
Here’s why Stalin couldn’t be trusted. https://www.businessinsider.com/new-research-reveals-misconceptions-about-joseph-stalin-and-his-great-purge-2016-7?op=1
When Stalin became the head of the state, he proclaimed that the socialist and capitalist countries can coexist in peace. Lenin and Trotsky always talked about the world socialist revolution. The same as Anglo-Saxons now, they wanted to rule the whole world. Stalin was quite okay to live in peace even with Nazi Germany. It were Germans who started the war.
It was the Third Reich and the Soviet Union who started the war — and they remained on the same side for nearly two years.
UK, American oligarchs and Nazi Germany were on the same side from 1933 to 1939.
AT LEAST 1939. So? That doesn’t change the fact that the Third Reich and the Soviet Union decided to go in halvesies on invading and carving up Poland.
In 1938 Germany and Poland invaded Czechoslovakia and carved it up.
Stalin, at least, took only the lands which according to Anglo-French commission of 1919 should belong to Russia. Did you ever heard about Curzon Line?
Stalin, at least, took only the lands which he thought he could get away with taking because he was in an alliance with Hitler.
I see you never heard about Curzon Line. It was proposed by France and UK, not by Stalin.
Yes, I’ve heard of the Curzon Line.
If was Stalin, not France and the UK, who allied with the Nazis — until the Nazis turned on him.
A peace treaty isn’t an alliance.
France, UK, Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and many other European countries ganged up against Russia in 1939 (the same as they are doing it now). Russian diplomacy, using the contradictions between European imperialists, managed to set Germany and Italy against France and UK, so European imperialist armies started to kill each other, while Russia got a couple of years to prepare for the war. It was a great victory of Russian diplomacy.
Stalin took back what was given away at Versailles. 🇷🇺
Not so, the Soviets only moved in after the Nazis defeated the Polish government sending it into exile. At that point there was no “Poland” to invade.. Just a hoard of huns to keep back.
Stalin had every intention to let Germany and the Allies fight it out, and then send in the Red Army after the Allies were exhausted, but Hitler spoiled his agenda to take the Red Army to the Atlantic.
Nuclear disarmament is a bad idea. I think, it is also unachievable.
It’s a great idea but a pipe dream because it is unachievable.
Starting a devastating war so capitalism supporters can feel comfortable is a terrible idea.
Yes, it is terrible. The wars against Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan were devastating for those countries but very much profitable and comfortable for MIC capitalists.
No way could Churchill get the allied troops to go against Russia since they were fighting along with the Soviets to stop the Nazis who were supposed to be worse than the Soviets at the time.
The NAZIs are worse than the Soviets. They wanted to create an Aryan state.
The revisionism on Antiwar is hilarious.
Both wanted to create a ‘new kind of human,’ one based race, the other on class (working class). And, many of the points in both agendas overlapped.
In 1945, General Patton wanted to attack the Soviet Union while it was “weak”. Declassified documents indicate that remnants of the German army were to be utilized! Patton paid for his life for that idea. In my estimation, the truck collision with the jeep was no accident.
Don’t forget the US was also running out of money and couldn’t issue more war bonds.
Something else they had in ‘45 was a nest of Stalin’s agents at the top levels of FDR’s Administration. Of course he declined to join the fray.
Rolls eyes on communism. The cold war ended. Capitalism brought more was. Let’s focus on that.
I share your prognosis and depression.There may not be any history
True. And still American’s live in denial and distraction from what’s coming unless things turn around quickly. But, Wash. has no intention of ending the war since it makes a few people a lot of money. Wait until NATO decides to go in there and the killing of Americans begins, as well as a draft. That will be the turning point.
Yes, indeed. There will be a reconning. The only reason we are in Ukraine at all is because of the neocon/neoliberal abiding hatred of Russia. However, they have their sights not only on Russia but the USA as well. They never negotiate in good faith and will only be satisfied when the USA is brought down just like the seven nations on Rumsfeld’s 2001 list. By way of deception they have waged war.
Ukraine has many of our “interests” under their grounds. So does Russia.
Russia is just the latest Wash. boogieman needed to make and destroy more war industry goods and enrich those who profit from death and destruction around the world, as well as keeping those MIC funds coming into Wash. And, you’re right.
Remember all the socialist media going “the adults are back in the room!”
Then Antony Blinken and Biden deliberately sabotaged talks about stopping their economic war against Iran.
And Blinken has consistently refused to talk to Russia, the largest country in the world, with the world’s largest nuclear arsenal, even while waging proxy war against them.
And Biden’s administration pretended that a weather balloon (large countries send up thousands of those every year) was a spy balloon. So that Antony Blinken didn’t get a meeting with the Chinese.
Then he finally got a meeting, and made some progress in arranging a meeting for his boss Biden so he’ve had that to show in the next election. But Blinken had to listen to the Chinese berating him over the balloon thing and other issues, apparently for hours. Lecturing him like he lectures other countries. This enraged the geriatric-in-chief enough so that he deliberately insulted the Chinese – and posted the insults on the White House homepage. So that all diplomatic progress was undone.
Not just any country. It’s China, like Russia a possible opponent in wars.
They are using the foreign policy that affects all Americans as if it was their private plaything.
“Remember all the socialist media going ‘the adults are back in the room!'”
No, because the socialist media never said anything like that. I’m guessing that you have no idea what socialism is or which media outlets are associated with it.
“They are using the foreign policy that affects all Americans as if it was their private plaything.”
No they aren’t. They’re implementing a US foreign policy that has been fully and formally established, and pursued by the political leaders of both mainstream US political parties, since 1992. Admittedly, Biden’s implementation has been rather more ham-fisted than that of some of his predecessors.
To complete your theme: … leaders of both mainstream political parties wholly owned by the globalist oligarchs of the WEF etc. implementing policy generated by their wholly owned think-tanks, promulgated by their wholly owned mainstream media, and crafted into legislation by their fabulously ‘prestigious’ K St. law firms, and handed to their toady congress critters along with munificent quantities of slimy long-green to formalize into law.
you just described “elite socialism” – so Jon Met was correct when he termed it “socialist media”
Thanks for the laugh, …but emphatically No, …you’re besmirching my Church, … turn it 180′. All the means of production are in the private hands of George Soros, Warren Buffet, Bill Gates & Les Wexner, Bezos, Diamond, Blankfein, Black, ….
You need help
And you don’t??
Closer to a version of Mussolini national socialism by way of updated mercantilism.
Biden is just what I expected after a series of Presidents. Bush,Clinton,Obama and Trump. Screwing the people and feeding the military as well as eroding our civil rights.
Chris Hedges penned an article about what to expect from Biden. So far, he has not missed the marks Hedges laid out. Biden himself said that there would be no fundamental changes.
Socialists and some sane conservatives are on the same page. No wars with a nuclear armed country.
Addendum:
Some sane Socialists.
So what? Who makes decisions, them or the uni-party in Wash.? And, where are the anti-war protests? the world is closer to devastation than it ever has been, even closer than the Cuban crisis, which was all show anyway as history has now proven.
The World Socialist Website and most Libertarian sites agree and are on the same page, so maybe Americans should finally get a clue.
“Socialists and some sane conservatives are on the same page.”
If we change that to some socialists, I’m in agreement. But that’s not the point I was responding to. The OP clearly thinks that much of the US MSM is “socialist” and that’s utter nonsense.
Based on past experience I tend to believe the Russians,Chinese and the Iranians. The rest of the world knows who is peaceful and who is not.
The socialist media always detested the Biden administration and does so more than ever now.
True. Especially on wsws.org which exposes him daily as a fraud and lackey of capitalism and imperialism.
Because that’s the way they think. It all belongs to them. They only need the subjects during the election cycle and fundrasing, and the election bit is no longer necesary as they have figured out a way to rig the elections to stay in power indefinitely.
Blinken is a blinken idiot he should hang his head in shame haveing the gaul to call himself a Diplomat , the US or any of it`s NATO LACKEYS haven`t a Diplomat who is in the same league as Lavrov
Blinken has other loyalties and another agenda that isn’t American.
🇷🇺 I ❤️ LAVROV! 🇷🇺
Two Ukrainian generals, up to 50 other officers as well as around 20 foreign mercenaries and military advisers were eliminated in a recent Russian strike on the Kiev forces’ deployment site in Kramatorsk, the Russian Ministry of Defense announced on June 29.
CHECK THIS OUT:
Germany to station 4,000 combat troops permanently in Lithuania https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/06/28/ralp-j28.html
Ukraine’s counteroffensive remains a debacle despite efforts to exploit coup attempt in Russia https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/06/29/zuoy-j29.html