Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) railed against his colleagues in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Tuesday for voting to arm elements of the Syrian opposition, saying they chose to fund “the allies of al-Qaeda.”
“This is an important moment,” Paul said following the vote. “You will be funding, today, the allies of al Qaeda. It’s an irony you cannot overcome.”
The Senate bill, co-sponsored by senators Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and Bob Corker (R-TN), authorizes the United States to directly arm Syrian rebels that have gone through a so-called vetting process.
“Paul offered an amendment that would strike the bill’s weapons provision,” reports John Hudson at Foreign Policy, “but it was rejected along with another Paul amendment ruling out the authorization of the use of military force in Syria.”
For more than a year, the CIA has been facilitating the delivery of arms from countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar to Syrian rebel groups, although the Obama administration has stopped short of a decision to directly arm the rebels. This bill is aimed at pushing the president in that direction.
“The evidence is mounting that Syria has become a magnet for Sunni extremists, including those operating under the banner of Al Qaeda,” The New York Times almost a year ago. And in the past year, that reality has metastasized, with Jabhat al-Nusra – categorized by the State Department as an official terrorist organization with ties to al-Qaeda – developing into the rebels’ main fighting force.
Rand Paul was evidently skeptical of claims that rebels receiving arms will be vetted to ensure extremists don’t receive them. And with good reason: the process is made up of untrustworthy, third-party sources and intelligence officials told the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times as far back as a year ago that the truth is that the U.S. doesn’t know who is getting the money and weapons.
Eager to get more involved in the Syrian civil war, the Senate committee pledged to send arms to groups with known ties to jihadist extremists. The blowback from America’s last such venture, with the Afghan mujahideen in the 1980s, was the infamous terrorist attacks on New York and Washington on September 11, 2001.
How it will blow back at America in the future is not yet known.
Our voting majority being the 51% most wealthy, their command has gone out, "Plunder… Plunder… Plunder… The more brutal the imperialism all the more better."
And if we should invade Iran, their first question will be, "Can we do the same to Venezuela?"
So one could suppose that the US Senate supports and wholly endorses cannibalism. You know that lung-eating al-Nusri guy? Dang, the US Senate is in some uncharted and really icky waters now.
Wait, Nusri? Nusra? Lung sushi?
What's the punishment for providing material support to terrorists again?
Ah, good one…It's about time someone put the Senate on the Terrorist Watch list – and the No Fly list, too for good measure.
Yes mr. Rand Paul.., they are very close friends by now.., they been used before.., since 1990s in Yugoslavia and Afghanistan and then Iraq and now in Libya and Syria, I am talking about those who produce these embeciles like Saudi Arabia and other look alike regimes.
The bad part of it is that these figures have much bigger demands now then 1990s.
And what did the Republicans say about WHO in Providing that material support, ANYBODY!
Hey they could try out those Drones in a Domestic setting on those Terrorist Americans that provide that material support!
They do this shit, and yet we at antiwar.com are the "threat to national security".
Al-Qaida, isn´t that the same group our leaders in Washington held solely responsible for the 9-11 attacks on our largest city and capital?
"You are either with us or against us."
nice to see that Uncle Sam and al-Qaeda have made up and are now bosom buddies again, just like in the old days.
i keep hearing 'the cia' did this and the 'cia' did that.we need to get rid of the cia,nsa,fbi, all of these 'branches' of justice.who in the hell is at the wheel? we need to restructure this big gov. with new citizens who go by the supreme law of the land.period.