Over the weekend, the UN and the Red Cross both reported a number of Mosul civilians were being treated for exposure to a likely “blister agent,” and that there was evidence of a possible chemical weapons attack being involved. Noteworthy, they said they were unsure if it was ISIS or Iraq’s military who carried out the attack.
This seemed a strange addendum at the time, as ISIS is known to have chemical weapons, and Iraq’s military seemingly is known not to. Yet today, it was Iraq’s government that was quick to try to kill the investigation, saying they believe no evidence exists of any attacks at all.
The UN was quick to express concern about “possible ISIS attacks” and British Ambassador Matthew Rycroft called for an investigation by Iraq that would end with the conclusion that it was ISIS’ fault.
This appeared an easy out for Iraq irrespective of the circumstances, and the fact that Iraq, which once had a chemical weapons arsenal, is being so deliberately evasive is noteworthy, and raises doubts over whether there isn’t more to these attacks than first meets the eye.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Catalans Rally at Barcelona Parliament, Push for Independence - October 21st, 2017
- Turkey: Kurdish Banner in Raqqa Proves US Sided With Terrorists - October 20th, 2017
- Many Afghan Troops Run Away While in US to Train - October 20th, 2017
- Spain to Start Catalonia Takeover Saturday - October 20th, 2017
- Niger Deaths Highlight Growing US Involvement in Africa - October 20th, 2017