Panetta Warns Debt Committee Against Cutting Defense Budget
The pressure on Congress to maintain exorbitantly high defense spending is a strong as ever, but plenty could be cut with ease
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta declared Thursday that he will not see the Pentagon budget cut. ”I don’t want to hollow out the force,” Panetta told the Senate Armed Services Committee. “I am not going to do that.”
Either forgetting or disregarding two important factors with respect to the impending budget cuts, Panetta showed unusual prerogative for a Defense Secretary. First, Congress has the power to dictate the allocation of funds, not the Defense Secretary. Secondly, the maximum proposed cut to defense is no larger than $600 billion over the space of a decade. This would barely dent the current balance of world defense spending, of which America makes up almost half.
If the special congressional deficit panel – the so-called super-committee – fails to agree on $1.2 trillion in federal spending cuts by Thanksgiving, the Pentagon would face around $600 billion in automatic, across the board cuts. Defense Department complaints are that they already have to deal with funding reductions mandated in the August debt deal, which equal $350 billion over ten years. So, Panetta warned, the super-committee had better make a deal before the deadline.
But signs are that he doesn’t have much to worry about. The 12 representatives in the super-committee all represent states where the biggest military industrial corporations build and manufacture weaponry. Serious cuts would put their constituents out of a job and are thus politically unpalatable.
Truthfully, resistance to cutting the defense budget is perverse after a decade of excessive increases in military expansion. The national security budget of the United States for FY 2012 totals around $1.2 trillion, or approximately one-third of the entire budget. And there is plenty of fraud, waste, abuse, and unnecessary militarism that could be cut while still out-spending any other country in defense.
Last 5 posts by John Glaser
- US, European Officials Dismiss Claims of Iran-Qaeda Connection - February 22nd, 2012
- Iran's Ayatollah Khamenei: We Will Never Seek Nuclear Weapons - February 22nd, 2012
- Israel Approves Construction of 695 Housing Units in West Bank - February 22nd, 2012
- Yemenis Elect New US Puppet in Sham Single-Candidate Election - February 21st, 2012
- Children Abused by Somali Militants, Some With US Support - February 21st, 2012





Jamie N
September 23rd, 2011 at 5:59 am
iF THEY CARE ABOUT THEIR COUNTRY TELL THEM TO QUIT AND THEN GET REAL AMERICANS IN THERE JOBS THEN CONSIDER ONLY CUTTING ILLEGAL WAR FUNDING NOT DEFENCE AND YOU WOULD HAVE REAL PEOPLE WORKING NOT SCUM AN STILL SAVE A BUNDEL.
Bob D
September 23rd, 2011 at 9:25 am
Panetta is right. What he is saying is "Go ahead and cut defense funds, make my day." He just needs to have his boys put an emergency war funding bill like they have been doing for the past 10 years. Congress is too locked in to perpetual war advocacy to say no. I'm sure when Obama says some of the money for his new spending will come out of defense, that is in the back of his mind. The gullibility of Americans, yes even the "real" Americans is mind boggling.
@wilcox66
September 23rd, 2011 at 12:58 pm
Panetta just got to the Pentagon-alreadfy he is an expert. DOD takes about $1.2 trillion a year. If we do not cut this bureaucracy, we are going under.
Druthers
September 23rd, 2011 at 1:09 pm
Guns not butter.
We are reaching the stage that ressembles pre-war Germany!