Announcing the renewal of their “mission to Afghanistan” through at least March of 2014, the United Nations expressed concern about the upcoming 2014 election, insisting it was “critical” for the election process to go credibly this time.
The 2014 Presidential election is set for April 5, 2014, and would-be candidates have already warned that they may not even bother if the system is as poorly set up as it was for the 2009 and 2010 votes.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai “won” reelection in 2009, though it would be more fair to say he achieved a second term in office by refusing to make any reforms until his opponent in the run-off vote simply dropped out.
If 2009 was an embarrassment, the 2010 parliamentary votes were an absolute travesty, with every single election in doubt, leading the election commission banning some apparent winners and eventually getting to the point where commission officials were just picking winners and losers seemingly on a whim.
Since then Afghanistan has gotten even more bribe-happy and corrupt, and no real reforms have been made, so there is no reason to believe the 2014 election, in which Karzai will not be able to run because of term limits, will be any more fair.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Trump Wants High-Profile Meeting With Putin at G20 Summit - June 26th, 2017
- House Spending Bill Threatens to Suspend Nuclear Treaty With Russia - June 26th, 2017
- Bahrain Accuses Qatar of Seeking 'Military Escalation' - June 26th, 2017
- White House Appears to Be Planning Attack on Assad - June 26th, 2017
- Top Senator Blocks Gulf Arms Sales Over Qatar Crisis - June 26th, 2017