UN ceasefire monitors attempting to investigate rebel claims of a massacre in the tiny farming village of al-Qubeir were prevented from accessing the site today, having been stopped at a military checkpoint near the region.
UN officials familiar with the situation say that the monitors were stopped at the checkpoint by both troops and “civilian supporters,” and that the monitors were fired upon, though details of that portion of the incident have not been detailed.
The Assad regime has yet to respond to the claims of a massacre in Qubeir, with the rebels saying at least 78 civilians and possibly over 100 were killed in the area. Syrian state media reported only nine deaths in the village, and attributed it to “armed terrorist groups.”
Qubeir is the second reported massacre in less than two weeks. The previous one, in Houla, was initially attributed by the rebels to regime shelling, but after this was disproven both regime and rebels blamed militias loyal to the other side for the killings.
Since the
1. US-OSCE-Kosovo-war-igniting RACAK-massacre-Fake of war lord asset William Walker who declared fallen KLA warriors as civilian villagers shot death at their knies, (despite presence of OSCE monitors and a AFP film team who said: "impossible", but were virtually never published)
2. the terrorist protection by UN troops,
3. the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq,
4. Afghanistan which allegedly would not hand over Bin Laden (in fact USA began attacking them at the same day Taliban declared willing ness to deliver Bin Laden even to a third country for trial),
5. and when the "UN non-fly zone"-fighter-jets shot at Gaddafi, because he obviously did fly to high and inflicted the so-called fraud "UN non-fly zone" …
you can not avoid, that the world begins to understand what "humanitarina wars" really are and how "trustful" UN really is.
WHY should the monitors not beeing stopped at the checkpoint by both troops and “civilian supporters,” when the monitors were fired upon by the US-terrorists?
Why Jason Ditz puts “civilian supporters” in qoutes??
Why is this case not treathed what it is: A long planned (unconventional) war of the USA ->
it easily can be proofed:
1. USA did plan war against Syria: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-TZxI8m8ss
more detailed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TY2DKzastu8&feature=p...
2. "peaceful unarmed civilians were armed from the beginning: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vLd_9c4WOU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCqmI1SQB5o http://www.debka.com/article/22017/
3. US-organized revolutions: http://www.youtube.com/watch?hl=en&v=lpXbA6yZY-8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cr2XyIKHX1k
4. what happens in Syria: search "us army unconventional warfare"
5. Huge majority for Assad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt9A5rMqEDM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYlgDXP411w http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYQkUl-xwH0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSb0lxFcMn0
6. the real "brutal dictator": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8P6860vIiA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oc4ZZ-yXaOQ
7: Media fraud: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x–Td_8JXYk
8.on of the many clear involvements of the Saudi extremists:
Father sells his son as suicid-bomber to BABA AMR in Homs, Syria: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuGhi-WlBEU
It is ´not the first time I have sent these links here, but obviously Jason Ditz still does not know it. Someone should tell him this in order not to act as pro-war writer.
I also fear he does not understand the background of this war that finally goes back to the 90ties when USSR and the whole eastern block had its capitalist revolutions and the deathly danger of a useless US defense industry arised – in search of new reasons for war they found what we have seen then and as shown in the first two links above. Without permanent use of bombs or creating wars – nobody orders bombs.
WHY should the monitors not beeing stopped at the checkpoint by both troops and “civilian supporters,” when the monitors were fired upon by the US-terrorists?
Why Jason Ditz puts “civilian supporters” in qoutes??
Why is this case not treathed what it is: A long planned (unconventional) war of the USA ->
it easily can be proofed:
1. USA did plan war against Syria: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-TZxI8m8ss
more detailed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TY2DKzastu8&feature=p...
2. "peaceful unarmed civilians were armed from the beginning: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vLd_9c4WOU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCqmI1SQB5o http://www.debka.com/article/22017/
3. US-organized revolutions: http://www.youtube.com/watch?hl=en&v=lpXbA6yZY-8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cr2XyIKHX1k
4. what happens in Syria: search "us army unconventional warfare"
5. Huge majority for Assad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt9A5rMqEDM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYlgDXP411w http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYQkUl-xwH0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSb0lxFcMn0
6. the real "brutal dictator": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8P6860vIiA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oc4ZZ-yXaOQ
7: Media fraud: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x–Td_8JXYk
8.on of the many clear involvements of the Saudi extremists:
Father sells his son as suicid-bomber to BABA AMR in Homs, Syria: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuGhi-WlBEU
It is ´not the first time I have sent these links here, but obviously Jason Ditz still does not know it. Someone should tell him this in order not to act as pro-war writer.
I also fear he does not understand the background of this war that finally goes back to the 90ties when USSR and the whole eastern block had its capitalist revolutions and the deathly danger of a useless US defense industry arised – in search of new reasons for war they found what we have seen then and as shown in the first two links above. Without permanent use of bombs or creating wars – nobody orders bombs.
It is really not complicated. It is the militants that controlled the places where murders occured. It is the same militants that are preventing investigation. All these areas were infested by paramiilitary groups AFTER the Government pulled out of the "civilian" areas. These areas lost the protection from the Army, and this is the result. Really, not too complicated.
Ron Paul wrote about the fact that the paramilitaries have no support among population, and there are no defections from the government, army, business community. Also, no Universities support them, and no students support them.
Who are these people? And what hold they have on us — that we really have to bend over backwards to protect them?