The question of the moral acceptability of torture may have been shrugged off by officials, but a new Senate report to be released soon is going to show that the strategy wasn’t particularly effective either.
According to those familiar with the probe, it is going to show that despite Bush Administration claims to the contrary, torturing suspects didn’t produce any serious intelligence coups, and played no significant role in finding bin Laden.
Former officials have loudly defended the practice, insisting it wasn’t “technically” torture under US law, and a new book called “Hard Measures” to be published next week by a former top CIA official is going to claim that the practices “saved American lives.”
The Senate report will not only throw these claims into doubt, but will also reportedly include instances when torturing suspects produced false leads. The CIA has defended the policies as well, but insisted that it has never carried out any studies to see if they actually work.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- US Tones Down Rhetoric, Actions Ahead of North Korea Summit - April 24th, 2018
- Trump Threatens Iran as Deadline to Withdraw From Nuclear Deal Looms - April 24th, 2018
- Trump Again Backtracks on Syria Pullout, Vows 'Strong and Lasting Footprint' - April 24th, 2018
- West Seeks to Bypass Russian Veto on UN Moves Against Syria - April 24th, 2018
- House Lawmakers Offer Alternative War Authorization Proposal - April 24th, 2018