Though there appears to have been precious little evidence supporting anything untoward in the latest IAEA report on Iran, there seems to be considerable eagerness to start some sort of speculation based on something mentioned in it.
Today that concern seems to be centered around a mention that Iran had rejected some of the proposed inspectors on the grounds that they might be biased, which led the US today to condemn the move as “unprecedented” and accuse Iran of “trying to intimidate the IAEA.”
But this doesn’t seem to be the case, as the IAEA does allow nations to reject inspectors, and none of the rejections changed what should be the most important aspect, that the IAEA “continues to verify the non-diversion of nuclear materials.”
Iran hit back at the allegations today, insisting that the IAEA was never meant to be a “subordinate” to the UN Security Council and that it rejects any demands above and beyond the provisions of its Comprehensive Safeguards agreement as illegitmate.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- US-Led Airstrikes Killed 472 Civilians in Syria in the Past Month - June 23rd, 2017
- US Narrows Counter-Extremism Program to Focus on Islamists - June 23rd, 2017
- Senator: US Strikes on Syrian Forces 'Unlawful' - June 23rd, 2017
- Kurds Warn Turkey's Buildup in North Syria Threatens Raqqa Invasion - June 23rd, 2017
- Senators Seek Clarification on US Role in Yemen Torture - June 23rd, 2017