Nuclear weapons enthusiast and subcommittee chair on “strategic arms” Rep. Mike Turner (R – OH), has warned the new Republican dominated House that in their hopes of getting the budget deficit under control they had better not touch President Obama’s calls for dramatic increases in nuclear weapons spending.
“The only debate should be whether there is adequate funding,” insisted Turner, who had previously lambasted the Obama Administration for issuing a new nuclear weapons policy statement that only explicitly threatened to pre-emptively nuke Iran for “weakening the strength of our deterrent.”
Turner now appears quite enthusiastic in his support for President Obama’s wholesale increases in war spending, particularly his “modernization” scheme for America’s weapons of mass destruction.
Turner’s position will no doubt complicate already dicey efforts to curb the record military spending, and points to the real reason that each new military budget is even bigger than the last – everyone is an armchair hobbyist for some sort of devestating form of mass murder, and each has its own built-in support network.
If the Republican Congress truly wanted to get its financial House in order, the massive spending on nuclear weapons, surely the most superfluous spending conceivable, would be one of the first things on the chopping block. But its rhetorical value, and the civilization-destroying program’s long list of enthusiastic fanboys, ensures that this will never happen.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Saudis Demolish Historic Shi'ite Neighborhood, Sparking Unrest - June 27th, 2017
- Turkey, Kurdish Forces Trade Fire in North Syria's Afrin District - June 27th, 2017
- Mattis: US Will Keep Arming Syrian Kurds After Raqqa Falls - June 27th, 2017
- Russia: US Warning to Syria Is Unacceptable - June 27th, 2017
- Saudi Arabia Insists Qatar Demands Are 'Non-Negotiable' - June 27th, 2017