US in Secret Talks With Egypt’s Military Rulers on Israeli Peace Treaty
Mohamed ElBaradei suspects there are secret talks, which would be characteristic of US meddling in Egyptian affairs
The United States is engaged in secret talks with Egypt’s military rulers in order to ensure the newly elected Islamic leadership remains faithful to Egypt’s peace treaty with Israel, according to top Egyptian opposition figure Mohamed ElBaradei.
Some in the U.S. and Israel have expressed concern that the elections putting the Islamist parties in power may cause Egyptian policy to reflect the will of the Egyptian people and prompt a withdrawal from the treaty. But the Muslim Brotherhood and the Al Nour Party have dismissed these concerns.
ElBaradei, the former director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, appeared on Iran’s Fars news outlet and claimed the U.S. had been talking with Egypt’s Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) to ensure the treaty with Israel was maintained.
“The negotiations were completely secret and confidential,” he said, adding that the ruling military said “that the talks were about bilateral and mutual relations, but I believe that Americans wanted to ensure that the deals signed between Egypt and Israel will remain intact if Islamists ascend to power.”
If true, this would not be uncharacteristic of U.S. policy. After decades of propping up former dictator Hosni Mubarak, the U.S. has meddled with Egypt’s leadership ever since the revolution. First, U.S. pressure tried to get Mubarak’s Vice President Omar Suleiman to replace Mubarak as their favored dictator. Following that, money and weapons have been consistently sent to SCAF as they’ve solidified their undemocratic rule and continued brutal repression of reform-minded protesters.
Last 5 posts by John Glaser
- US, European Officials Dismiss Claims of Iran-Qaeda Connection - February 22nd, 2012
- Iran's Ayatollah Khamenei: We Will Never Seek Nuclear Weapons - February 22nd, 2012
- Israel Approves Construction of 695 Housing Units in West Bank - February 22nd, 2012
- Yemenis Elect New US Puppet in Sham Single-Candidate Election - February 21st, 2012
- Children Abused by Somali Militants, Some With US Support - February 21st, 2012





MvGuy
December 27th, 2011 at 9:28 pm
Crazy, counterproductive hubristic ,and anti-democratic…… Wait until there IS a government and THEN negotiate with the elected officials….. The ARMY does not belong in the treaty business…. It's a civilian and diplomatic area of governance… Should the army have input into any treaty…??? Of course…!!! Should the army be doing the negotiations…??? No, elected leaders and diplomats appointed BY those elected leaders should speak for the nation… Otherwise it's military dictatorship…. because they are NOT elected…!!!
Cloak And Dagger
December 28th, 2011 at 12:40 am
I am glad that we have no problems at home, freeing our government to meddle in Egypt's business for our bff!
</sarcasm>
ghouri
December 28th, 2011 at 2:35 am
There will be no change and will be business as usual. Islamic govt. would like to get justice for Palestinians which is in the interest of america and Israelis.
In the beginning if america creates situation like afghanistan to reject and create problems for Taleban american interest will be saved otherwise like afghanistan.
American problem is not to accept independent govt.s and the mind set is dictation around the world.
foodoo
December 28th, 2011 at 3:13 am
Yet again we must buy Israel friends…
Roger Lafontaine
December 28th, 2011 at 3:53 am
Yes, put all that pressure on Egypt to honor the 'peace treaty with Israel' but put not an ounce of pressure on Israel to honor the Oslo accords with Palestinians. Honest broker indeed.
rybo1
December 28th, 2011 at 5:46 am
The US is always in secret talks with someone, because they're too sneaky to be anything close to transparent.
tomofsnj
December 28th, 2011 at 6:02 am
Why should be get involved? We need to leave the area. We have been causing trouble for too long.
@Unforgiven_01
December 28th, 2011 at 6:59 am
“The negotiations were completely secret and confidential … ” A.K.A. we don't want you to know how much it's costing you to bribe them.
baz
December 28th, 2011 at 7:23 am
open up the swiss bank accounts and print a few more dollars for our new dictators
JDonald
December 28th, 2011 at 8:03 am
The US concerns that a new government in Egypt might try to reflect the "will of the people" is totally undemocratic. Ruthless dictators should always be able to be bribed by the USA to implement policy that is beneficial to America at any time. And as American allegience changes, as it did in Iraq, the US should have the right to invade any country to make it adhere to its goals. Sheesh, who do these Egyptians think they are?
thedissenter
December 28th, 2011 at 4:44 pm
What a surprise, eh? Of course, the fact that Shillary went calling on the new regime as soon as they took over with pockets full of cash and the shipments of Made in USA weapons busted en route to Egypt shouldn't have given anybody an inkling of the fact that the new boss was the same as the old boss and the US was very much still in control of the show.
jack
December 28th, 2011 at 11:17 pm
oh look, thare pulling a bolshavek in stalin’s image, makes me think the world is being hijacked by a war pig, ever since like the american revolution (hijacked) the offical version of the Russian revolution may require a deeper look “hijacked” look around, 911, hijacked