Rand Paul Pushes ‘Conditional’ Foreign Aid
Insists Recipients of US Aid 'Act Like Allies'
While his father Rep. Ron Paul (R – TX) has made a career of loudly condemning foreign aid on general principle (along with a myriad of other types of government largesse), Sen. Rand Paul’s (R – KY) recent criticism of US foreign aid policies has taken on a very different tone, at least beneath the veneer.
Its not that the US government is spending tens of billions of dollars it doesn’t have that the younger Paul objects to, you see. Rather, he’s annoyed that the money isn’t buying the pretense of gratitude he seems to think it should, and wants to slap conditions on it.
“If you want to cash an American check than act like an ally,” Paul insisted, saying he believes it is unacceptable to be sending aid to nations like Egypt and Pakistan while anti-US protests are continuing in the streets.
Interestingly, Sen. Paul doesn’t seem to believe that recipients of US aid will actually become proper allies, and openly mocks that suggestion in his comments. But instead of taking his comments to their logical conclusion he ultimately decides that the pretense of alliance is good enough for him, and for America.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Mali Rebels Bomb French Uranium Mine in Niger, 26 Killed - May 23rd, 2013
- Credibility at Stake as Syrian Rebels Debate Peace Talks - May 23rd, 2013
- Pakistan's Military, Incoming PM Agree to Stop US Drones - May 23rd, 2013
- Netanyahu: Diplomacy, Sanctions Unable to Stop Iran - May 23rd, 2013
- Pentagon Budget Woes Related to Nov. 2011 Attack on Pakistan - May 23rd, 2013





David J.
September 21st, 2012 at 8:10 pm
That’s libertyism for ya. It’s not libertarianism.
skulz fontaine
September 21st, 2012 at 8:18 pm
Sen. Rand Paul… the name sort of rolls off the tongue. You know, like quisling.
Karl
September 21st, 2012 at 8:43 pm
He is upset money spent is not buying them power. He is upset he does not have more power over recipients of US aid. He wants aid to continue so he may wield more power.
the lion
September 21st, 2012 at 8:49 pm
So Senator Rand Paul wants to make conditions that would be unconstitutional in the United States, like stopping the right of free speach. I thought that he was interested in letting citizens have free speach or is that only the citizens that speak what he wants to hear!
JLS
September 21st, 2012 at 9:28 pm
It was a good speech considering that even questioning foreign aid has been completely taboo for my whole lifetime. You gotta start somewhere. I'm sure the honorable senators were shocked…shocked! to discover that we prop up dictators with our foreign aid.
TooTrue
September 21st, 2012 at 9:34 pm
Rand Paul is all veneer; you could say he's veneer off the old block.
davidj8800
September 22nd, 2012 at 12:33 am
He’s a politician and conservative, not a libertarian.
richard vajs
September 22nd, 2012 at 2:46 am
Of course, get rid of ALL foreign aid not actually going to humanitarian relief. But that is not what the good Senator is asking for, is it? Strange that he didn't mention the sh—y little racist, land-stealing country that gets a lion's share of our foreign aid largesse, isn't it?
JoaoAlfaiate
September 22nd, 2012 at 3:48 am
An interventionist-like the rest of Congress.
James Madison
September 22nd, 2012 at 5:14 am
a really stupid article, no wonder "antiwar" is always begging for money. Rand Paul is the real deal, he was just outvoted 90-1 on Iran war sanctions. Really smart to keep kicking down your one ally in the Senate.
Levendi Man
September 22nd, 2012 at 5:33 am
The people of those counties never see a dime of the aid. The corrupt political leaders keep ALL the money. So………our corrupt political leaders put the "tax gun" to our head, take our money and send it to other corrupt political leaders. All while we stand around and watch and listen to the talking heads on TV rant the talking points of the two political parties that have sold out the American idea. Go back to your roots and read how we became a country and what it took to free ourselves from the tyranny of taxation without representation. It was only around 200 years ago. Vote out all incumbents, put in term limits and get rid of all subsidies, bail outs and tax loop holes. Throw out the tax code and have one lower flat tax on every dollar earned so no favors can be lobbied for.
Corey
September 22nd, 2012 at 6:22 am
This article is disingenuous. He is against foreign aid, has said it many times. He is just trying to get as much abolished as possible. I guess Antiwar.com is for all or nothing.
CharliePeters
September 23rd, 2012 at 7:58 am
California, Obama / Mitt, November contest would likely give the California winner prize to Obama but how would a 3 way Obama, Mitt & Ron write in vote count end up? RP votes in 2008 were counted.
The Goldman Sacs / Fed reserve / GMO food-fuel twins might create a fun contest with the Texas Dr. Ron Paul
Audit the Federal Reserve, Support HR 459 Paul & S 202 Paul
Is this game about D R or other? maybe it is about saving the republic. Maybe Obama and Mitt are the underdogs.