Since Ben & Jerry’s announced in July that it would stop selling ice cream in illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, the move has been falsely portrayed as a boycott of Israel. In an interview that aired Sunday, the company’s founders explained that is not the case.
“I think Ben & Jerry’s and Unilever are being characterized as boycotting Israel, which is not the case at all,” co-founder Jerry Greenfield told Axios on HBO. “It’s not boycotting Israel in any way.”
Greenfield and Ben Cohen sold Ben & Jerry’s to the British-based food firm Unilever back in 2000 but still maintain influence over the ice cream company’s activism. Since the settlement ban was announced, several US states have taken steps to divest from Unilever using legislation against the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement. BDS is an international campaign that seeks to pressure Israel for its crimes against the Palestinians through boycotts.
Under most states’ anti-BDS laws, the state must determine that the company is “boycotting Israel” in order to divest funds. Greenfield attributed the false claim by the US states to “misinformation.”
Cohen explained that he and Greenfield favor a two-state solution. “We were always in favor of the two-state solution, [but] the policy of the Israeli government has been to endorse the settlements in the Occupied Territories that keep making it harder and harder to actually have a two-state solution,” he said.
Both US and Israeli officials have accused the ice cream company of anti-semitism over the ban. Cohen called the accusation “absurd” since both he and Greenfield are Jewish. “I’m anti-Jewish? I’m a Jew,” he said.
Israeli officials have urged the governors of the over 30 US states with anti-BDS laws on the books to act against Ben & Jerry’s over its decision, and many are happy to comply. So far, Florida, New Jersey, Texas, and Arizona have taken steps to divest hundreds of millions in pension funds from Unilever, and more could follow.
Disclosure: Antiwar.com has received donations in the past from Ben Cohen
It’s “boycott lite”
Any attack on Israel taking more and more Palestinian properties, destroying crops, shooting protesters, is considered antisemitic by the Zionists in control of Israel.
It is readily apparent that my country, the U.S. of A. does not give a rat’s *ss about it, will keep feeding Israel with more billions, continue the tripe that Israel reserves the right to defend itself against a people with no army, no navy, no air force, no guided rockets, no drones, no radar (or “iron dome”). It is disgusting and shameful.
An AK-47 entering a home in the middle of the night will kill a person just as dead as any other weapon. The true danger to peace,Iran,is quite well armed.
“IDF Chief Says Israel Will Continue to Attack Iran”
Any objective observer would say that between the two, there is no contest as to who is the true danger to peace. I’ll bring up the assassinated scientists, the sabotage of nuclear facilities , and attacks on Iranian ships again but you will once again equate some exaggerated future threat to what is actually happening in the “here and now”.
YOU call yourself objective-how convenient. Hezbollah is a creation of Iran and not a tool of peace.
Has Hezbollah said they will continue to attack Israel? Have they attacked Israel recently ? Have they murdered any Israeli scientists, sabotaged their nuclear facilities or attacked any Israeli ships?
The true danger to peace are people like Yigal Amir who pumped two bullets into Rabin’s back to kill Oslo!!!
Agreed.But Iran also killed Oslo.
Meanwhile, when B&G were asked why they do not boycott US states with anti abortion policies, they had no real answer.
Sally Rooney Declines to Sell Translation Rights to Israeli Publisher
They are not Anti-Semitic they are Anti-Apartheid.
It should be boycott of Israel.That is, if the intention of B&J founders are genuine