In his Wednesday night speech, President Obama once again downplayed the idea of Congress having a serious role to play in the new ISIS war, insisting he has the authority to launch the war unilaterally.
Still, he pushed Congress to give some sort of rubber stamp to the operation, and more importantly to give him broad new resources to spend on the conflict, including bankrolling a new campaign to arm Syrian rebels, in spite of many of the arms ending up in ISIS hands.
The insistence that the US Congress has no role in the war authorization itself doesn’t seem to be getting much real resistance from the Congress themselves, as indeed there’s been very little public debate on the war, and not much public pushback on the conflict.
There are Congressmen in both parties averse to the ISIS war, but so far the indications are that there aren’t that many so averse that they want to get it down on record as a vote against the conflict.
Indeed, the primary pushes for a vote at all seem to be coming from hawks like Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R – KY), who are desperate to hype the war, and the administration’s efforts to acquire funding for its various sideline campaigns are likely to be quick, and with little debate.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Trump Wants High-Profile Meeting With Putin at G20 Summit - June 26th, 2017
- House Spending Bill Threatens to Suspend Nuclear Treaty With Russia - June 26th, 2017
- Bahrain Accuses Qatar of Seeking 'Military Escalation' - June 26th, 2017
- White House Appears to Be Planning Attack on Assad - June 26th, 2017
- Top Senator Blocks Gulf Arms Sales Over Qatar Crisis - June 26th, 2017