Special operations forces from the U.S. and its allies have been on the ground in Syria since at least December, according to confidential emails from the private intelligence firm Stratfor that were released by WikiLeaks.
An analyst from Stratfor claimed in December 2011 that officials at the Pentagon clued him in on covert military operations taking place in Syria. “After a couple hours of talking, they said without saying that SOF [Special Operations Forces] teams (presumably from US, UK, France, Jordan, Turkey) are already on the ground focused on recce [reconnaissance] missions and training opposition forces,” the email said.
“One Air Force intel guy (US) said very carefully that there isn’t much of a Free Syrian Army to train right now anyway, but all the operations being done now are being done out of ‘prudence,'” it continued. “They have been told to prepare contingencies and be ready to act within 2-3 months, but they still stress that this is all being done as contingency planning, not as a move toward escalation.”
Publicly, the Obama administration has retreated from its initial refusal to stay out of the conflict in Syria by agreeing this week to provide direct humanitarian and communications assistance to the Syrian opposition. While the official line remains to keep military options off the table for now, the change in policy could open the flood gates for expanded military intervention.
Complicating the official story, a report coming out of Lebanon this week claimed 13 French soldiers were captured in the Syrian city of Homs. The French Foreign Ministry denied the claims, saying there are no ground troops in Syria.
According to the Stratfor analyst, after rejecting the prospect of “an eventual air campaign,” the officials at the Pentagon told him “the idea ‘hypothetically’ is to commit guerrilla attacks, assassination campaigns, try to break the back of the Alawite forces, elicit collapse from within.”
The extent to which the information exchanged in the conversation was “hypothetical” is not clear and no U.S. official has made any comment on the information in the leaked email. The discussion appeared focused on contingency planning and the phrase “they said without saying” is never elaborated on. The date of the email coincides roughly with the first public reports of secret contingency planing in December.
Information in a report on Stratfor’s website published March 7, 2012, appears to have been taken at least partially from this very email. It reads: “The U.S. military indeed has updated its order of battle for Syria in preparation for any contingency operations, and this work allegedly produced the best order of battle the United States has had on Syria since 2001. However, contingency plans exist for numerous countries with which war is unlikely.”
In congressional sessions with top military officials on Wednesday, some in Congress expressed frustration with current policy, as articulated by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and others. “I get irritated, I get angry,” McCain insisted, accusing the U.S. military of “standing on the sidelines” instead of waging an all out war on Syria, as he proposed on Monday.
How easily we accept the fact that our own government lies to the Nation. We all knew that it was happening, they all knew that we knew, but Billary Clinton and Ms. Rice kept "shaming" Russia and China shamelessly, telling the world about few brave rebels with no food or ammunition..
How is this not terrorism? I don't mean in some abstract way … I'm asking, how does this not fit the legal definitive definition of terrorism that our government uses? Should Obama be thrown in Gitmo if that is the case? lol
it's not against the US, therefore it's not terrorism. simple
Infiltration, subversion, assassinations, sabotage, incitement of dissidents, provoking internal conflict, exploiting religious and tribal differences, invoking humanitarian intervention, and then … REGIME CHANGE!
McCain should have died in his own excreta in Vietnam.
I reported much of this back in December in The American Conservative magazine in my regular column "Deep Background."
for some reason the editor's here at antiwar didn't see fit to acknowledge your information, or sibel edmonds' before that.
Is it possible the John McCain is clueless on this matter? I would suspect the Special forces operation to be true and McCain to be not in the loop. I suspect that McCain would be consider a security risk. The man pushed for any attack to get a 30 second of high in having his picture on the news. I would question if McCain is too close to the nation of Israel just like his father was in charge of the investigation of the USS Liberty only to sweep it under the rug.
Sen McCain would have been a natural for one of the leading roles in the movie "Dr. Strangeglove". He would have been a natural for riding the nuke to its target!!
The big question is how reliable is this e-mail. It seems improbable that a company like Stratfor would be so easy to hack and one therefore must suspect deliberately-planted disinformation. Equally, it is hard to beleive that Stratfor staff would babble so unguardedly in an e-mail. Moreover, we had the same "forces are already on the ground" rumors in regard to Libya, all of which turned out to be false. I would take all of this with a large grain of salt, therefore.
Its interesting how "Citizen McCain" is suddenly so concerned about the conditions of life & treatment of the arabs in Syria while remaining so indifferent to the harsh oppression of the palestinians. Maybe it is because McCain is more of a 'U.S. Senator from Israel' than from Arizona.
To lisen to you people-you would thnk that Iran is a bastion of peace and justice, and all the evil in the world comes form the US and Israel. The US power elite are evil, the Israelis are far from angels. Iran blew up an Israeli embassy-an act of war.Iran blew up a Jewish cultural center in Argentina, killing men ,women, and children. Iran preaches genocide, and has armed the Hezbollah genocide army to the teeth. When war comes, the man in the street everywhere will suffer;perhaqps a few idelologues will be happy. The geenral tone here in this site is"peace in our time". As Stalin referred to leftists-"usefull idiots"
"This is an international conflict pitting an unholy triple alliance of NATO imperialists, Gulf State despots and Muslim fundamentalists against an independent secular nationalist regime…. The Western-backed Syrian National Council and the Turkish and Gulf States-armed “Free Syrian Army” flatly rejected Russian and Chinese calls for an open dialogue and negotiations which the Assad regime has accepted. NATO and Gulf State dictatorships are pushing their proxies to pursue violent “regime change”, a policy which already has caused the death of thousands of Syrians. US and European economic sanctions are designed to wreck the Syrian economy, in the expectation that acute deprivation will drive an impoverished population into the arms of their violent proxies. In a repeat of the Libya scenario, NATO proposes to “liberate” the Syrian people by destroying their economy, civil society and secular state… A Western military victory in Syria will merely feed the rising frenzy of militarism. It will encourage the West, Riyadh and Israel to provoke a new civil war in Lebanon. After demolishing Syria, the Washington-EU-Riyadh-Tel Aviv axes will move on to a far bloodier confrontation with Iran. – The Bloody Road to Damascus: The Triple Alliance’s War on a Sovereign State"
The Road To Damascus Is Paved With Lies
http://notionalvalue.blogspot.com/2012/03/road-to…