Over the weekend, the UN and the Red Cross both reported a number of Mosul civilians were being treated for exposure to a likely “blister agent,” and that there was evidence of a possible chemical weapons attack being involved. Noteworthy, they said they were unsure if it was ISIS or Iraq’s military who carried out the attack.
This seemed a strange addendum at the time, as ISIS is known to have chemical weapons, and Iraq’s military seemingly is known not to. Yet today, it was Iraq’s government that was quick to try to kill the investigation, saying they believe no evidence exists of any attacks at all.
The UN was quick to express concern about “possible ISIS attacks” and British Ambassador Matthew Rycroft called for an investigation by Iraq that would end with the conclusion that it was ISIS’ fault.
This appeared an easy out for Iraq irrespective of the circumstances, and the fact that Iraq, which once had a chemical weapons arsenal, is being so deliberately evasive is noteworthy, and raises doubts over whether there isn’t more to these attacks than first meets the eye.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Report: Trump Plans to Reverse Obama's Cuba Policies - May 29th, 2017
- Death Toll Rises as Philippines Tries to Recapture City of Marawi - May 28th, 2017
- Egypt, UK Attacks Bring New Focus on Libya - May 28th, 2017
- US Airstrikes Kill 20 Civilians Near ISIS Capital of Raqqa - May 28th, 2017
- Iraq's Shi'ite Militias Advance Toward Syria Border - May 28th, 2017