Efforts to Keep Troops 'Non-Combat' Becoming Less and Less Credible
As US wars drag on, there is a concerted effort by the administration to insist that the troops aren’t really taking part in combat operations for decades on end in the same countries. This has had officials lying regularly about “boots on the ground” and about what counts as a combat soldier.
In Afghanistan, Gen. John Nicholson has been putting more and more troops into front-line areas, trying to slow mounting Taliban gains. He confirmed that special forces and other US troops accompany Afghan military forces into combat “about 10 percent of the time.”
But the troops being embedded in combat units, going into combat situations with weapons, are “non-combat” troops, with Nicholson insisting the troops are there “in an advisory role” and aren’t meant to be participating directly in close combat.
Indeed, this claim that the troops are advisers is so non-credible that the Pentagon has added a new term, calling them “expeditionary advising packages,” which attempts to explain why, despite being nominally non-combat, they’re getting thrown headlong into combat situations.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Iraq MP Urges Inquiry Into Airstrike Against Shi'ite Funeral in Daquq - October 24th, 2016
- Iran: Turkey Mustn't Violate Iraqi Sovereignty Over Mosul - October 24th, 2016
- Syrian Army Makes New Gains South of Aleppo - October 24th, 2016
- US Army Chief Talks Up War With Russia, Insists US Will Win - October 24th, 2016
- UN: All Sides to Blame for Lack of Aleppo Evacuations - October 24th, 2016