Iran Aims to Patrol Warships Off US Coast in Coming Years

Iran aims to put its warships in international waters off the coast of the United States “in the next few years,” the head of the Iranian navy, Admiral Habibollah Sayyari said on Tuesday.

US warships in the Persian Gulf

The official statement, issued on Iranian state TV, was a direct rhetorical response to the Obama administration’s beefed up military and naval presence in the Persian Gulf, less than 100 miles off the Iranian coast.

The truth is, the Iranians make this claim every once in a while – probably less as a statement of actual planned policy and more to show the US what it might be like to have a taste of its own medicine.

“Like the arrogant powers that are present near our marine borders, we will also have a powerful presence close to American marine borders,” Sayyari said almost exactly a year ago.

For years the United States has patrolled a fleet of Navy warships off the Iranian coast in the Persian Gulf, something seen as threatening to Tehran. In January of last year, the Obama administration accelerated the deployment of military vessels off the Iranian coast and placed antimissile systems in at least four Arab countries neighboring Iran.

Most notable is the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet based in Bahrain – less than 160 miles off the Iranian coast – which directs operations in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, and Arabian Sea and secures the Straits of Hormuz, through which 40 per cent of the world’s seaborne oil passes. It is one of the largest military forces in the region, with over 40 vessels and close to 30,000 personnel.

In April, Washington sent another aircraft carrier into the Persian Gulf. Commander Amy Derrick-Frost of the Bahrain-based 5th Fleet said the deployment was “routine and not specific to any threat.”

Exactly: flooding the Gulf with warships and aircraft carriers holding fighter jets is certainly routine and targets no actual threat. They’re there to police the world and threaten Iran.

When Obama accelerated the deployment of warships to the Gulf in 2010, the New York Times described it as “part of a coordinated administration strategy to increase pressure on Iran” and also “intended to counter the impression that Iran is fast becoming the most powerful military force in the Middle East.”

Onboard the USS Abraham Lincoln in the Gulf’s Strait of Hormuz last February, BBC reporter Jonathan Beale explained, “This carrier and these [fighter] jets are more than just a show of force, they’re here to send a clear message to Iran as to who really controls these waters.”

The US has Iran militarily encircled and there is bipartisan consensus that this is necessary and legitimate. But if the roles were reversed for a moment, as Sayyari suggested, the US would view it as a virtual declaration of war.

Last 5 posts by John Glaser

Author: John Glaser

John Glaser writes for Antiwar.com.

  • MoT

    Of course it's a virtual declaration of war. Only the Americans would view their actions as being noble while everyone else as suspect or evil.

  • james

    This is American Exceptionalism, meaning nobody can do it Except Americans.

  • backblow

    "They’re there to police the world and threaten Iran."

    No they're not, they're there to bully the world into doing Washington's bidding. Also, "policing" implies both consent and enforcing laws. But who elected the Americans to this job when the United Nations is available and what would one think of police that regularly break the law and make laws up to suit themselves.

  • peter vojta

    Unfortunaly, this move would not decrease any tensionsin todays unjust world.
    I would increase as much as possible cooperation with China even if it would mean building chinese Naval bases and other military instalations. Unpopular with Iran, but situacion asks for extreme and unpopular messures…Clear and visible detergence is needed against arrogant Zionism….peter czech

  • Jim

    Sauce, goose, gander.

  • anti_republocrat

    "…they’re here to send a clear message to Iran as to who really controls these waters."

    Hubris. I don't pretend to know Iran's military capabilities, or the capabilities of it's anti-ship missiles or the US Navy's countermeasures. However, one thing is indisputable: you can't sink a land mass and recently invading a neighboring country 1/3 the size didn't work out so well for the US.

  • urlame

    you people are fools if you think the world would be a better place with an islamic and satanically influenced state like Iran making the rules. If you long for the good old days when the US wasn't so strong and the world was open to abuse and up for any brutal dictator to come along and do as he pleases with your family members and friends, then go kill yourselves because that situation should never exist on this planet again. And since you're going to say that the US is the brutal dictator, doing as they please…then why haven't they completely wiped out Iran and all other opponents? …because they have to actually follow rules set by other nations…something brutal dictatorships (like Iran) don't do!