Obama's entire counter-insurgency strategy relies on Afghan security forces to hold back the Taliban. Even this has failed.
The US decision to scale back joint operations with Afghan security forces was said to be aimed at avoiding more insider attacks, but many wonder whether it is the beginning of the end of President Obama’s main strategy in Afghanistan.
Insider attacks, in which Afghan security forces turn their guns on their US-NATO counterparts, have dramatically increased this year, with more than 50 troops, mostly American, killed in 2012. The US expected these incidents to rise following unrest caused by an insulting anti-Muslim film that caused anti-US protests across the Muslim world.
In response, NATO pulled back its cooperation with Afghan forces. Officials claim it is only partial and temporary, but this isn’t the first time it has happened and the deteriorating security situation in Afghanistan is making the failure of the war more blatant than ever.
Former US Ambassador to Afghanistan Ryan Crocker said on Tuesday that the Taliban has infiltrated the US-backed Afghan security forces to a much more extensive degree than US officials have been willing to admit.
President Obama’s entire counter-insurgency strategy in Afghanistan rested on building up, arming, and training Afghan police and military to serve as a bulwark against the Taliban. If that tactic has failed, then the war mission itself has conclusively failed.
Last 5 posts by John Glaser
- Kerry Warns Assad: More Help to Rebels If You Do Not Negotiate - May 14th, 2013
- Senators Discuss Revising 2001 AUMF - May 7th, 2013
- US Accuses Chinese Military of Cyber-Attacks - May 7th, 2013
- US Doubts UN Claims That Syrian Rebels Used Sarin - May 6th, 2013
- UN: Syrian Rebels Used Chemical Weapons - May 6th, 2013