Obama’s ‘Red Line’ in Syria: Use of WMD
The President said Monday the use or movement of chemical or biological weapons in Syria would prompt direct military intervention
President Barak Obama told reporters on Monday that any use of chemical or biological weapons in Syria would be a “red line” for his administration, prompting direct military intervention in the civil conflict in Syria.
“The red line for us is if we start seeing a bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized,” Obama, speaking in a surprise appearance at the White House press conference Monday, said. “That would change my calculus.”
So far, the calculus has been to support the disorganized, unpopular, criminal and terrorist rebel groups trying to overthrow the regime of Bashar al-Assad, but to hold back on any direct military engagement inside Syria.
“We are monitoring the situation very carefully, and have put together a range of contiengency plans and communicated in no uncertain terms with every player in the region that is a red line for us,” Obama said.
Some of those other players, including Turkey, seem to be pressuring the administration towards direct military intervention or at least a no fly zone. Current policies in place remain the administration’s official approach, although the President did authorize increased humanitarian aid to Syrian refugees.
Last 5 posts by John Glaser
- Kerry Warns Assad: More Help to Rebels If You Do Not Negotiate - May 14th, 2013
- Senators Discuss Revising 2001 AUMF - May 7th, 2013
- US Accuses Chinese Military of Cyber-Attacks - May 7th, 2013
- US Doubts UN Claims That Syrian Rebels Used Sarin - May 6th, 2013
- UN: Syrian Rebels Used Chemical Weapons - May 6th, 2013





Dr.Khan
August 21st, 2012 at 10:51 am
Death RACE Part 1000.Directed by Obamiates.,WHITE HOUSYWOOD.
Pitchfork
August 21st, 2012 at 11:00 am
It goes without saying (literally, unfortunately), but the President and his handlers have ZERO authority to use military force in Syria. The jackasses.
liberal
August 21st, 2012 at 11:32 am
NB: Chemical weapons aren't true WMD. Various studies show they're not necessarily much more efficient in killing than high explosive.
MoT
August 21st, 2012 at 12:00 pm
Oh!… So now the ghost of WMD's past has been resurrected once again? How pathetic.
Johnny_Warbucks
August 21st, 2012 at 1:58 pm
Does that redline apply to the US as well? How about Isreal?
Guest
August 21st, 2012 at 5:50 pm
WMD used to refer to nuclear weapons (weapons of mass destruction}. Now it means Whatever the Militarists Demand, as an excuse for their next invasion, occupation, or regime change.
We have seen this excuse in Libya just last year, in Iran for many years, and now Syria, formerly a waystation in the US worldwide torture network.
Klyde
August 21st, 2012 at 6:21 pm
He really is earning that Nobel Peace Prize aint he?
Yonatan
August 21st, 2012 at 8:01 pm
The British SAS 'liberated' some chemical weapons precursors from Libya. Watch out for sudden discoveries of such precursors in Syria.
From Obama’s Syria ‘Red Line’ to the Covert Ops We Don’t Know About « Antiwar.com Blog
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:11 am
[...] Obama this week defined his “red line” for the Syria conflict, warning that if the Syrian government’s chemical and [...]