The US Army is planning to revamp the way it positions and deploys its forces to become a multi-domain power by 2035 to better confront Russia and China, according to a new strategy paper released by the military branch on Tuesday.
The paper says the US faces an “unprecedented set of challenges” and hypes the threat of Russia and China on the world stage, accusing the countries of trying to replace the US as the global hegemon.
“China and Russia continue to challenge the rules-based international order. Both have become increasingly more assertive in an effort to advance their agendas, aimed at supplanting the US globally,” the paper reads. “By 2040 China and Russia will have weaponized all instruments of national power to undermine the collective wills of the United States, Allies, and partners, while simultaneously cultivating their own security partnerships.”
The paper is another example of the US military’s shift in focus away from counterterrorism in the Middle East towards so-called “great power competition” with Russia and China, as outlined by the 2018 National Defense Strategy.
To do this, the Army is focusing on “multi-domain capabilities,” which is the merging of different domains of warfighting: air, land, maritime, space, and cyberspace. The Army is building five Multi-Domain Task Forces (MDTFs) to run these types of operations. Two MDTFs will focus on the Indo-Pacific region, one will be focused on Europe, one on the Arctic, and another will be “aligned for a global response.”
The Army has been developing its multi-domain concept for years now, and currently has one MDTF operating in Washington state that focuses on the Pacific.
How will they station a force in the Arctic when they have only one broken-down Icebreaker? Russia has more than 30 of them and many, if not most are Nuclear Powered.
As soon as the U.S. and NATO win the peace in Afghanistan, they will be able to position sufficient forces in the Artic, Europe and Asia & counter the Russians
and China. It’s all the Talibans fault that the U.S. & NATO are currently unable to face these threats today!! Anyone that believes this should see that if they can’t prevail in afghanistan, they will never cow Russia & China. What do they think, we so stupid to not laugh them to death. If they cant defeat the Talibans how can they even contemplate what amounts to worldwide hegemony from the Pacific, and the Alantic Oceans, The Artic and throughout the Pacific???? It’s utter barking madness parading as rational planning. How about a footbridge to the moon too. Where is the money & personnel going to come from?????
Is it madness or just gross incompetence? Incompetence hiding behind megalomanic plans. Too big to fail?
One good thing is — war on terror is in the process of being retired. Looks like retired may be our lectures on democracy. Human rights are getting stale.
But rules based order? What rules? Anyone saw a list of those? Who drafted them, and who agreed to them?
We know of international laws, treaties, and conventions.
But nobody is yet to volunteer a rule based order provision(s) that Russia or China have violated.
The rules are:
1. US global military, dollar, information and propaganda
narrative hegemony.
2. All nations are required to acquiesce cheerfully to their
assigned place and subsidiary function within the Imperial
order.
3. Any challenge will be massively and mercilessly countered.
Additional rule: all moves shall be cloaked with idealism (freedom, democracy, yada, yada).
Forward Operating Bases are strategically critical. In addition continuing low intensity war in the mid-east is optimal for readiness.
The Deep State is fully committed to Global Hegemony. They will continue to increase the pressure on recalcitrants until they submit.
But the Deep State believes that ultimately war is unavoidable; and, has fully committed to it.
Looking on the bright side, forward operating bases also counter any possible US war-starting event which would threaten the FOBs with destruction. That’s especially true in the Persian Gulf and Korea.
it doesn’t matter who the enemy of the day is.
just as long as there is an enemy.
That “multi domain” crapola is just a ruse designed to sustain the army budget. The simple fact is that the US doesn’t need a standing army at all, Canada and Mexico are not threats, and having a half-million ground army only contributes to the chance of (and plans for) foreign wars. And the US always loses them!
Constitutional scholars out there know about Article I, Section 8 which favors a standing navy, but not a standing army:
1: The Congress shall have Power. . .
12: To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
13: To provide and maintain a Navy;
Dr. Stranglove neolibs at work. Of course they will not have their own skin in the game.
The corporate media are ramping up their anti-chinese/Russian fake news smear campaigns, so as to put vasal states (such as New Zealand) under public pressure. So far the current Ardern government has resisted, but for how long before they cave in?