<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>News From Antiwar.com &#187; Tajikistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.antiwar.com/tag/tajikistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.antiwar.com</link>
	<description>Original and up-to-date news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:54:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Russia-led Bloc to NATO: Stop Pushing Afghan Militants North</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/11/04/russia-led-bloc-to-nato-stop-pushing-afghan-militants-north/</link>
		<comments>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/11/04/russia-led-bloc-to-nato-stop-pushing-afghan-militants-north/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ditz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kazakhstan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Krygyzstan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tajikistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uzbekistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=14046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russia-led Bloc to NATO: Stop Pushing Afghan Militants North &#124; Central Asian members of bloc fear growing instability ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russian Envoy Vitaly Churkin today issued a complaint on behalf of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), a Russian-led military alliance, calling on NATO to stop driving militants out of southern Afghanistan into the north.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5hlzFuTw82Ni6cOgCS8M6lIvUiGBg?docId=5034522">Churkin, a number of members of the CSTO in the region, many of whom are based along the northern Afghan frontier, are concerned that the instability NATO is causing is spreading into their nations</a>.</p>
<p>Indeed when NATO began its occupation in 2001, northern Afghanistan was almost exclusively on their side, as NATO entered into an already existing civil war on the side of the Northern Alliance faction. After over nine years of NATO failing to destroy the insurgency, however, the Taliban has added to its sphere of influence and now has a growing presence across the northern border.</p>
<p>Churkin also addressed Afghan government <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/8100478/Hamid-Karzai-criticises-Russian-drug-raid.html">complaints about Russia&#8217;s role in anti-drug operations in the country</a>, which NATO apparently included Russia in without asking the Karzai government beforehand. Churkin insisted Russia&#8217;s involvement was long overdue and would continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/11/04/russia-led-bloc-to-nato-stop-pushing-afghan-militants-north/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tajikistan Ambush Kills More Than 40 Troops</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/09/19/tajikistan-ambush-kills-more-than-40-troops/</link>
		<comments>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/09/19/tajikistan-ambush-kills-more-than-40-troops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ditz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tajikistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=13092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tajikistan Ambush Kills More Than 40 Troops &#124; Govt speculates attackers linked to Islamist opposition ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rt.com/Top_News/2010-09-19/tajikistan-criminals-escape-killed.html">More than 40 members of the Tajikistan military were killed today</a> in an ambush in Komarob Gorge. The troops had been deployed in the wake of a prison break and were aimed at reinforcing roadblocks in the northern part of the country.</p>
<p>The fighting continued throughout the day and into the night, as the Tajik Army struggled to get armored vehicles in the area. Though it remains unclear who was responsible for the ambush officials speculated that they were related to the Islamist opposition movement in the country.</p>
<p>The Tajik government <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_war_in_Tajikistan">faced a bloody civil war throughout the mid-1990&#8217;s with a lose confederation of opposition groups</a>, which included both liberal reformists and Islamist factions. A number of Islamist opposition factions remain banned since the end of the conflict, and a number of them have cultivated ties with groups across the border in the ethnic Tajik portion of Afghanistan.</p>
<p>The government has continued to arrest members of the banned groups ever since, which has continued to fuel resentment and occasionally clashes. Today&#8217;s ambush appears to be unusually organized, however, and may point to a new upsurge in violence in the nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/09/19/tajikistan-ambush-kills-more-than-40-troops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Af-Pak War Spill Into Tajikistan?</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/07/15/is-tajikistan-the-next-front-in-the-war-on-terror/</link>
		<comments>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/07/15/is-tajikistan-the-next-front-in-the-war-on-terror/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ditz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malakand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tajikistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=5042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Will Af-Pak War Spill Into Tajikistan? &#124; Diplomats see spillover from Swat Valley clash]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the eight years since the US invasion of Afghanistan, the conflict has steadily expanded through Pakistan. It started in the tribal areas, and indeed those are still seeing some of the largest unrest, but eventually it expanded into the North-West Frontier Province (NWFP), where a military offensive chased millions of Swatis from their homes. Isolated attacks have happened in the rest of the nation as well, and many doubt if the Pakistani government will survive.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s next for the growing militancy, besides setting monthly records in Afghanistan? Some diplomats fear that it could be <a href="http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=23302">Tajikistan, which they say is likely spillover from the Pakistani military&#8217;s Swat Valley offensive</a>, done at the behest of the US.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just the diplomats, locals also see <a href="http://english.aljazeera.net/focus/2009/07/2009714123630140237.html">trouble brewing in Tajikistan</a>. The government has tried to slough off the fighting as a war on drugs, but increasingly <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/featuredCrisis/idUSL9565885">attacks along the Afghan border seem to be for their own sake</a>, and far from just another drug war, the nation seems to be battling a full-fledged insurgency.</p>
<p>Tajikistan declared its independence during the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1991, and was almost immediately torn apart by a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_war_in_Tajikistan">bloody, five year long civil war</a> between the autocratic government and an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Tajik_Opposition">opposition</a> made up of both pro-democracy liberals and Islamists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/07/15/is-tajikistan-the-next-front-in-the-war-on-terror/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kyrgyzstan Base Closure Decision &#8216;Final&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/02/06/kyrgyzstan-base-closure-decision-final/</link>
		<comments>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/02/06/kyrgyzstan-base-closure-decision-final/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 02:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ditz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyrgyzstan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tajikistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=2338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the United States has continued to express hope that it would retain its base outside of Bishkek, the government of Kyrgyzstan has reiterated that their decision to oust the US from the base is final, and that there are no discussions on them keeping the base.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has expressed &#8220;regret&#8221; at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the United States has continued to express hope that it would retain its base outside of Bishkek, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7873866.stm">the government of Kyrgyzstan has reiterated that their decision to oust the US from the base is final</a>, and that there are no discussions on them keeping the base.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/4536959/Hillary-Clinton-expresses-regret-at-airbase-closure.html">Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has expressed &#8220;regret&#8221; at the decision</a>, and the United States is left scrambling to try to find other alternatives to the increasingly important overland supply route to Afghanistan. <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29032319/">Russia has said</a> they will cooperate, as has <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090206/wl_afp/kyrgyzstanrussiausafghanistanmilitary">Tajikistan which has said it would allow humanitarian supplies into Afghanistan</a>.</p>
<p>Many fingers <a href="../2009/02/03/kyrgyzstan-president-orders-us-air-base-closed/">have been pointed at Russia</a> over the base closure, with reports that they offered Kyrgyzstan an enormous amount of aid to oust the US. Russia <a href="http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=84794&amp;sectionid=351020602">has been aiming at creating a military alliance</a> in Central Asia called the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO). The alliance will include both Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, as well as Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Armenia, and Belarus, giving them effective control over the northern border of Afghanistan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/02/06/kyrgyzstan-base-closure-decision-final/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk

Served from: news.antiwar.com @ 2012-02-10 18:55:37 -->
