Iran rejected calls from French President Emmanuel Macron for new
nuclear talks with Iran that would include countries not involved in negotiating the 2015 deal, like Saudi Arabia.
“The nuclear accord is a multilateral international agreement ratified by UN Security Council Resolution 2231, which is non-negotiable and parties to it are clear and unchangeable,” Saeed Khatibzadeh, Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman, said on Saturday.
Saudi Arabia’s Al Arabiya TV reported the comments from Macron on Friday. “Negotiations with Iran will be very strict and it will be necessary to include our partners in the region in the nuclear agreement, including Saudi Arabia,” the French president said.
Macron’s call for “strict” negotiations is a sign that France does not favor a return to the 2015 deal, known as the JCPOA. But Iran has been clear that they want the original agreement they negotiated, which was violated by the US in 2018 when the Trump administration re-imposed sanctions on the Islamic Republic.
Iran has also rejected demands from the Biden administration to come back into compliance with the JCPOA before the US does. Iran’s Foreign Minister Javad Zarif reminded the Biden administration that it was the US who violated the deal, and so it is on the US to revive it.
While on the campaign trail, President Biden said he would return to diplomacy with Iran to revive the JCPOA. But over a week into his presidency, all of the crippling economic sanctions the Trump administration imposed on Iran are still in effect.
The approach of the West to Iran under President Biden is no different to the Trump regime – the perceived “national interests” are the same: the very reasons nations go to war. Events in the Middle East are intrinsically linked with the coming confrontation with China, where the new administration has the same objectives as the last. Gradually it is bringing these two superpowers to war – world war.
https://www.ghostsofhistory.wordpress.com/
Little brother Macron wants to be heard. Biden, send him to bed now with his pacifier.
You’ll have to wake up Sleepy Joe first.
Biden is banking on EU-3 to team up with, hoping to persuade Iran to come around. But Trump’s withdrawal from JCPOA has badly tarnished our trustworthiness & has given ample leverage to the Hawks in Iran, empowering them to refuse to reengage in any negotiations with the U.S., regardless of EU-3’s insistence, arm-twisting, or empty promises (remember INSTEX)! After what Trump did, even some moderates in Iran have lost faith in the fruitfulness of any renewed or modified agreements with the U.S.; noteworthy to mention how severely the Moderates’ position in Iran’s politics has been diminished ever since. The hardliners have the upper hand & will do their best to maintain it until June to turn their presidential election result in their favor. I would do the same I were them! The only way Biden can hope for some success in this endeavor is to make a few meaningful concessions in advance, & that’s a non-starter as far as Israel & 3 Arab Gulf nations are concerned. Therefore, it is a fair assessment to assume that JCPOA is already dead, sorry to say!
The US, and now the EU3, are not “agreement-capable” … Iran should base its economy on other things.
All of this is just posturing for the masses deliberately designed to get “No” for an answer. As with Trump, Biden & Macron have their orders: Israel wants regime change.
Biden can either continue to do what Trump did, or he can stop doing what Trump did.
Those are the only two choices.
There is nothing Biden can do that would make Trump’s actions work better for Biden than they did for Trump. It is fantasy to imagine electing Biden will make what Trump did now work.
Trump did the same things Obama did. Who did the same things Bush did. Who did the same things …
Underneath the theatrics, Trump was business as usual. It wasn’t his policies “the establishment” had trouble with. It was that he was trying to jump the line and buy his family’s way in to the inner club, like old Joe Kennedy or Sam Bush did only without even bothering to go through the motions of e.g. sacrificing a kid over the English Channel or almost sacrificing one over the Pacific, or even making a pretense of working his way up the ladder.
As it relates to the Middle East, it all began with Daddy Bush’s military action against Iraq, albeit after our Ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, assured Iraq that we had no interest in how the dispute between Iraq and Kuwait over Kuwait’s theft of Iraqi oil, was resolved.
Sure, Obama had no intentions of fulfilling the agreement. It was a device to embark upon transformation of Iran into a Shah-style entity, entry point to Caspian region.
Trump just changed the tactics, and Biden will continue the process of regime change objectives.
But I have no idea that there is actually an exclusive club, where some are expected to pay the admission in blood. How did Clintons make it?
“How did Clintons make it?”
By climbing the ladder, winning two terms, and managing to leverage the Democratic Leadership Council into a takeover of the DNC. They didn’t just buy their way in like the Bushes or Kennedys, or like Trump tried to.
Negotiating the Iran Deal is not the same thing as walking out of it.
In another sense you are right, the Iran Deal itself is “stop Iran’s fantasy nukes” in the service of fantasy fears. Yet the one way of doing it is not the same as the other.
Also, so what if Iran had nukes. Israel does. Pakistan does. India does, and reality check — Modi is as crazy as any of them. North Korea does. None of them are destroying the world, and nor would Iran. It would just mean the US cannot attack Iran with the ease and safety to which it is accustomed to flailing about attacking all and sundry.
Neither candidate we had on offer, nor any other candidate, would actually stop the demonizing and make peace with Iran. It could be done, and they just won’t do it. They are serving something else, something other than reality.
Still, the making Iran Deal and abrogating the Iran Deal are not the same.
“stop the demonizing”
Graham: Do you still consider Iran the largest state sponsor of terrorism?
Blinken: I do.
In a nutshell. How can you even have diplomacy with someone you describe as a state sponsor of terror?
That “largest sponsor of terrorism” is the biggest piece of bs that everyone takes as the gospel inasmuch as it’s been repeated without pushback for many years now.
Bipartisan too.
With Trump gone the way of Nixon, Macron now becomes MBS’s new favorite chew-toy.
No matter your bias, Trump had it right.
Split the ME into winners and losers.
A united Arab front with the US (and Israel) against
Iranian dominance.
It changed the calculus,
it was unifying and progressive, now, it returns to a useless stalemate.
M. K. Bhadrakumar, commenting from India, has a view on Iran . .excerpts–
As mother used to say: “We’ll see.”