In U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta’s speech in Baghdad marking the end of the war, he said the war was worth the price in blood and treasure because it set Iraq on a path to democracy.
“You will leave with great pride – lasting pride,” Panetta told U.S. troops. “Secure in knowing that your sacrifice has helped the Iraqi people to begin a new chapter in history.”
By the most conservative estimates available, America’s war in Iraq killed well over 110,000 Iraqi civilians and about 4,500 American soldiers. At least 2 million Iraqi civilians have been displaced from their homes due to the war.
Included in those martyrs for democracy that Panetta claimed deserved to die for the sake of Iraqi democracy were the one man, four women, two children, and three infant Iraqis who were summarily executed by U.S. forces in 2006. The “autopsies carried out at the Tikrit Hospital’s morgue revealed that all corpses were shot in the head and handcuffed.” These slaughtered Iraqis had a hand in a constructive future for Iraq.
The Iraqi civilians ruthlessly murdered in Haditha, “a Euphrates River town where Marines killed 24 Iraqis, including a 76-year-old man in a wheelchair, women and children, some just toddlers” are also included in that count, as are the rest of the civilians killed. “Iraqi civilians were being killed all the time,” read a recent New York Times report. Maj. Gen. Steve Johnson, the commander of American forces in Anbar, in his own testimony, described it like Panetta, as “a cost of doing business.”
The Iraqis who suffered torture and murder in Abu Ghraib and other prisons in Iraq are also presumably among Panetta’s necessary casualty count. Those individuals in a prison run by U.S.-supported post-Saddam government in which, “a joint US-Iraqi inspection discovered more than 1,400 detainees in squalid, cramped conditions,” many of whom were illegally detained. Prisoners “displayed bruising, broken bones, and lash-marks, many claimed to have been hung by handcuffs from a hook in the ceiling and beaten on the soles of their feet and their buttocks.”
Curiously, Panetta’s statement that the blood of over a hundred thousand people was “worth it,” doesn’t seem to compute with most Iraqis. In fact, as the last U.S. occupation forces left Iraq this week, Iraqis burned the American flag in an act that was apparently not grateful for the sacrifice Panetta exalted.
By most accounts, Iraqis disagree that they have even received this democracy Panetta speaks of as being worth the cost of oceans of blood. Indeed, Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Saleh al-Mutlaq warned just this week that the country is becoming a dictatorship under the U.S.-supported Maliki regime.
Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has circumvented Parliament, consolidated illegitimate power in a long trend of quasi-dictatorial behavior, harshly cracked down on peaceful political activism, harassed and even attacked journalists that were critical of his regime, and has been accused of torturing prisoners in secret Iraqi jails. In a diplomatic cable released by WikiLeaks, U.S. envoy Ryan Crocker noted in 2009 that Maliki’s turn towards more centralized rule is “in US interest.”
To Panetta, this is the liberated Iraq that was worth so many innocent lives, so much human suffering. But the costs for what Panetta calls democracy (and what everybody else calls tyranny) doesn’t end there.
Well over $800 billion dollars went to pay for the Iraq war. But in truth, Americans don’t know the true cost and the actual amount of wasted dollars because the Commission on Wartime Contracting has decided to hide its full findings and materials from the public for another two decades, despite its stated purposes of investigating and exposing government waste.
Another reason the true cost is hidden is because the Federal Reserve hasn’t disclosed how much money it spent on the war effort. At base, we know that between 2003 and 2008, over $40 billion in cash was secretly shipped in trucks from the New York Federal Reserve compound to to Baghdad to help pay for security and reconstruction. Most of it was stolen or misappropriated, and Americans don’t know the full amount.
The estimated cost of veterans’ health care resulting from the war in Iraq is approximately $4 trillion. That comes to an unaffordable $80 billion annually over the next 50 years. “We will have a vast overhang in domestic costs for caring for the wounded and covering retirement expenditure of the war fighters,” said Loren Thompson, a policy expert with the Lexington Institute. “The U.S. will continue to incur major costs for decades to come.”
Panetta reiterated in his speech the propaganda that is sure to peddled about the Iraq war for decades to come. But the sentiment simply does not fit with reality. Americans should take note, too, that very few U.S. officials are claiming the Iraq war was worth the blood and money in order to get rid of some national security threat posed by Saddam Hussein. Perhaps that is a lie not even they can stomach.
Of Course it was worth the price. Especially in dollars.
Never ever forget that 99.999% of each every and all of the trillions of dollars spent and to be spent on the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq went into some American's pocket.
Wouldn't it be fun to administer the waterboarding on live, international tv that disclosed how much of that $40 billion that came out of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York went into the pocket of its then-President, current Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner? And into who else's pockets?
That is actually not true at all – but fact probably matters very little to you since you have your mind all made up and would not want to confuse it with the facts!
The price in Human and Other Being Suffering is irrelevant to the people responsible for and benefitting most from this so-called "War" Against so-called "Terrorism."
But what else is new about War and Suffering and Perpetrators and Perpetuators?
As Kurtz put it:
"EXTERMINATE THEM!!!! Exterminate Them ALL."
Testing
Never forget, these people killed more Americans than Osama Bin Laden.
WHO killed more Americans?
The Iraqis?
By fighting back against an Invading and Occupying military force?
How many Iraqis did America kill during the Bush I-Clinton-Cheney Sanctions between 1990 and 2003?
"Never Forget," my ass
Never forget, these people killed more Americans than OBL
It's because the US government kills wholesale. Compared to this death factory, Bin Laden was just small peanuts.
WHO killed more Americans?
The Iraqis?
By fighting back against an Invading and Occupying military force?
How many Iraqis did America kill during the Bush I-Clinton-Cheney Sanctions between 1990 and 2003?
"Never Forget," my ass
Panetta is a Joke. This was all done to put Iraq on the path to Democracy? Oh, make me barf! Since when has America been concerned about Democracy?
Penetta spent his military service time in beautiful Fort Ord not in Vietnam. He may have sacrificed others but not certainly not himself. Panetta is a wonderful actor, repeating as the truly great Wilfred Owen said so eloquently: "The old lie, Dulce et Decorum est pro patria mori." One ICBM armed with a conventional warhead would have taken out Saddam Hussein at a cost of 1,000,000 not one trillion and perhaps 20 lives not a million plus. It's all a most disgusting lie.
There have been reports that the actual death toll among Iraqis as a result of the US invasion is over 1.2 million:
http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articl…
Over one million Iraqis have met violent deaths as a result of the 2003 invasion, according to a study conducted by the prestigious British polling group, Opinion Research Business (ORB). These numbers suggest that the invasion and occupation of Iraq rivals the mass killings of the last century—the human toll exceeds the 800,000 to 900,000 believed killed in the Rwandan genocide in 1994, and is approaching the number (1.7 million) who died in Cambodia’s infamous “Killing Fields” during the Khmer Rouge era of the 1970s.
ORB’s research covered fifteen of Iraq’s eighteen provinces. Those not covered include two of Iraq’s more volatile regions—Kerbala and Anbar—and the northern province of Arbil, where local authorities refused them a permit to work. In face-to-face interviews with 2,414 adults, the poll found that more than one in five respondents had had at least one death in their household as a result of the conflict, as opposed to natural cause.
Was for his stock portfolio!
It certainly was for his stock portfolio!!! They got rich, they don't care how many died.
Oh great, another one. First we have Madeleine Albright saying "it was worth it" to see that over 300,000 kids died due to our sanctions against Iraq after Iraq I. We have Dana Rohrabacher (my Congressman), suggesting that Iraq should pay us for destroying their country in the name of saving it. Now we have Panetta saying we will leave "with lasting pride". Does anybody have any doubt that Ron Paul is correct when he says the government's blatant swagger, arrogance, and total disregard for foreign peoples is one reason for the 9/11 attack and what is now inevitable, future attacks?
Oh I see gatekeeper 'anti'war is censoring posts, just more shills for big govmint. Not one more dime to you people ever!!
Please calm down: our comment system is having issues. We don't "censor"!
My post, seconds after posting, was receive with 'deleted by Admin'. Is that part of these issues?.
Why?
The system seems to be popping up a false "declined" message. I got that too. As a software developer, I'm sympathetic- sometimes these systems misbehave! For all our best efforts.
The Iraqis are wildly fortunate that the war is over. Through a curious quirk of history, they were conquered, but their conquerers- us- operated based on this absurd fiction that the point of the conquest was to "liberate" them. Of course the point was never to liberate them. The point was to take the country and keep it. Or loot it. Or both. Read the neocons complaints about the withdrawal and you quickly get that message. That country is ours, we paid for it in blood- why are we leaving?
But the fiction that the war was a liberation means that when the conquered people- uh, I mean, liberated people- finally said "beat it", we had to meekly pack up and leave.
Clearly the Iraqis have no illusions about the true nature of the war. They were conquered, and their conquerers are finally gone.
The Iraqis are aware that Americans would be very unhappy if the true story was publicized. So there won't be any massive outpouring of joy at Independence Day for Iraq.
But no doubt about it- if it was possible, there would be a massive celebration.
You need to x10-15 times the amount of Iraqis(the 'conservative' number – whatever that means, it isn't mentioned) who died over the course of the war. And then consider the number with injuries or psychological trauma, added to the 2 million displaced. Than consider the damage to infrastructure including the destruction and theft of priceless Iraqi Mesopotanian artifacts and structures.
Iraq's destruction was brought by Zionism. Period.
Is the ZBI at it again?
This is exactly why the truth is EXACTLY the opposite of what these people say. You don't need to read other views. Just take what they say and know that they are lying. This stuff isn't difficult.
Whenever these guys say anything, I just take the position that the opposite is true. It's pretty simple to understand the truth!
Certainly worth the price to him; he didn't pay anything.
4,500 soldiers killed, 30,000 injured and a cost of One Trillion Dollars!
The result: a country destroyed with millions killed and injured, a country that will descend into civil war, a country with a puppet Government.
What an achievement. A Pyrrhic VIctory perhaps?
http://www.dangerouscreation.com
"Worth the price" paid by others, not Leon Panetta or any of the plutocratic aristocracy. Be not just assuaged but heartened by its contrived platitudes.
How many fingers am I holding up?