The Obama administration will begin talks with the Iraqi government on a new long-term defense agreement that may include an expanded number of U.S. troops, according to Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s chief policy aide.
The scope and depth of the new defense relationship is not decided yet, but the Obama administration is reportedly “open to Iraqi suggestions.”
“One of the things we’re looking forward to doing is sitting down with the Iraqis in the coming month or two to start thinking about how they want to work with” the U.S. military, Michele Flournoy said.
The U.S. completed a “withdrawal” of most of the troops from Iraq in December after the Maliki government and the Iraqi parliament rejected repeated Obama administration proposals to keep a large contingency force there for the foreseeable future. Obama then dishonestly tried to take credit for ending the unpopular war and occupation.
That Obama would try to take credit for the withdrawal even as the U.S. was essentially kicked out was bad enough. But now it seems the administration simply waited for the lie to be written into the history books, only to dump more troops in once the dust settled.
In order to put more troops in, the Obama administration has had to be very supportive of the Maliki regime, despite a dramatic and violent turn towards dictatorship. American money and weapons continue to flow to Maliki, even as he dismantles the press, attacks political opponents, uses excessive force towards political dissent, and conducts mass arrests and widespread torture.
The U.S. wants extra troops in Iraq for several reasons, foremost of which is to serve as bulwark against neighboring Iran, recently the target of increasing aggression. The long-standing American tradition of propping up brutal client states in order to implement imperial designs seems to be repeating once again in Iraq.
So, essentially, Obama is creating a new Saddam Hussein. We have to wonder if the deal will also include an eventual attack on Iran and another U.S.-supported 10-year war against a nation that dares to stand against U.S. oil imperialism?
Let's face it, no one can be surprised at this. they were just told to leave. Left,…sort of. And now they're wanting to start up discussions about getting back in? Ya gotta hand it to them, they never quit, and shame and embarrassment have no effect. So it appears that Plan B was: complete the phony, politically-motivated "withdrawal", thus hoodwinking the US public into thinking Obama has gotten the US out (while leaving ten airbases worth of essential personnel — ie "trainers" — in place) and then, quietly, behind the scenes, open up the bribery spigot, and start over.
Damn fine Plan B. Some day some historian will provide us with a score sheet for these "negotiations" showing just how much cash each member of the Iraqi parliament held out for,…right next to a list of the monies doled out to the US Congress by AIPAC.
Its really hard to get rid of uncle Sam once you let him into your country. He's the guest who never leaves.
So disgusting…
A new base? What number is that?
Hello! I think it is difficult to choose the only right opinion and the way of behavior in the world of policy since every party has its own views. This situation is not an exception. I hope that two countries will achieve a compromise at last which will make sense fro both of them.