A close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin warned Wednesday that if the US destabilizes Russia like it has other nations, such as Iraq and Afghanistan, it would lead to a nuclear “dystopia.”
Dmitry Medvedev, a former Russian president and the current deputy of Russia’s security council, made the comments in a post on the Russian social media site VK.com. Medvedev said that since the end of World War II, the US has “constantly waged senseless wars” and left destruction behind without considering the consequences.
“For the past thirty years, Russia has been the target of the same mediocre and primitive game,” Medvedev said, according to a Google translation of his post. “This means that Russia must be humiliated, limited, shaken, divided and destroyed. How will this resonate in the near future in Europe and in the world as a whole? Never mind. Nobody ever even thought about it.”
Medvedev warned if the US destabilized Russia, it would lead to “the largest nuclear power with an unstable political regime, weak leadership, a collapsed economy and the maximum number of nuclear warheads aimed at targets in the US and Europe.”
Medvedev said once the US was done destroying Russia, it would move on to China next. “And then there are only a couple of steps left before the most severe global crisis, the energy and food collapse, the failure of all collective security systems and, soon, the Big Nuclear Bang,” he said.
Medvedev’s warning comes as the specter of nuclear war has been raised around Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the growing calls for the US and NATO to intervene directly. Ukrainian Volodymyr Zelensky and some hawks in Washington have been calling for the West to enforce a no-fly zone over Ukraine, which would require shooting down Russian planes and bombing missiles inside Russian territory.
A NATO-enforced no-fly zone means the US entering a direct war with Russia, which could quickly turn nuclear. Highlighting the danger of such a conflict, Putin ordered Russia’s nuclear forces to be put on “special alert” early on in the invasion. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg warned Russia on Wednesday that “it can never win a nuclear war.”
Despite the danger, the US has not shown any signs of pushing for a diplomatic solution to the war. Instead, the US is pouring weapons into Ukraine, imposing sanctions with the intention of crushing Russia’s economy and joining NATO in a new military buildup in Eastern Europe.
Medvedev was always a bit behind the curve.
Nuclear dystopia is not a warning, that’s dangling candy in front of the spoiled brat that is the Western Deep State political elites.
Just one more crisis to justify radical extremist autocratic statism.
The only ones escalating a Nuclear war are the Russians with their rhetoric and nuclear posture.
Russia’s rhetoric has not been demonizing the West. Putin calls Western leaders his ‘partners’, Biden calls Putin a war criminal, a ‘murderous dictator’ and a ‘pure thug’. It is the West escalating this.
The sad part is that if our political leaders had acted like civilized adults after the cold war ended the United States and Russia would now be friendly trade partners working together to make the world a better place. We could have been a positive influence on Russia to clean up its human rights conduct. But now that’s all down the drain, because our political leaders have been nothing but a bunch of greedy bastards who care only about their own wealth and aggrandizement.
Very well said johnnyo!
And I sincerely believe that’s what Russia wanted.
As do I, most certainly…
Clinton kicked things off. The late George Kennan said it was a mistake of enormous proportions.
You really need to be brought up to speed. If defying an agreement and bringing in 14 former Soviet bloc countries into NATO and planting missile in them with the missiles pointed at Russia, isn’t escalation….
For your reference. From GoldSilver: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6hIlfHWaGU
The US and its NATO allies are escalating a nuclear war and cold war, the Warsaw Pact was dissolved over 30 years ago. NATO should have been dissolved at that time as well. The US keeps establishing bases closer and closer to Russia’s borders.
The US would not want Russia to establish bases closer and closer to the US especially in Canada and Mexico.
Great point on NATO’s reason for being.
30 years ago was when the 700 club got embedded there in Ukraine.
Right up to about a month ago they were asking for $ to help old frail Russians (it was implied that they were IN Russia).
Not a single 700 flub outlet or office in Russia.
The Ukriane became a lawless playground for retired US Military and for off shored investments that are tax havens and a snakeoil non profits like Pat Robertson likes.
Cyber business is big there.
Pat wants the world to read Ezekiel chapter 38, verse 3; I think it is: the word Rosh is not translated from Hebrew in some versions of translations. The importance is that since Rosh sounds like Russia, you should hate Russia as if God Himself authorized it.
Rosh in hebrew means head.
Summary: USA military offensives for self preservation are tainted with bad bad religous interpretations. Yet here we go!
You are lost in space. Ither than known US tight allies. Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Japan and South Korea — do not support US. By not supporting — they recuse to condemn Russia, do not impose sanctions, and are not recognizing US right to impose sanctions without UN approval.
Not all Europesns either. Hungary is not blaming Russia, does not provide weapons, does not allow its territory fot weapons transfer. Sebia does not impose sanctions.
Thus, no Africa, Larin America, Asia other than US military allies, no Central America, not even neighbor Mexico
Pressure on them is grest, But they are asked to take sides with US, not its proxy, Ukraiine. And they do not wsnt to do that. Let us see how US handles rejection.
Just look at how many strategic weapon treaties have been abrogated and by whom.
May I?
Putin on his Dog to ‘W’ Bush: (that Vlad’s dog is)
●BIGGER
●FASTER
●SMARTER
This event followed an earlier summit of Putin with Barney -George W. Bush’s greasy smelly little nervous yap dog. George reflected (in a recent PBS interview: Their Own Words; Angela Merkel) that he thought it was simply a power play like when Putin brought his Dog (Shatzie) into a press event with Angela Merkel where the dog greeted her then sat at her feet and proceeded to licked its junk. Putin seemed amused at it all but really was visably blushed. Angela ignored them both: it’s what you do with self indulgent apex male freaks. When when you think if it in terms of who upstaged who, not even Vlad the Bad can lick his balls like a dog: Dogs 2, Human Alphas 0.
Bigger, Faster, Smarter in Design, Function and Purpose is the Russian compliment to our developing SDI since its inception: He was telegraphing to George that not only can his Hypersonic dog lick its balls too, his dog can hunt. George darling thought that it was an insecure expression of a sick-o like we often portray Russian leadership as. ‘W’ totally missed the context: SDI in any state of modernization and development cannot out-hunt existing Russian Hyper-Sonics. It was a gift shrouded in symbolism and all it left George with was to tip his head Texican-like and ponder how that he too could lick his balls like a dog. George green lit the SDI deployment we identify as Starlink by Betraying and Destroying an existing treaty signatory with the USSR because the cold war threat no longer existed: legally the USSR was defunct. It was a loophole to bring SDI of age: the STARLINK Intercept Space Gauntlet and integrated P.A. Starwars Swiss Army Knife.
The Russian Hypersonic missile can hunt compared to our leg humping ‘Barney’ Starlink Integrated P.A.T.R.I.O.T systems (where P. = Phased A.= Array). Russia was aware we had tore up the treaty to violate its intent and that we were building SDI. The whole SDI direction we were going can be traced back to when ‘W’ tore up the 1972 non-proliferation treaty that prevents its build by written contract with Russia. We betrayed the world by weaponizing space platforms with CO2 lasers to dominate with in a missile war.
We think nothing about that event that rejuvenated USA SDI but Russia expected it and had decades of secretive development of their simple solution to our SDI WMD that was based on ICBM intercept: Their’s was Bigger in effect, Faster in speed and Smarter by design. The tactical advantage over SDI! Putin was telegraphing that Russian Detente assures the M.A.D. that Starwars SDI was to overture. Putin telegraphed that Our SDI was a Futile failure before it was ever built-out.
●BIGGER●FASTER● SMARTER was Detente to USA SDI 4 decades ago.
We did not and will not listen to the poker ‘tells’ of Russia holding a great hand. We are all-in holding Aces and Eights and are gambling to win with false religious escatologies and superstitions, not with good rational empirical science.
Russia has allowed us to observe: 2,000 Km range and Mach 5+ speeds. Hypersonics are a no-gamble warfare solution to SDI. Here we are, one second to midnight.
…At the edge of the abyss…
Russia is not escalating. It is reminding the blind that Russia has nuclear weapons and therefore it is not an Iraq or a Panama. This is something that the policy makers in Washington and its vassals in Europe fail to see and understand.
Russia might be a giant gas station but it has the big stick whether they like it or not.
They try to negotiate but didn’t worked,old man didn’t bothered. But I think he confused Russia with Iraq,as he is even confusing his wife with Vice President.
No.
They showed the world a missile that we cannot track or target or intercept. A Russian response to a Missile attack can be countered and delivered before ours gets them and they have intercept ability. BEFORE OURS GETS TO THEM, a 2,000KM range Mach 5+ missile is on every NATO doorstep.
The Ukrainians became a lawless playground for the 1%.
Everyone is a victim of Russia according to those who drive the conflict.
But it was in Ukraine that Donald was looking for what Roger Stone promoted ” You can get Anything there”, RE: Ukraine.
Among those priceless things Donald got was being peed on by Ukrainian escorts. Filmed of course for blackmail but Donald has a seared conscience unlike his better: Mitt Romney.
Mitt tried to leverage Donald with the pee tape and when that failed, Mitt reminded Donald about his taxes. Again, no response.
Donald was at that time ascending in polls as Ted and the 15 others floundered.
What was Mitt doing in Poland in his campaign year (2012)?
A: THE ELECTION WAS IN THE BAG in 2016, full time spam artists and trolls overseas were manipulating the election.
The US has a ‘use first’; nuclear weapons policy, as does Russia, premised on self-defense.
Cold War I NATO doctrine has always assumed tac nukes would be used to defeat the Soviets/Russia is a conventional war, based on the assumption the Russians would attack first so this would be morally justified.
This used to extend to making sure the Russians were never morally justified to attack in the first place. Under the Globalist Neocons, this moral certitude has been tossed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_first_use
NATO neocons baiting Russia into war by fostering a hostile Russophobic Ukraine with WMD programs, unrestrained by NATO membership, while Ukraine membership in NATO is little better, does not make NATO any less the aggressor in the Russian intervention in Ukraine.
Ukraine should have been left alone and encouraged to be peaceful and neutral.
Avoiding warning and not believe that nuclear weapons option it must be on the table when there is existential threats, then what’s the point keeping nuclear weapons? Iraq would use it if Saddam had nuclear weapons,if you don’t believe that,then you must be one of the usual idiots,
If you have fire armed in your house and intruder attacked your family then what you do?
What’s the point not using the fire armed when you must protect your family?
Nuclear weapons aren’t firearms.
Even with firearms, there are rules; 10 basic ones the most relevant here being:
4. Be Sure of Your Target and What’s Beyond.
Nuclear fallout affects everyone. Shooting at an intruder and killing your neighbor because the bullet was powerful enough to shoot through walls isn’t appropriate self defense.
https://www.nssf.org/safety/rules-firearms-safety/
If it’s existential threat then he will use it you stupid bastard. This is Russia not Iraq, although If Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapons he would use it,
American use nuclear weapon even Japanese told them they are surrender but still , American blood suckers dropped the weapon.
When existential threat is there,then the time has arrived all these rules have to be broken.
You seem to use the words ‘existential threat’ very loosely.
The only ‘existential threat’ justifying use of nuclear weapons is being attacked with nuclear weapons, or so very badly losing a conventional war that pulling nukes is the only option remaining to force a ceasefire or peace treaty.
The latter is not likely to happen to Russia, the former, would likely involve NATO tactical nukes in the event of a greater European war being lost beyond Ukraine. However, Russia would tac-nuke right back so there’s no point for NATO to go there under sane leadership.
You can’t judge everything by the American standard.
US use of the atomic bomb on Japan was less about defeating the Japanese and more about sending a warning to the Russians, who had defeated the Japanese from China and Korea and taken Japan’s northernmost islands.
At the time, the full extent of the dangers of nuclear warfare were also not fully understood.
When Americans use the nuclear weapons,it’s already passed warning stage,after using the weapons you can not talk about “warnings” are you listening yourself? Justification for using weapons as a threats,we newer heard of that,you are useful idiot and you are not alone, you sounds like a useful idiot, explaining like useful idiot,behaving like a useful idiot,therefore you are useful idiot.
Why do you feel to write a comment it’s hard to understand.
You must be educated first then make educated oppinion. They made you feel that you are free to support American and European union,but they convince you to made comments like this ONLY,that’s your delusional feelings that you are free to write boring nonsense oppinion.
Russians would use nuclear weapons if there are s existential threats,that’s why America using NATO just try to destroy Russian Federation,just like they done it in Iraq,Iraq is not functioning country anymore because of Invasion,but Russian Federation is not Iraq.
Keep repeating yourself ,and you might get hypnosis to see the reality.
And ” say; I am useful idiot ” liest 40 Times and Bobs your uncle.
In most likely scenarios, the US would try to maintain the sanctions even after fighting stops. The economic war would never stop, if the US could keep it going.
The US will continue the economic war until it backfires.
It is backfiring.
The US wants Russia to feel the same effects that sanctions against Cuba, Iran, Venezuela, Syria, Afghanistan and possibly some other nations are feeling.When China surpasses the US as the world’s most prosperous economy, more and more nations will trade less with the USA until they no longer trade with the USA, At that time, the sanctions will backfire on the USA.
Sanctions already are backfiring, but this is seen as a feature not a bug.
The WEF Reset requires economic pain keep EU peasants and American plebes in line with the Neocon Elites’ New (Autocratic) World Order.
What doesn’t make sense from an America-First perspective, is that this undercuts free Western economies against autocratic Eurasian economies, when said freedom is the one advantage the West has against the larger World Heartland.
In terms of Europe First, though, this makes perfect sense, since they were the greatest soft-power benefactors of the former Rules Based International Order.
Under real capitalism, those who can’t compete fairly are replaced by those who can. Under crony capitalism, those who can cheat succeed over those that can’t, but there’s still no guarantee of staying on top.
Only under a Reset cronyist New World Order can today’s cheats stay on top; at least that’s the plan.
Time, tide, and capitalism await no-one, however. Natural forces can be manipulated and even gamed only within their natural potential.
Russia has more nukes alone than the US and our allies combined, to the tune of about a thousand more. India and Pakistan have beefs with each other, so if they launched their targets are limited to those nations. Israel would probably hold on to its 90 or so nukes just in case the neighboring Arabs states decide to have another go at them. That leaves China with a few hundred, and my guess is that unless they are directly attacked, they won’t launch on anyone- which means, if we assume everyone else expends all remaining ammo on each other, China is left as the dominant (and largely untouched) survivor. But then there’s the Soviet-era bomb shelter system still largely in place- potentially repurposed, but still functional- and when was the last time you checked your own backyard fallout shelter? LOL! As a final note, Russians- historically- are tough survivors. They’ll find a way to make it through a nuke fight. And while they’re rebuilding, we’ll probably still be arguing over who uses what bathroom.
No one will be “largely untouched”. Whose shelves are China going to stock with cheap plastic shit?
India, of course! 🙂
He already covered them. Pakistan would nuke them and vice versa. In reality, once they start going off, we are all dead.
You are assuming that after the main exchange, the world will be livable. Nuclear winter, reversal of magnetic poles or reversal of stations, not more flora and vegetation and no more animals. The preppers will survive (assuming that radiation does not finish them) for a few months and blah, blah.
Rather be dead.
World War 3 is the endgame
I must issue a warning: I have no intention of going out quietly… I am going to yell and scream at somebody before my backside gets nuked!
Can I join the chorus, Donna? 😉
The more, the merrier!
No, this is just part of the European Management Forum (WEF) Reset.
The fact that my previous reply was censored indicates the accuracy of that longer assessment.
How to identify a Russian Troll in the comments? Click on the name and you’ll see that they have posted thousands of comments, always in favor of Russia. This requires you to be in front of your computer all day doing just that. They are Paid full time Trolls.
And vice versa for American trolls?
Have you ever heard of “being retired with nothing else to do all day?” Have you met me? Moron.
As compared to what? Someone who starts posting, and only posts, in Russia/Ukraine matters and is decidedly anti-Russia? Would that be a Paid part time Troll?
There are plenty of free trolls on all sides of every controversial issue. If anyone’s paying for trolls, they’re wasting money.
easy. Anybody who disagrees with you and you cannot argue you can catalog it as a troll.
“Don Julio” joined Disqus on March 9th of this year. So one might reasonably ask if it is he who is the paid troll or CIA disinfo-bot.
The Western peak-propaganda effort ***in the West*** is near comprehensively successful. Almost all those who consume US/Western media now believe — per plan — in the evil Putin/Russia and “Russia is losing!” narrative. They’re now all on board with the “hate Russia, blame Russia, f— Russia!” war hysteria.
But propaganda cannot change the facts on the ground, where Russia is steadily and patiently achieving its objectives.
Meanwhile on the economic war front, the feeble, over-hyped, phony triumphalist “crippling sanctions” are doing more damage to the Empire of Lies, effectively killing the US dollar, while accelerating the emergence of the world’s Eurasian future.
Endeavor to persevere, “Don Julio”, whoever you really are.
All nuclear powers will use nuclear weapons when they perceive a threat to their national security. That’s what these weapons are for. Moreover, smaller tactical nuclear weapons developed in recent years lower the threshold for entering a nuclear escalation.
Anybody claiming there is no danger of a nuclear war because of MAD plays a dangerous game.
Wow! the flawless logic of the inexorable merciless dynamic of “manifest destiny”
What to say…???? I hate to see this confrontation, which was easily avoidable. Makes me wonder if this wasn’t planned when Clinton & Nuland overthrew Poroshenko. Its a real life horror tale ala Cuban Missile Crisis in reverse.
PoroshenkoYanukovych.
Not Clinton. Obama/Biden
Wonder no more. It was planned.
NATO was moribund. The planners had to consider the options. If we invade (equivalent to a coup) Ukraine and install a US puppet what will the Russians do? Watch in awe or take action?
My guess is that they thought Russia would invade. Since they annexed Crimea only they decided to keep pushing to where we are today.
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2022/03/24/will-putin-wake-up-to-the-threat-of-russias-atlanticist-integrationists/
Russia’s Atlantic Integrationists.
Dmitry Medvedev is a sober voice.
“When a man has got nothing he has nothing to lose”
Not just pretty words.
People need to realize that it is necessary to leave Russia a way out of the crisis
if they withdraw from the Ukraine.
If we dare Russia to “launch” they may indeed “launch”
I thought JFK was a pretty overrated president but he at least had the common sense to pull back from the brink.
What’s much worse than the moves so far is this new push for Poland to do a military incursion into Ukraine “to protect the refugees”, in other words, to “Save The Nazis”, as I call it. Biden is allegedly going to greenlight Poland entering Ukraine. Poland wants to in order to grab back the territory it lost decades or centuries ago. Then Biden will use that conflict to try to impose a no-fly zone – despite having allegedly ruled it out. We have a US aircraft carrier in the Med explicitly to (try to) impose a no-fly zone “in case Biden gives that order”, the Navy chief said.
Andrei Martyanov is on record as saying he believes Poland wants to claw back the Ukrainian oblasts that used to be part of Poland. He says a Polish incursion is definitely possible.
Sergei Lavrov just warned that any attempt by Poland or NATO to install “peace keepers” in Ukraine would mean war with Russia.
It all depends on how stupid Biden is going to be today at the emergency NATO meeting.
Why would the US green light a Polish invasion of Russia or a no-fly zone? US/NATO have achieved their strategic objective without committing a single soldier. Russia is bogged down in a stupid war of aggression and attrition that Russia can’t win. The claim by Ukraine that its forces attacked and heavily damaged or destroyed a major Russian landing ship in the occupied port of Berdyansk appears credible (see video link below)
Berdyansk (50 miles from Mariupol) is occupied but obviously not pacified. Putin, like so many arrogant aggressors before him deluded himself into believing that the invader’s superior military prowess would guarantee quick and complete victory over a smaller, weaker nation. Like so many before him, Putin was blind to the law of blowback. Invasion requires occupation. Occupation leads to resistance. Resistance leads to reprisals. Reprisals strengthen the resistance. Eventually the invaders leave.
We have seen protracted asymmetrical war befuddle or blow away invaders from stronger countries in Algeria, Vietnam, Ireland, Palestine, Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Yemen, Angola, Mozambique and Guinea-Bisseau, to name a few examples.
The Russian invasion appears stalled. The Ukrainian military has held out longer than anyone expected. I certainly expected Russia to have defeated or obliterated the Ukrainian regular forces by now. The resistance is growing and the Ukrainians appear to have the capacity to make an effective attack within occupied territory.
US/NATO’s goal is to keep Russia committed to a protracted war in Ukraine that removes Russia as a military and political counterweight to US/NATO imperialism in the Middle East and Africa. So far, US/NATO are achieving their objective without directly committing their military forces by sacrificing the Ukraine and its people.
US/NATO deliberately provoked Putin into launching a preemptive war of aggression. Putin took the bait. And now Russia is bogged down in a protracted war of attrition on its own borders that it can’t win. US/NATO have no need for a no fly zone and the US and the big powers of NATO will not green light a Polish invasion of Galicia that would commit NATO air power and troops to a war inside Russia.
I’d generally agree.
The pro-Russian side is trying to spin that Putin never intended a real occupation or full conquest, only a limited ‘special operation’. However, the Russian government has had to censor the word ‘war’ itself to maintain this fiction.
War is war, and can only be fought as wars are fought. Ukrainian neo-Nazis are Ukrainian Nationalist Socialists; they don’t see their brand as tainted by the German precedent.
Kherson oblast is the only oblast that could be seen as having fallen more or less according to the original Plan Z.
The Russians aren’t testing their luck in the rock tunnels of Odessa and Odessa oblast remains untouched by Russian ground forces.
I have no desire to be nuked into Freedom Fries…. Then there is another problem… My cocktail of choice (for the going out party) is a Black Russian… As you can see, that rather puts me in an awkward social position… Aside from getting nuked…
Wow Donna I couldn’t choke one of those down if I tried! You must have quite a tolerance🙂
I prefer what I refer as baby drinks..a White Russian’ll do it for me 🙂 More milk than booze!
LOL Gypsy33. I can only drink one, lol. White Russians are a good choice!
Try the “Colorado Bulldog” variant — a splash of cola in the White Russian. It’s quite good as dessert drinks go.
Sounds yummy Thomas! I was a bartender when I was a young woman; that’s a new one to me.
The carbonation gives it a sort of “ice cream soda” feel. I don’t drink much any more, but when I did and wanted a “dessert drink,” that was my usual choice.
I’m not much of a drinker either Thomas—-never was, I have a very low tolerance for alcohol.
Ever tried milk and ginger ale, half and half? Delicious, especially if you have access to Vernor’s, the original ginger ale.
No, I’ve never tried milk and ginger ale (or milk and Pepsi, like LaVerne and Shirley). For some reason that just sounds awful. But maybe I’ll give it a try on your advice (they sell Vernor’s at my local market).
“All options are on the table”
Whose favorite threat has this been for decades?
I just hope the US isn’t tempting the fates…
If Russia goes, it will be like a supernova.
“NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg warned Russia on Wednesday that “it can never win a nuclear war.””
Stoltenberg is definitely a dim light bulb. He just does not get it. It is NATO who thinks they can win a conventional war. Russia is trying to make him understand that the war will not be conventional. NATO will not pummel Russia like they did to Iraq.
Also on the MSM tonight:
Bye-Done says Amerikkka will “intervene” if Russia “employs chemical weapons”.
Please refresh my memory, someone. Was it not UKRAINE hosting AMERIKKKAN biolabs?
The Sun’s enormous sunspot is delivering some plasma in
3 days.
Just heard that Amerikkka is going to accept 300k Ukrainian refugees.
Isn’t this convenient to import more white peoples who are “civilized” and watch Netflix.
Screw all those brown-skinned people waiting at our southern border, or those brown people from the Middle East who are probably—-gasp—-MUSLIM.
Many Ukrainians are also highly skilled Western workers, already-trained in engineering and information technology as well as construction trades.
The war displaces the entire Ukraine workforce including those who could otherwise have avoided becoming an economic migrant.
Developing world migration is lite on skilled workers, while the US education system is oriented to produce consumers, not STEM grads.
NATO, NATO, NATO, makes my blood boil…
“Nuclear Dystopia”, wonderful catch phrase…
I am more concerned of what happens to the USA should it become ‘unstable’.
We already experience instability in our culture and it seems to be a global phenomenon on several fronts.
Just spitballing here but maybe we can use that NY sized Iceberg that calved off of Antarctica do some good by commercializing it?
Like for instance, we could make Iceboxes popular again! And WHO I ask you would not want to drink really old water? We bottle it!
See,.. if you just apply yourself a teensy bit, flagrant violations of reality can become real money makers! This one idea could be carbon neutral if we make the plastic bottles we put the water in totally inert so that they never have to be recycled. Imagine that floating island of plastic in the pacific and if there were any Antarctic water bottles in it, – no problem! Right!
Yup!
Alrighty
Alrighty
Alrighty
Alrighty