US Admiral: NATO Not Living Up to Afghan Training Pledges
NATO Contributes Less Than Half of Promised Trainers
America’s head of European Command Admiral James Stavridis today told the Senate that NATO was failing to live up to its pledges for providing more trainers for the Afghan security forces.
“It is absolutely correct to say that NATO has fallen short in providing these vital trainers, Stavridis said, adding that NATO nations had promised 1,278 trainers but had provided less than half, only 541.
The announcement is somewhat surprising, as some NATO member nations had been keen to replace their combat commitments in whole or in part with trainers, seen as a much safer job. Still, it seems they are reluctant to actually come through with the trainers.
President Obama’s new strategy for December, as with his new strategy from last March and President Bush’s new strategy in late 2008, called for massive increases in the size of the Afghan military, but as the Karzai government struggles to bring a significant portion of its population into the poorly paid, poorly equipped military, a shortage of trainings is actually further hamstringing a military that is struggling not only to grow, but to replace the large number of disillusioned recruits who leave in short order.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Centrifuge Glitch Fuels Latest Iran Scare Stories - May 25th, 2012
- Iraq MPs Push Return to Saddam-Era Conscription Laws - May 25th, 2012
- US Negotiator on Iran to 'Reaffirm Our Unshakeable Commitment to Israel' - May 25th, 2012
- UN: Syria Bombings Likely by 'Established Terrorist Groups' - May 25th, 2012
- Military to Avoid Embarrassing Pictures by Banning Photography - May 25th, 2012





Andy
March 10th, 2010 at 8:46 am
NATO is pretty much useless as an alliance now. Maybe even America will recognize this.
Wolfgang
March 10th, 2010 at 5:36 pm
If Germans would have a "Democracy" , there wouldn't be any troups in Afghanistan supporting the US war of aggression! (Agression because there was never a need to defend the USA against Iraq or Afghanistan!) And there would'nt be any NATO membership of Germany.
If the US wants to be the only Superpower they should do it on their own and pay for it!
Germans have NO interest in supporting the USA to rule the world in their own sick fashion!!
US troups leave Germany!!
Wolfgang
Valerianus
March 10th, 2010 at 11:08 pm
The FedGov needs auxiliary forces to absorb casualties and do the boring garrison work. Both NATO and the Afghan puppet forces fulfill this role, and therefore will always be needed. The FedGov's imperial paradigm is founded on this fact.
Valerianus
March 10th, 2010 at 11:11 pm
I'm waiting for the day Germany gives the US military a firm "Raus!" and a kick in the ass to move them along. The French did it back in the '60s.
Henry_Clemens
March 11th, 2010 at 3:22 am
"US Admiral: NATO Not Living Up to Afghan Training Pledges" That's great news!