The US and China are playing a geo-political chess game in the Asia-Pacific region that could develop into a new cold war, as US allies adopt more aggressive postures toward China amidst increased militaristic meddling from Washington.
The Obama administration’s so-called “Asia-Pivot,” is an aggressive policy that involves surging American military presence throughout the region with the aim of containing China’s rise.
Part of this strategy involves reaffirming defense treaties with US allies in the region, like Japan and the Philippines, both of which have ongoing territorial disputes with China over uninhabited island strips in the neighborhood.
Chinese analysts see the US “as militaristic, offense-minded, expansionist, and selfish,” according to Andrew J. Nathan and Andrew Scobell in Foreign Affairs.
According to Nathan and Scobell, “China is the only country widely seen as a possible threat to U.S. predominance. Indeed, China’s rise has led to fears that the country will soon overwhelm its neighbors and one day supplant the United States as a global hegemon.”
They add that America “is the most intrusive outside actor in China’s internal affairs, the guarantor of the status quo in Taiwan, the largest naval presence in the East China and South China seas, the formal or informal military ally of many of China’s neighbors, and the primary framer and defender of existing international legal regimes.”
Washington has been building new military bases and refurbishing old ones in the region in order to lay the ground-work for an “air-sea battle” with China. The idea is to have enough US bases peppered throughout the region so that China would be too surrounded to safely attack.
A recent report from the CSIS predicted that next year “could see a shift in Chinese foreign policy based on the new leadership’s judgment that it must respond to a US strategy that seeks to prevent China’s reemergence as a great power.”
“Signs of a potential harsh reaction are already detectable,” the report said. “The US Asia pivot has triggered an outpouring of anti-American sentiment in China that will increase pressure on China’s incoming leadership to stand up to the United States. Nationalistic voices are calling for military countermeasures to the bolstering of America’s military posture in the region and the new US defense strategic guidelines.”
Aren´t we biting the hand that feeds us? Which means we´ve now we´ve become a belligerent beggar nation.
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90883/8057776.h…
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90782/8057324.h…
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90782/8057634.h…
Things 'seem' better than ever between the US and China…
'Cold-war'/'Hot-war'…??? All of this is complete hyperbole…
Thanks….
One of the major causes of war is, "Because they can." Nations won't go to war if they can't. They might if they can, then it becomes a decision balancing vital interests of war and peace.
Translate it to a specific, the complex events of the start of the Pacific War: the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor for many reasons, but an absolute key reason was that they could.
The oil embargo pushed them to war. Their own aggression on China cornered them into hostility with the US. Their concern for secure access to vital resources actually threatened, and defensive positioning against allowing others to get too close to them just like British concern for Belgium, pushed them to attack China as much as any drive for aggrandizement. But without those aircraft carriers, and the ability to sneak up, and the juicy target in reach, it would never have happened.
This works both ways. What seems defensive to one side can seem aggressive to the other, but there is an objective truth too. Some things create vulnerability and instability. Some create stability by removing the temptation of the possible. A combination of circumstances made Pearl Harbor possible, and changing those could have changed events.
We must be careful that our deployments around China now remove the potential for a successful attack on us, rather than creating an environment in which it is possible. At the same time, we must not create a potential for our own attack, lest our own neocons in a next administration be tempted as much as the Chinese feel insecure and begin an arms race.
Balance. Moderation in all things. Understand our own moves, for their real full potential and risks. Don't just posture and bluster and pivot and demonize. It is far too important to forget the oldest lessons.
Americas intenstions almost since it's creation has been empire.Constant war for 300 years.America has spilled more blood than any country in the worlds history.The same people that controlled the USSR control America,and remember the government of the USSR murderd between 80 and 120 million Russians.Americas better never allow the government to take their right to bear arms witch they are trying in every way to make happen.If Americans allow this I see another genocide like in the USSR.The military did a poll and 40 persent of them said they would disarm the public if orderd.Well that leaves 60% still doing what they took an oath to do defend the people from enemys even from within.300 million Americas with a military of a lttle over 1 million,the government can not win it's impossible,and very few things are.Any American government that tryed this is breaking the law not a first time LOL,but if allowed would be the worst.A government should fear the people not the other way around.
As somebody who works in China for what was once a great US manufacturer. No freaking way. It ain't happening. Don't pay any attention to it. It is all domestic politics.