Speaking in Chile on Monday, President Obama promised that the US command over the Western attack on Libya would be transferred in a “matter of days.” Exactly whom he intends to transfer it to, however, is unclear.
So far, the whole “coalition” that President Obama is referring to seems to begin and end with Britain and France. Qatar is expected to join in soon, in some very limited fashion, but the Arab League has already condemned the bombings. Norway is also planning to deploy a handful of planes.
British Prime Minister David Cameron is calling for NATO to take over, but many of NATO’s member nations aren’t even involved in this war, and member nations like Germany and Turkey seem to want nothing to do with the conflict. France has also expressed concern that NATO’s control would damage Arab public opinion over the war.
The problem of who exactly is supposed to be in charge is compounded by myriad disagreements over what the goal is supposed to be. The Obama Administration was quite eager to jump into this war after the UN vote, but it seems there was almost no consideration of what would happen after it started.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- US to Cut Some Somali Military Aid Over Misuse, Corruption - December 17th, 2017
- Sistani: Shi'ite Militias Should Remain as Part of Iraq's Security Services - December 17th, 2017
- Mounting Tensions Drive Arms Sales to Multi-Decade High - December 17th, 2017
- US Commandos Participate in Thousands of Afghan Ground Operations - December 17th, 2017
- Israeli Crackdowns, Arrests Fail to Stop Jerusalem Protests - December 17th, 2017