I have a lot of respect for you and your work, but you've allowed a significant piece of war propaganda about "weapons of mass destruction" to slip into your comment here:

How could it have been "discovered," post invasion, that there were no "weapons of mass destruction" when it was thought all along, pre-invasion, that Saddam Hussein had none? The way you have written this reinforces the lie that Bush and Blair sincerely believed Hussein had such weapons, that such weapons were a threat to the world, and acted to rid the world of that threat. Most of the evidence indicates they didn't really believe Saddam actually had those weapons. Saddam himself denied it and the weapons teams backed him on that.

So you would be better to write: "though of course after the invasion it was CONFIRMED that Saddam had none."

Also, "weapons of mass destruction" is a propaganda slogan that should probably remain in quotation marks in any writing by an objective journalist.

As a person of English descent, I am somewhat saddened to see my ancestral homeland guided by violent foreigners such as this Zionist jew. To think that our government is run in the interests of another country. It's time to take send these horrid little traitors packing.